100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32360291)
1. Impact of C-LEG on mobility, satisfaction and quality of life in a multicenter cohort of femoral amputees.
Lansade C; Chiesa G; Paysant J; Vicaut E; Cristina MC; Ménager D
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2021 Jan; 64(1):101386. PubMed ID: 32360291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mobility and satisfaction with a microprocessor-controlled knee in moderately active amputees: A multi-centric randomized crossover trial.
Lansade C; Vicaut E; Paysant J; Ménager D; Cristina MC; Braatz F; Domayer S; Pérennou D; Chiesa G
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2018 Sep; 61(5):278-285. PubMed ID: 29753888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of the microprocessor-controlled knee C-Leg in transfemoral amputees with and without diabetes mellitus.
Kuhlmann A; Krüger H; Seidinger S; Hahn A
Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Apr; 21(3):437-449. PubMed ID: 31897813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benefits of the Genium microprocessor controlled prosthetic knee on ambulation, mobility, activities of daily living and quality of life: a systematic literature review.
Mileusnic MP; Rettinger L; Highsmith MJ; Hahn A
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Jul; 16(5):453-464. PubMed ID: 31469023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of transfemoral amputees using a passive microprocessor-controlled knee versus an active powered microprocessor-controlled knee for level walking.
Creylman V; Knippels I; Janssen P; Biesbrouck E; Lechler K; Peeraer L
Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Dec; 15(Suppl 3):142. PubMed ID: 28105945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of function, performance, and preference as transfemoral amputees transition from mechanical to microprocessor control of the prosthetic knee.
Hafner BJ; Willingham LL; Buell NC; Allyn KJ; Smith DG
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 17270519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survey of transfemoral amputee experience and priorities for the user-centered design of powered robotic transfemoral prostheses.
Fanciullacci C; McKinney Z; Monaco V; Milandri G; Davalli A; Sacchetti R; Laffranchi M; De Michieli L; Baldoni A; Mazzoni A; Paternò L; Rosini E; Reale L; Trecate F; Crea S; Vitiello N; Gruppioni E
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Dec; 18(1):168. PubMed ID: 34863213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety and function of a prototype microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis for low active transfemoral amputees switching from a mechanic knee prosthesis: a pilot study.
Hasenoehrl T; Schmalz T; Windhager R; Domayer S; Dana S; Ambrozy C; Palma S; Crevenna R
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Feb; 13(2):157-165. PubMed ID: 28399722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. First results concerning the safety, walking, and satisfaction with an innovative, microprocessor-controlled four-axes prosthetic foot.
Hahn A; Sreckovic I; Reiter S; Mileusnic M
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Jun; 42(3):350-356. PubMed ID: 29400252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Functional assessment and satisfaction of transfemoral amputees with low mobility (FASTK2): A clinical trial of microprocessor-controlled vs. non-microprocessor-controlled knees.
Kaufman KR; Bernhardt KA; Symms K
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Oct; 58():116-122. PubMed ID: 30077128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of nonmicroprocessor knee mechanism versus C-Leg on Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire, stumbles, falls, walking tests, stair descent, and knee preference.
Kahle JT; Highsmith MJ; Hubbard SL
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2008; 45(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 18566922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rehabilitation evaluation of the newly developed polymeric based passive polycentric knee joint.
Arun S; Marbaniang B; Borgohain B; Kanagaraj S
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Nov; 15(8):871-877. PubMed ID: 31172818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The comparison of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor- controlled prosthetic knee under different walking speeds: A randomized cross-over trial.
Cao W; Yu H; Zhao W; Meng Q; Chen W
Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(4):581-592. PubMed ID: 29710741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does having a computerized prosthetic knee influence cognitive performance during amputee walking?
Williams RM; Turner AP; Orendurff M; Segal AD; Klute GK; Pecoraro J; Czerniecki J
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jul; 87(7):989-94. PubMed ID: 16813788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A non-invasive wearable sensory leg neuroprosthesis: mechanical, electrical and functional validation.
Basla C; Chee L; Valle G; Raspopovic S
J Neural Eng; 2022 Jan; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 34915454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Gait termination on a declined surface in trans-femoral amputees: Impact of using microprocessor-controlled limb system.
Abdulhasan ZM; Scally AJ; Buckley JG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Aug; 57():35-41. PubMed ID: 29908391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of a stance phase microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis on level walking in lower functioning individuals with a transfemoral amputation.
Eberly VJ; Mulroy SJ; Gronley JK; Perry J; Yule WJ; Burnfield JM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 24135259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Functional added value of microprocessor-controlled knee joints in daily life performance of Medicare Functional Classification Level-2 amputees.
Theeven P; Hemmen B; Rings F; Meys G; Brink P; Smeets R; Seelen H
J Rehabil Med; 2011 Oct; 43(10):906-15. PubMed ID: 21947182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Energy expenditure and activity of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees.
Kaufman KR; Levine JA; Brey RH; McCrady SK; Padgett DJ; Joyner MJ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Jul; 89(7):1380-5. PubMed ID: 18586142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mobility, prosthesis use and health-related quality of life of bilateral lower limb amputees from the 2008 Sichuan earthquake.
Li WS; Chan SY; Chau WW; Law SW; Chan KM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Feb; 43(1):104-111. PubMed ID: 30112979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
