These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32357773)

  • 1. Probabilistic performance estimators for computational chemistry methods: Systematic improvement probability and ranking probability matrix. I. Theory.
    Pernot P; Savin A
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Apr; 152(16):164108. PubMed ID: 32357773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Probabilistic performance estimators for computational chemistry methods: Systematic improvement probability and ranking probability matrix. II. Applications.
    Pernot P; Savin A
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Apr; 152(16):164109. PubMed ID: 32357775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Probabilistic performance estimators for computational chemistry methods: The empirical cumulative distribution function of absolute errors.
    Pernot P; Savin A
    J Chem Phys; 2018 Jun; 148(24):241707. PubMed ID: 29960327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Erratum: Probabilistic performance estimators for computational chemistry methods: Systematic improvement probability and ranking probability matrix. I. Theory [J. Chem. Phys. 152, 164108 (2020)].
    Pernot P; Savin A
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Oct; 153(16):169901. PubMed ID: 33138390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Error Assessment of Computational Models in Chemistry.
    Simm GN; Proppe J; Reiher M
    Chimia (Aarau); 2017 Apr; 71(4):202-208. PubMed ID: 28446337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Novel learning framework (knockoff technique) to evaluate metric ranking algorithms to describe human response to injury.
    Banerjee A; DeVogel N; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S121-S126. PubMed ID: 30570337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Isosurface Visualization of Data with Nonparametric Models for Uncertainty.
    Athawale T; Sakhaee E; Entezari A
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2016 Jan; 22(1):777-86. PubMed ID: 26529727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficiency of analytical and sampling-based uncertainty propagation in intensity-modulated proton therapy.
    Wahl N; Hennig P; Wieser HP; Bangert M
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(14):5790-5807. PubMed ID: 28649976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Epistemic uncertainty in the ranking and categorization of probabilistic safety assessment model elements: issues and findings.
    Borgonovo E
    Risk Anal; 2008 Aug; 28(4):983-1001. PubMed ID: 18554270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the ranking probabilities for partial orders based on random linear extensions.
    Lerche D; Sørensen PB
    Chemosphere; 2003 Dec; 53(8):981-92. PubMed ID: 14505721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Kernel density estimation-based real-time prediction for respiratory motion.
    Ruan D
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):1311-26. PubMed ID: 20134084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ranking metrics in gene set enrichment analysis: do they matter?
    Zyla J; Marczyk M; Weiner J; Polanska J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 18(1):256. PubMed ID: 28499413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic Consideration of Parameter Uncertainty and Variability in Probabilistic Species Sensitivity Distributions.
    Wigger H; Kawecki D; Nowack B; Adam V
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Mar; 16(2):211-222. PubMed ID: 31535755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scaled test statistics and robust standard errors for non-normal data in covariance structure analysis: a Monte Carlo study.
    Chou CP; Bentler PM; Satorra A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 1991 Nov; 44 ( Pt 2)():347-57. PubMed ID: 1772802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are university rankings useful to improve research? A systematic review.
    Vernon MM; Balas EA; Momani S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193762. PubMed ID: 29513762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction uncertainty of density functional approximations for properties of crystals with cubic symmetry.
    Pernot P; Civalleri B; Presti D; Savin A
    J Phys Chem A; 2015 May; 119(21):5288-304. PubMed ID: 25626469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uncertainty analysis based on probability bounds (p-box) approach in probabilistic safety assessment.
    Karanki DR; Kushwaha HS; Verma AK; Ajit S
    Risk Anal; 2009 May; 29(5):662-75. PubMed ID: 19302279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Probabilistic mapping of the antidystonic effect of pallidal neurostimulation: a multicentre imaging study.
    Reich MM; Horn A; Lange F; Roothans J; Paschen S; Runge J; Wodarg F; Pozzi NG; Witt K; Nickl RC; Soussand L; Ewert S; Maltese V; Wittstock M; Schneider GH; Coenen V; Mahlknecht P; Poewe W; Eisner W; Helmers AK; Matthies C; Sturm V; Isaias IU; Krauss JK; Kühn AA; Deuschl G; Volkmann J
    Brain; 2019 May; 142(5):1386-1398. PubMed ID: 30851091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Positional uncertainty of isocontours: condition analysis and probabilistic measures.
    Pöthkow K; Hege HC
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2011 Oct; 17(10):1393-406. PubMed ID: 21041883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of multianalyte proficiency test results by sum of ranking differences, principal component analysis, and hierarchical cluster analysis.
    Škrbić B; Héberger K; Durišić-Mladenović N
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2013 Oct; 405(25):8363-75. PubMed ID: 23912826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.