126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32361820)
1. Radiation dosimetry analyses of radiographic imaging systems used for orthodontic treatment: comparison among child, adolescent, and adult patients.
Lee KS; Nam OH; Kim GT; Choi SC; Choi YS; Hwang EH
Oral Radiol; 2021 Apr; 37(2):245-250. PubMed ID: 32361820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring absorbed dose for i-CAT CBCT examinations in child, adolescent and adult phantoms.
Choi E; Ford NL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(6):20150018. PubMed ID: 25785822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dose distributions in adult and child head phantoms for panoramic and cone beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint.
Iskanderani D; Nilsson M; Alstergren P; Hellén-Halme K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Aug; 130(2):200-208. PubMed ID: 32094027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can modifying shielding, field of view, and exposure settings make the effective dose of a cone-beam computed tomography comparable to traditional radiographs used for orthodontic diagnosis?
Ting S; Attaia D; Johnson KB; Kossa SS; Friedland B; Allareddy V; Masoud MI
Angle Orthod; 2020 Sep; 90(5):655-664. PubMed ID: 33378479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetry analysis of panoramic-imaging devices in different-sized phantoms.
Wahid MA; Choi E; MacDonald DS; Ford NL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 28300383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography.
Chau AC; Fung K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):559-65. PubMed ID: 19168378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms.
Theodorakou C; Walker A; Horner K; Pauwels R; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R;
Br J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 85(1010):153-60. PubMed ID: 22308220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Absorbed doses for patients undergoing panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography and CBCT.
Wrzesień M; Olszewski J
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2017 Jul; 30(5):705-713. PubMed ID: 28584324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics.
Signorelli L; Patcas R; Peltomäki T; Schätzle M
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 26747662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of the effective radiation doses from cone beam computed tomography and plain radiography for sialography.
Jadu F; Yaffe MJ; Lam EW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Jul; 39(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 20587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT.
Tsiklakis K; Donta C; Gavala S; Karayianni K; Kamenopoulou V; Hourdakis CJ
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Dec; 56(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 15978765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Dosimetry of cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography scanning for temporal bone].
Xie XY; Zhang ZY; Wang Z; Yin GX; Jia SM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 98(23):1837-1840. PubMed ID: 29925165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Hand-wrist, knee, and foot-ankle dosimetry and image quality measurements of a novel extremity imaging unit providing CBCT and 2D imaging options.
Ludlow JB
Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):4955-4963. PubMed ID: 30229941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ESTIMATION OF EFFECTIVE DOSE OF DENTAL X-RAY DEVICES.
Qiang W; Qiang F; Lin L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jun; 183(4):417-421. PubMed ID: 30169836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations.
Granlund C; Thilander-Klang A; Ylhan B; Lofthag-Hansen S; Ekestubbe A
Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20151052. PubMed ID: 27452261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of adult and child radiation equivalent doses from 2 dental cone-beam computed tomography units.
Al Najjar A; Colosi D; Dauer LT; Prins R; Patchell G; Branets I; Goren AD; Faber RD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):784-92. PubMed ID: 23726328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of absorbed doses and organ doses measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters and Gafchromic film for cone beam computed tomography examination of the posterior mandibular region in a head phantom.
Cederhag J; Kadesjö N; Nilsson M; Alstergren P; Shi XQ; Hellén-Halme K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2023 Dec; 136(6):769-776. PubMed ID: 37625926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation.
Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Bumann A; Visser H; Hirsch E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):640.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18456133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols.
Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G
Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
