437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32358648)
21. Mammographic non-dense area and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women: a causal inference approach in a case-control study.
Velásquez García HA; Sobolev BG; Gotay CC; Wilson CM; Lohrisch CA; Lai AS; Aronson KJ; Spinelli JJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jul; 170(1):159-168. PubMed ID: 29516373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Inclusion of Endogenous Plasma Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate and Mammographic Density in Risk Prediction Models for Breast Cancer.
Gabrielson M; Ubhayasekera KA; Acharya SR; Franko MA; Eriksson M; Bergquist J; Czene K; Hall P
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2020 Mar; 29(3):574-581. PubMed ID: 31948996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prediction of Cancer Masking in Screening Mammography Using Density and Textural Features.
Mainprize JG; Alonzo-Proulx O; Alshafeiy TI; Patrie JT; Harvey JA; Yaffe MJ
Acad Radiol; 2019 May; 26(5):608-619. PubMed ID: 30100155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mammographic features associated with interval breast cancers in screening programs.
Boyd NF; Huszti E; Melnichouk O; Martin LJ; Hislop G; Chiarelli A; Yaffe MJ; Minkin S
Breast Cancer Res; 2014 Aug; 16(4):417. PubMed ID: 25346388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Towards personalized screening: Cumulative risk of breast cancer screening outcomes in women with and without a first-degree relative with a history of breast cancer.
Ripping TM; Hubbard RA; Otten JD; den Heeten GJ; Verbeek AL; Broeders MJ
Int J Cancer; 2016 Apr; 138(7):1619-25. PubMed ID: 26537645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Factors Associated with False Positive Results on Screening Mammography in a Population of Predominantly Hispanic Women.
McGuinness JE; Ueng W; Trivedi MS; Yi HS; David R; Vanegas A; Vargas J; Sandoval R; Kukafka R; Crew KD
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2018 Apr; 27(4):446-453. PubMed ID: 29382701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. A clinical model for identifying the short-term risk of breast cancer.
Eriksson M; Czene K; Pawitan Y; Leifland K; Darabi H; Hall P
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Mar; 19(1):29. PubMed ID: 28288659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. New mammography screening performance metrics based on the entire screening episode.
Sprague BL; Miglioretti DL; Lee CI; Perry H; Tosteson AAN; Kerlikowske K
Cancer; 2020 Jul; 126(14):3289-3296. PubMed ID: 32374471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Mammographic texture and risk of breast cancer by tumor type and estrogen receptor status.
Malkov S; Shepherd JA; Scott CG; Tamimi RM; Ma L; Bertrand KA; Couch F; Jensen MR; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Fan B; Norman A; Brandt KR; Pankratz VS; Vachon CM; Kerlikowske K
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Dec; 18(1):122. PubMed ID: 27923387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Global parenchymal texture features based on histograms of oriented gradients improve cancer development risk estimation from healthy breasts.
Pérez-Benito FJ; Signol F; Pérez-Cortés JC; Pollán M; Pérez-Gómez B; Salas-Trejo D; Casals M; Martínez I; LLobet R
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Aug; 177():123-132. PubMed ID: 31319940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Breast cancer risk prediction and individualised screening based on common genetic variation and breast density measurement.
Darabi H; Czene K; Zhao W; Liu J; Hall P; Humphreys K
Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Feb; 14(1):R25. PubMed ID: 22314178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Automated and Clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Density Measures Predict Risk for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers: A Case-Control Study.
Kerlikowske K; Scott CG; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Ma L; Winham S; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Malkov S; Pankratz VS; Cummings SR; Shepherd JA; Brandt KR; Miglioretti DL; Vachon CM
Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jun; 168(11):757-765. PubMed ID: 29710124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of global and local region-based bilateral mammographic feature asymmetry to predict short-term breast cancer risk.
Li Y; Fan M; Cheng H; Zhang P; Zheng B; Li L
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(2):025004. PubMed ID: 29226849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancer.
Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Diao P; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():274. PubMed ID: 25884160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Risk factors and tumor characteristics of interval cancers by mammographic density.
Holm J; Humphreys K; Li J; Ploner A; Cheddad A; Eriksson M; Törnberg S; Hall P; Czene K
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(9):1030-7. PubMed ID: 25646195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. AutoDensity: an automated method to measure mammographic breast density that predicts breast cancer risk and screening outcomes.
Nickson C; Arzhaeva Y; Aitken Z; Elgindy T; Buckley M; Li M; English DR; Kavanagh AM
Breast Cancer Res; 2013; 15(5):R80. PubMed ID: 24020331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Breast cancer risk stratification for mammographic screening: A nation-wide screening cohort of 24,431 women in Singapore.
Ho PJ; Wong FY; Chay WY; Lim EH; Lim ZL; Chia KS; Hartman M; Li J
Cancer Med; 2021 Nov; 10(22):8182-8191. PubMed ID: 34708579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A simulation model investigating the impact of tumor volume doubling time and mammographic tumor detectability on screening outcomes in women aged 40-49 years.
Bailey SL; Sigal BM; Plevritis SK
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Aug; 102(16):1263-71. PubMed ID: 20664027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Risk factors for breast cancer in a cohort of mammographic screening program: a nested case-control study within the FRiCaM study.
Bravi F; Decarli A; Russo AG
Cancer Med; 2018 May; 7(5):2145-2152. PubMed ID: 29654663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of a Deep Learning Risk Score and Standard Mammographic Density Score for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
Dembrower K; Liu Y; Azizpour H; Eklund M; Smith K; Lindholm P; Strand F
Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):265-272. PubMed ID: 31845842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
