BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32361718)

  • 1. Spectrum of false positive
    Usmani S; Ahmed N; Muzaffar S; Marafi F; Esmail A; Gnanasegaran G; Van den Wyngaert T
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2020; 23(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 32361718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The clinical significance of incidental soft tissue uptake on whole body
    Usmani S; Gnanasegaran G; Marafi F; Esmail A; Ahmed N; Van den Wyngaert T
    Clin Radiol; 2019 Feb; 74(2):95-110. PubMed ID: 30340750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Normal bone and soft tissue distribution of fluorine-18-sodium fluoride and artifacts on 18F-NaF PET/CT bone scan: a pictorial review.
    Sarikaya I; Elgazzar AH; Sarikaya A; Alfeeli M
    Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Oct; 38(10):810-819. PubMed ID: 28777220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Therapy-induced bone changes in oncology imaging with
    Ahmed N; Sadeq A; Marafi F; Gnanasegaran G; Usmani S
    Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Apr; 36(4):329-339. PubMed ID: 35218508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Role of 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET/CT Bone Scans in the Diagnosis of Metastatic Bone Disease from Breast and Prostate Cancer.
    Kulshrestha RK; Vinjamuri S; England A; Nightingale J; Hogg P
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2016 Dec; 44(4):217-222. PubMed ID: 27634981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A proof-of-concept study analyzing the clinical utility of fluorine-18-sodium fluoride PET-CT in skeletal staging of oncology patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis.
    Usmani S; Marafi F; Esmail A; Ahmed N
    Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Dec; 38(12):1067-1075. PubMed ID: 28953207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in sodium fluoride-18 uptake in the normal skeleton depending on the location and characteristics of the bone.
    Nawata S; Kaneta T; Ogawa M; Ishiwata Y; Kobayashi N; Shishikura-Hino A; Yoshida K; Inaba Y; Saito T; Inoue T
    Nuklearmedizin; 2017 Jun; 56(3):91-96. PubMed ID: 28488727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uptake of Radium-223 Dichloride and Early [
    Letellier A; Johnson AC; Kit NH; Savigny JF; Batalla A; Parienti JJ; Aide N
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2018 Jun; 20(3):482-491. PubMed ID: 29027074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10.
    Munhoz L; de Brito MAD; Arita ES; Sapienza MT
    Oral Radiol; 2021 Oct; 37(4):669-676. PubMed ID: 33428105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic Challenge of Staging Metastatic Bone Disease in the Morbidly Obese Patients: A Primary Study Evaluating the Usefulness of 18F-Sodium Fluoride (NaF) PET-CT.
    Usmani S; Marafi F; Ahmed N; Esmail A; Al Kandari F; Van den Wyngaert T
    Clin Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 42(11):829-836. PubMed ID: 28872551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Atlas of Extraosseous Findings Detected by 18F-NaF PET/CT Bone Scan.
    Woodhead GJ; Avery RJ; Kuo PH
    Clin Nucl Med; 2017 Dec; 42(12):930-938. PubMed ID: 29036001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Skeletal Metastases and Benign Mimics on NaF PET/CT: A Pictorial Review.
    Panagiotidis E; Lam K; Mistry A; Seshadri N; Vinjamuri S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jul; 211(1):W64-W74. PubMed ID: 29702023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technical feasibility, radiation dosimetry and clinical use of
    Usmani S; Van den Wyngaert T; Ahmed N; Marafi F; Esmail A; Al Kandari F; Al Nuaimi M; Gnanasegaran G
    Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 32(9):594-601. PubMed ID: 30019285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation of fluorine 18-labeled sodium fluoride uptake and arterial calcification on whole-body PET/CT in cancer patients.
    Dai D; Chuang HH; Macapinlac HA; Li T; Pan T
    Nucl Med Commun; 2019 Jun; 40(6):604-610. PubMed ID: 30688757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of
    Yellanki DP; Kothekar E; Al-Zaghal A; Cheng N; Werner TJ; Høilund-Carlsen PF; Alavi A
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2018; 21(3):181-185. PubMed ID: 30411728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    Langsteger W; Rezaee A; Pirich C; Beheshti M
    Semin Nucl Med; 2016 Nov; 46(6):491-501. PubMed ID: 27825429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The clinical effectiveness of reconstructing
    Usmani S; Ahmed N; Gnanasegaran G; Rasheed R; Marafi F; Alnaaimi M; Omar M; Musbah A; Al Kandari F; De Schepper S; Van den Wyngaert T
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 94(1120):20210043. PubMed ID: 33571003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnosis and Monitoring of Osteoporosis with Total-Body
    Zhang V; Koa B; Borja AJ; Padmanhabhan S; Bhattaru A; Raynor WY; Rojulpote C; Seraj SM; Werner TJ; Rajapakse C; Alavi A; Revheim ME
    PET Clin; 2020 Oct; 15(4):487-496. PubMed ID: 32768370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The value of quantitative analysis in
    Lapa P; Marques M; Costa G; Lima JP
    Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2017; 36(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 27793635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.