These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

494 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32356438)

  • 1. Impact of the anatomical location and the number of metastatic lymph nodes on gastric cancer patient´s survival.
    Duchon R; Bernadic M; Pindak D
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2020; 121(4):253-258. PubMed ID: 32356438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the staging of regional lymph nodes using the sixth and seventh editions of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification system for the evaluation of overall survival in gastric cancer patients: findings of a case-control analysis involving a single institution in China.
    Deng J; Zhang R; Pan Y; Wang B; Wu L; Jiao X; Bao T; Hao X; Liang H
    Surgery; 2014 Jul; 156(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 24929759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Topographic lymph node staging system shows prognostic superiority compared to the 8th edition of AJCC TNM in gastric cancer. A western monocentric experience.
    Lauricella S; Caricato M; Mascianà G; Carannante F; Carnazza M; Bonaccorso A; Angeletti S; Ciccozzi M; Coppola R; Capolupo GT
    Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 34():223-233. PubMed ID: 32869748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of staging between the old (6th edition) and new (7th edition) TNM classifications in advanced gastric cancer.
    Kikuchi S; Futawatari N; Sakuramoto S; Katada N; Yamashita K; Shibata T; Nemoto M; Watanabe M
    Anticancer Res; 2011 Jun; 31(6):2361-5. PubMed ID: 21737665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after curative resection (R0) regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes.
    Alatengbaolide ; Lin D; Li Y; Xu H; Chen J; Wang B; Liu C; Lu P
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2013 Aug; 36(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 22547011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Clinical value of superior mesenteric vein (No.14v) lymph node dissection in D2 gastrectomy for locally advanced distal gastric cancer].
    Lu W; Zeng X; Li N; Liu H
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1136-1141. PubMed ID: 30370512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of the value of 7th editions of UICC-AJCC esophageal and gastric cancer TNM staging systems for prognostic prediction of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (Siewert type II)].
    Shi GD; Luo ZL; Fu MY; Tian D; Zhang L; Zhang KP
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 36(12):916-21. PubMed ID: 25623766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system.
    Fujii K; Isozaki H; Okajima K; Nomura E; Niki M; Sako S; Izumi N; Mabuchi H; Nishiguchi K; Tanigawa N
    Br J Surg; 1999 May; 86(5):685-9. PubMed ID: 10361195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer focusing on the "N" parameter-related survival: the monoinstitutional NodUs Italian study.
    Marano L; Boccardi V; Braccio B; Esposito G; Grassia M; Petrillo M; Pezzella M; Porfidia R; Reda G; Romano A; Schettino M; Cosenza A; Izzo G; Di Martino N
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 13():215. PubMed ID: 26179492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does a minimum number of 16 retrieved nodes affect survival in curatively resected gastric cancer?
    Biondi A; D'Ugo D; Cananzi FC; Papa V; Borasi A; Sicoli F; Degiuli M; Doglietto G; Persiani R
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jun; 41(6):779-86. PubMed ID: 25899981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and validation of a staging system for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer by the International Collaboration on Oropharyngeal cancer Network for Staging (ICON-S): a multicentre cohort study.
    O'Sullivan B; Huang SH; Su J; Garden AS; Sturgis EM; Dahlstrom K; Lee N; Riaz N; Pei X; Koyfman SA; Adelstein D; Burkey BB; Friborg J; Kristensen CA; Gothelf AB; Hoebers F; Kremer B; Speel EJ; Bowles DW; Raben D; Karam SD; Yu E; Xu W
    Lancet Oncol; 2016 Apr; 17(4):440-451. PubMed ID: 26936027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: can the type of lymphadenectomy condition the long-term results?].
    Di Martino N; Izzo G; Cosenza A; Vicenzo L; Monaco L; Torelli F; Basciotti A; Brillantino A; Marra A
    Suppl Tumori; 2005; 4(3):S84-5. PubMed ID: 16437920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor in gastric cancer patients following D1 resection. Comparison with the current TNM staging system.
    Bouliaris K; Rachiotis G; Diamantis A; Christodoulidis G; Polychronopoulou E; Tepetes K
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1350-1356. PubMed ID: 28433495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effectiveness of the new (7th) UICC N classification in the prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer patients: a comparative study between the 5th/6th and 7th UICC N classification.
    Chae S; Lee A; Lee JH
    Gastric Cancer; 2011 Jun; 14(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 21360132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The RML of lymph node metastasis was superior to the LODDS for evaluating the prognosis of gastric cancer.
    Liu H; Deng J; Zhang R; Hao X; Jiao X; Liang H
    Int J Surg; 2013; 11(5):419-24. PubMed ID: 23541652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anatomical location of metastatic lymph nodes: an indispensable prognostic factor for gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection.
    Zhao B; Zhang J; Zhang J; Chen X; Chen J; Wang Z; Xu H; Huang B
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):185-192. PubMed ID: 29228846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognostic value of lymph node staging in gastric cancer.
    Ichikawa D; Kurioka H; Ueshima Y; Shirono K; Kan K; Shioaki Y; Lee CJ; Hamashima T; Deguchi E; Ikeda E; Mutoh F; Yamagishi H
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2003; 50(49):301-4. PubMed ID: 12630046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Rationality of N3 classification and its sub-classification in TNM classification system for advanced gastric cancer].
    Cheng Y; Huang J; Zhu Z; Xu H
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 19(7):749-55. PubMed ID: 27452751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Study on the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic difference of gastric stump cancer between non-anastomotic site and anastomotic site].
    Chen L; Wei S; Ye Z; Wang Y; Zheng Q; Zhuo C; Xiao J; Zeng Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jan; 20(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 28105623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The rationality of N3 classification in the 7th edition of the International Union Against Cancer TNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinomas: a case-control study.
    Jun KH; Lee JS; Kim JH; Kim JJ; Chin HM; Park SM
    Int J Surg; 2014; 12(9):893-6. PubMed ID: 25026311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.