BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

488 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32356438)

  • 1. Impact of the anatomical location and the number of metastatic lymph nodes on gastric cancer patient´s survival.
    Duchon R; Bernadic M; Pindak D
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2020; 121(4):253-258. PubMed ID: 32356438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the staging of regional lymph nodes using the sixth and seventh editions of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification system for the evaluation of overall survival in gastric cancer patients: findings of a case-control analysis involving a single institution in China.
    Deng J; Zhang R; Pan Y; Wang B; Wu L; Jiao X; Bao T; Hao X; Liang H
    Surgery; 2014 Jul; 156(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 24929759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Topographic lymph node staging system shows prognostic superiority compared to the 8th edition of AJCC TNM in gastric cancer. A western monocentric experience.
    Lauricella S; Caricato M; Mascianà G; Carannante F; Carnazza M; Bonaccorso A; Angeletti S; Ciccozzi M; Coppola R; Capolupo GT
    Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 34():223-233. PubMed ID: 32869748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of staging between the old (6th edition) and new (7th edition) TNM classifications in advanced gastric cancer.
    Kikuchi S; Futawatari N; Sakuramoto S; Katada N; Yamashita K; Shibata T; Nemoto M; Watanabe M
    Anticancer Res; 2011 Jun; 31(6):2361-5. PubMed ID: 21737665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after curative resection (R0) regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes.
    Alatengbaolide ; Lin D; Li Y; Xu H; Chen J; Wang B; Liu C; Lu P
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2013 Aug; 36(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 22547011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Clinical value of superior mesenteric vein (No.14v) lymph node dissection in D2 gastrectomy for locally advanced distal gastric cancer].
    Lu W; Zeng X; Li N; Liu H
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1136-1141. PubMed ID: 30370512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of the value of 7th editions of UICC-AJCC esophageal and gastric cancer TNM staging systems for prognostic prediction of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (Siewert type II)].
    Shi GD; Luo ZL; Fu MY; Tian D; Zhang L; Zhang KP
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 36(12):916-21. PubMed ID: 25623766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system.
    Fujii K; Isozaki H; Okajima K; Nomura E; Niki M; Sako S; Izumi N; Mabuchi H; Nishiguchi K; Tanigawa N
    Br J Surg; 1999 May; 86(5):685-9. PubMed ID: 10361195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer focusing on the "N" parameter-related survival: the monoinstitutional NodUs Italian study.
    Marano L; Boccardi V; Braccio B; Esposito G; Grassia M; Petrillo M; Pezzella M; Porfidia R; Reda G; Romano A; Schettino M; Cosenza A; Izzo G; Di Martino N
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 13():215. PubMed ID: 26179492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does a minimum number of 16 retrieved nodes affect survival in curatively resected gastric cancer?
    Biondi A; D'Ugo D; Cananzi FC; Papa V; Borasi A; Sicoli F; Degiuli M; Doglietto G; Persiani R
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jun; 41(6):779-86. PubMed ID: 25899981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and validation of a staging system for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer by the International Collaboration on Oropharyngeal cancer Network for Staging (ICON-S): a multicentre cohort study.
    O'Sullivan B; Huang SH; Su J; Garden AS; Sturgis EM; Dahlstrom K; Lee N; Riaz N; Pei X; Koyfman SA; Adelstein D; Burkey BB; Friborg J; Kristensen CA; Gothelf AB; Hoebers F; Kremer B; Speel EJ; Bowles DW; Raben D; Karam SD; Yu E; Xu W
    Lancet Oncol; 2016 Apr; 17(4):440-451. PubMed ID: 26936027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: can the type of lymphadenectomy condition the long-term results?].
    Di Martino N; Izzo G; Cosenza A; Vicenzo L; Monaco L; Torelli F; Basciotti A; Brillantino A; Marra A
    Suppl Tumori; 2005; 4(3):S84-5. PubMed ID: 16437920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor in gastric cancer patients following D1 resection. Comparison with the current TNM staging system.
    Bouliaris K; Rachiotis G; Diamantis A; Christodoulidis G; Polychronopoulou E; Tepetes K
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1350-1356. PubMed ID: 28433495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effectiveness of the new (7th) UICC N classification in the prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer patients: a comparative study between the 5th/6th and 7th UICC N classification.
    Chae S; Lee A; Lee JH
    Gastric Cancer; 2011 Jun; 14(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 21360132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The RML of lymph node metastasis was superior to the LODDS for evaluating the prognosis of gastric cancer.
    Liu H; Deng J; Zhang R; Hao X; Jiao X; Liang H
    Int J Surg; 2013; 11(5):419-24. PubMed ID: 23541652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anatomical location of metastatic lymph nodes: an indispensable prognostic factor for gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection.
    Zhao B; Zhang J; Zhang J; Chen X; Chen J; Wang Z; Xu H; Huang B
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):185-192. PubMed ID: 29228846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognostic value of lymph node staging in gastric cancer.
    Ichikawa D; Kurioka H; Ueshima Y; Shirono K; Kan K; Shioaki Y; Lee CJ; Hamashima T; Deguchi E; Ikeda E; Mutoh F; Yamagishi H
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2003; 50(49):301-4. PubMed ID: 12630046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Rationality of N3 classification and its sub-classification in TNM classification system for advanced gastric cancer].
    Cheng Y; Huang J; Zhu Z; Xu H
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 19(7):749-55. PubMed ID: 27452751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Study on the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic difference of gastric stump cancer between non-anastomotic site and anastomotic site].
    Chen L; Wei S; Ye Z; Wang Y; Zheng Q; Zhuo C; Xiao J; Zeng Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jan; 20(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 28105623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The rationality of N3 classification in the 7th edition of the International Union Against Cancer TNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinomas: a case-control study.
    Jun KH; Lee JS; Kim JH; Kim JJ; Chin HM; Park SM
    Int J Surg; 2014; 12(9):893-6. PubMed ID: 25026311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.