These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32359241)

  • 21. Voice emotion recognition by cochlear-implanted children and their normally-hearing peers.
    Chatterjee M; Zion DJ; Deroche ML; Burianek BA; Limb CJ; Goren AP; Kulkarni AM; Christensen JA
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():151-62. PubMed ID: 25448167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Lexical Effects on the Perceived Clarity of Noise-Vocoded Speech in Younger and Older Listeners.
    Tamati TN; Sevich VA; Clausing EM; Moberly AC
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():837644. PubMed ID: 35432072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spatial release from masking with noise-vocoded speech.
    Freyman RL; Balakrishnan U; Helfer KS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1627-37. PubMed ID: 19045654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech perception in simulated electric hearing exploits information-bearing acoustic change.
    Stilp CE; Goupell MJ; Kluender KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):EL136-41. PubMed ID: 23363194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.
    Hunter CR; Pisoni DB
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):378-389. PubMed ID: 28945658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Many tasks, same outcome: Role of training task on learning and maintenance of noise-vocoded speech.
    Drouin JR; Theodore RM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Aug; 152(2):981. PubMed ID: 36050170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded speech.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 21206363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Release from informational masking in a monaural competing-speech task with vocoded copies of the maskers presented contralaterally.
    Bernstein JG; Iyer N; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):702-13. PubMed ID: 25698005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of age on melody and timbre perception in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing.
    Arehart KH; Croghan NB; Muralimanohar RK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 24441739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
    Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing.
    Oxenham AJ; Kreft HA
    Trends Hear; 2014 Oct; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Benefits of preserving stationary and time-varying formant structure in alternative representations of speech: implications for cochlear implants.
    Nittrouer S; Lowenstein JH; Wucinich T; Tarr E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Oct; 136(4):1845-56. PubMed ID: 25324085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Top-down restoration of speech in cochlear-implant users.
    Bhargava P; Gaudrain E; Başkent D
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():113-23. PubMed ID: 24368138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perception of vocoded speech in domestic dogs.
    Mallikarjun A; Shroads E; Newman RS
    Anim Cogn; 2024 Apr; 27(1):34. PubMed ID: 38625429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of Temporal Envelope Cutoff Frequency, Number of Channels, and Carrier Type on Brainstem Neural Representation of Pitch in Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Aug; 65(8):3146-3164. PubMed ID: 35944032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differential responses to spectrally degraded speech within human auditory cortex: An intracranial electrophysiology study.
    Nourski KV; Steinschneider M; Rhone AE; Kovach CK; Kawasaki H; Howard MA
    Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():53-65. PubMed ID: 30500619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.
    Qazi OU; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():79-87. PubMed ID: 23396271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Children's recognition of spectrally degraded cartoon voices.
    van Heugten M; Volkova A; Trehub SE; Schellenberg EG
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 24213020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.