These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Preferences for three types of alaryngeal speech. Green G; Hults M J Speech Hear Disord; 1982 May; 47(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 7176589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perception of intonational contrasts in alaryngeal speech. Gandour J; Weinberg B J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Mar; 26(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 6865370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the speech acceptability of good and excellent esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers. Trudeau MD J Commun Disord; 1987 Feb; 20(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 3819002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speaking proficiency variations according to method of alaryngeal voicing. Williams SE; Watson JB Laryngoscope; 1987 Jun; 97(6):737-9. PubMed ID: 3586817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acceptability ratings and intelligibility scores of alaryngeal speakers by three listener groups. Bridges A Br J Disord Commun; 1991 Dec; 26(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 1814417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perception of lexical stress in alaryngeal speech. Gandour J; Weinberg B; Garzione B J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Sep; 26(3):418-24. PubMed ID: 6645467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech intelligibility, acceptability, and communication-related quality of life in Chinese alaryngeal speakers. Law IK; Ma EP; Yiu EM Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Jul; 135(7):704-11. PubMed ID: 19620593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An acoustical and perceptual study of vowels produced by alaryngeal speakers of Cantonese. Ng ML; Chu R Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 19299898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Auditory-perceptual scaling and quality of life in tracheoesophageal speakers. Eadie TL; Doyle PC Laryngoscope; 2004 Apr; 114(4):753-9. PubMed ID: 15064636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Individual speaker influence on relative intelligibility of esophageal speech and artificial larynx speech. Kalb MB; Carpenter MA J Speech Hear Disord; 1981 Feb; 46(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 7206682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of speech using artificial larynx and tracheoesophageal puncture with valve in the same speaker. Merwin GE; Goldstein LP; Rothman HB Laryngoscope; 1985 Jun; 95(6):730-4. PubMed ID: 3999908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low-frequency energy deficit in electrolaryngeal speech. Qi YY; Weinberg B J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Dec; 34(6):1250-6. PubMed ID: 1787706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Effects of Contextual Priming and Alaryngeal Speech Mode on Auditory-Perceptual Ratings of Listener Comfort. Failla S; Al-Zanoon N; Smith N; Doyle PC J Voice; 2021 Nov; 35(6):934.e17-934.e23. PubMed ID: 32278613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]