These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32357775)

  • 1. Probabilistic performance estimators for computational chemistry methods: Systematic improvement probability and ranking probability matrix. II. Applications.
    Pernot P; Savin A
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Apr; 152(16):164109. PubMed ID: 32357775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Probabilistic performance estimators for computational chemistry methods: Systematic improvement probability and ranking probability matrix. I. Theory.
    Pernot P; Savin A
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Apr; 152(16):164108. PubMed ID: 32357773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Probabilistic performance estimators for computational chemistry methods: The empirical cumulative distribution function of absolute errors.
    Pernot P; Savin A
    J Chem Phys; 2018 Jun; 148(24):241707. PubMed ID: 29960327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Erratum: Probabilistic performance estimators for computational chemistry methods: Systematic improvement probability and ranking probability matrix. I. Theory [J. Chem. Phys. 152, 164108 (2020)].
    Pernot P; Savin A
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Oct; 153(16):169901. PubMed ID: 33138390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Erratum: "Probabilistic performance estimators for computational chemistry methods: The empirical cumulative distribution function of absolute errors" [J. Chem. Phys. 148, 241707 (2018)].
    Pernot P; Savin A
    J Chem Phys; 2019 Jun; 150(21):219906. PubMed ID: 31176343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Error Assessment of Computational Models in Chemistry.
    Simm GN; Proppe J; Reiher M
    Chimia (Aarau); 2017 Apr; 71(4):202-208. PubMed ID: 28446337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The transferability limits of static benchmarks.
    Weymuth T; Reiher M
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2022 Jun; 24(24):14692-14698. PubMed ID: 35700515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparative Theoretical and Computational Study on Robust Counterpart Optimization: II. Probabilistic Guarantees on Constraint Satisfaction.
    Li Z; Floudas CA
    Ind Eng Chem Res; 2012; 51(19):6769-6788. PubMed ID: 23329868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Achievable benchmarks of care: the ABCs of benchmarking.
    Weissman NW; Allison JJ; Kiefe CI; Farmer RM; Weaver MT; Williams OD; Child IG; Pemberton JH; Brown KC; Baker CS
    J Eval Clin Pract; 1999 Aug; 5(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 10461579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying achievable benchmarks of care: concepts and methodology.
    Kiefe CI; Weissman NW; Allison JJ; Farmer R; Weaver M; Williams OD
    Int J Qual Health Care; 1998 Oct; 10(5):443-7. PubMed ID: 9828034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probability fold change: a robust computational approach for identifying differentially expressed gene lists.
    Deng X; Xu J; Hui J; Wang C
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Feb; 93(2):124-39. PubMed ID: 18842321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are university rankings useful to improve research? A systematic review.
    Vernon MM; Balas EA; Momani S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193762. PubMed ID: 29513762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computational intelligence for the Balanced Scorecard: studying performance trends of hemodialysis clinics.
    Cattinelli I; Bolzoni E; Chermisi M; Bellocchio F; Barbieri C; Mari F; Amato C; Menzer M; Stopper A; Gatti E
    Artif Intell Med; 2013 Jul; 58(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 23768423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Local response dispersion method. II. Generalized multicenter interactions.
    Sato T; Nakai H
    J Chem Phys; 2010 Nov; 133(19):194101. PubMed ID: 21090848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toward robust adaptive radiation therapy strategies.
    Böck M; Eriksson K; Forsgren A; Hårdemark B
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2054-2065. PubMed ID: 28317129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Epistemic uncertainty in the ranking and categorization of probabilistic safety assessment model elements: issues and findings.
    Borgonovo E
    Risk Anal; 2008 Aug; 28(4):983-1001. PubMed ID: 18554270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantum probability ranking principle for ligand-based virtual screening.
    Al-Dabbagh MM; Salim N; Himmat M; Ahmed A; Saeed F
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Apr; 31(4):365-378. PubMed ID: 28220440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ranking metrics in gene set enrichment analysis: do they matter?
    Zyla J; Marczyk M; Weiner J; Polanska J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 18(1):256. PubMed ID: 28499413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel approach for benchmarking and assessing the performance of state estimators.
    Das L; Kumar G; Rengaswamy R; Srinivasan B
    ISA Trans; 2018 Sep; 80():137-145. PubMed ID: 29958650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.