188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32358793)
1. Grading of prostate cancer: the impact of including intraductal carcinoma on the overall Grade Group assigned in diagnostic biopsies.
Chen-Maxwell D; Prendeville S
Histopathology; 2020 Sep; 77(3):503-507. PubMed ID: 32358793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate: A Guide for the Practicing Pathologist.
Varma M
Adv Anat Pathol; 2021 Jul; 28(4):276-287. PubMed ID: 33990497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Head to head: should the intraductal component of invasive prostate cancer be graded?
Varma M; Epstein JI
Histopathology; 2021 Jan; 78(2):231-239. PubMed ID: 32692448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate: a critical re-appraisal.
Varma M; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Kristiansen G
Virchows Arch; 2019 May; 474(5):525-534. PubMed ID: 30825003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Grade group 4 prostate cancer without intraductal carcinoma on biopsy is more likely to be downgraded on prostatectomy than with intraductal carcinoma.
Trabzonlu L; Chaiprasit T; Kontosis A; Picken M
Virchows Arch; 2024 Mar; 484(3):517-520. PubMed ID: 38267757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Isolated Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate in Prostatectomy Specimens: Report of 2 Cases and Review of the Literature.
Grypari IM; Logotheti S; Lazaris AC; Kallidonis P; Fokaefs E; Melachrinou M; Zolota V; Tzelepi V
Int J Surg Pathol; 2020 Dec; 28(8):918-924. PubMed ID: 32456482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate cancer with comedonecrosis is frequently, but not exclusively, intraductal carcinoma: a need for reappraisal of grading criteria.
Madan R; Deebajah M; Alanee S; Gupta NS; Carskadon S; Palanisamy N; Williamson SR
Histopathology; 2019 Jun; 74(7):1081-1087. PubMed ID: 30720899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is an aggressive form of invasive carcinoma and should be graded.
Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Srigley JR; Billis A; Bostwick DG; Camparo P; Cheng L; Clouston D; Denham J; Furusato B; Hartmann A; Jufe L; Kench J; Kenwright DN; Kristiansen G; Leite KRM; MacLennan GT; Merrimen J; Moch H; Oxley J; Pan CC; Paner G; Ro J; Sesterhenn IAM; Shanks J; Thunders M; Tsuzuki T; Wheeler T; Yaxley JW; Varma M
Pathology; 2020 Feb; 52(2):192-196. PubMed ID: 31843189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Appl1, Sortilin and Syndecan-1 immunohistochemistry on intraductal carcinoma of the prostate provides evidence of retrograde spread.
Sorvina A; Martini C; Prabhakaran S; Logan JM; S-Y Ung B; Moore C; Johnson IRD; Lazniewska J; Tewari P; Malone V; Brooks RD; Hickey SM; Caruso MC; Klebe S; Karageorgos L; O'Leary JJ; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Brooks DA
Pathology; 2023 Oct; 55(6):792-799. PubMed ID: 37422404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of prostatic adenocarcinoma Gleason 5 and intraductal carcinoma of the prostate with tumor necrosis. A morphometric study.
Acosta AM; Vormittag E; Al Rasheed MRH; Sharif A; Mon KS; Kajdacsy-Balla A; Mohapatra G
Pathol Res Pract; 2018 Oct; 214(10):1681-1685. PubMed ID: 30195638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate: Extreme Nuclear Size Is Not a Diagnostic Parameter.
Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Yaxley JW; Johannsen S; Egevad L
Am J Surg Pathol; 2021 Nov; 45(11):1527-1533. PubMed ID: 34265803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Grading Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate; ISUP versus GUPS Recommendations.
Shahid A; Mushtaq S; Maqbool H; Hassan U; Hussain M; Syed M
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2023 Apr; 33(4):396-399. PubMed ID: 37190710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The 2019 Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) White Paper on Contemporary Grading of Prostate Cancer.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Fine SW; Algaba F; Aron M; Baydar DE; Beltran AL; Brimo F; Cheville JC; Colecchia M; Comperat E; da Cunha IW; Delprado W; DeMarzo AM; Giannico GA; Gordetsky JB; Guo CC; Hansel DE; Hirsch MS; Huang J; Humphrey PA; Jimenez RE; Khani F; Kong Q; Kryvenko ON; Kunju LP; Lal P; Latour M; Lotan T; Maclean F; Magi-Galluzzi C; Mehra R; Menon S; Miyamoto H; Montironi R; Netto GJ; Nguyen JK; Osunkoya AO; Parwani A; Robinson BD; Rubin MA; Shah RB; So JS; Takahashi H; Tavora F; Tretiakova MS; True L; Wobker SE; Yang XJ; Zhou M; Zynger DL; Trpkov K
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2021 Apr; 145(4):461-493. PubMed ID: 32589068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraductal carcinoma has a minimal impact on Grade Group assignment in prostate cancer biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Rijstenberg LL; Hansum T; Hollemans E; Kweldam CF; Kümmerlin IP; Bangma CH; van der Kwast TH; Roobol MJ; van Leenders GJLH
Histopathology; 2020 Nov; 77(5):742-748. PubMed ID: 32542746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate Biopsy Specimens With Gleason 3+3=6 and Intraductal Carcinoma: Radical Prostatectomy Findings and Clinical Outcomes.
Khani F; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2015 Oct; 39(10):1383-9. PubMed ID: 26076065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for Initial Prostate Biopsy by Incorporating the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading and Cribriform growth.
Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; van der Kwast T; Kümmerlin IP; Kweldam CF; van Leenders GJLH
Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 28162815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
