These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32361862)

  • 1. Interpretation of machine learning models using shapley values: application to compound potency and multi-target activity predictions.
    Rodríguez-Pérez R; Bajorath J
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Oct; 34(10):1013-1026. PubMed ID: 32361862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpretation of Compound Activity Predictions from Complex Machine Learning Models Using Local Approximations and Shapley Values.
    Rodríguez-Pérez R; Bajorath J
    J Med Chem; 2020 Aug; 63(16):8761-8777. PubMed ID: 31512867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of multi-target deep neural network models for compound potency prediction under increasingly challenging test conditions.
    Rodríguez-Pérez R; Bajorath J
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Mar; 35(3):285-295. PubMed ID: 33598870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Classification and Explanation for Intrusion Detection System Based on Ensemble Trees and SHAP Method.
    Le TT; Kim H; Kang H; Kim H
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 35161899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Explaining multivariate molecular diagnostic tests via Shapley values.
    Roder J; Maguire L; Georgantas R; Roder H
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Jul; 21(1):211. PubMed ID: 34238309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Calculation of exact Shapley values for support vector machines with Tanimoto kernel enables model interpretation.
    Feldmann C; Bajorath J
    iScience; 2022 Sep; 25(9):105023. PubMed ID: 36105596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Calculation of exact Shapley values for explaining support vector machine models using the radial basis function kernel.
    Mastropietro A; Feldmann C; Bajorath J
    Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):19561. PubMed ID: 37949930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Explaining Multiclass Compound Activity Predictions Using Counterfactuals and Shapley Values.
    Lamens A; Bajorath J
    Molecules; 2023 Jul; 28(14):. PubMed ID: 37513472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Explanation of machine learning models using shapley additive explanation and application for real data in hospital.
    Nohara Y; Matsumoto K; Soejima H; Nakashima N
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Feb; 214():106584. PubMed ID: 34942412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An explainable predictive model for suicide attempt risk using an ensemble learning and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) approach.
    Nordin N; Zainol Z; Mohd Noor MH; Chan LF
    Asian J Psychiatr; 2023 Jan; 79():103316. PubMed ID: 36395702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. GPUTreeShap: massively parallel exact calculation of SHAP scores for tree ensembles.
    Mitchell R; Frank E; Holmes G
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2022; 8():e880. PubMed ID: 35494875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Machine Learning Models for Predicting Influential Factors of Early Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Registry-Based Study.
    Su PY; Wei YC; Luo H; Liu CH; Huang WY; Chen KF; Lin CP; Wei HY; Lee TH
    JMIR Med Inform; 2022 Mar; 10(3):e32508. PubMed ID: 35072631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Verifying explainability of a deep learning tissue classifier trained on RNA-seq data.
    Yap M; Johnston RL; Foley H; MacDonald S; Kondrashova O; Tran KA; Nones K; Koufariotis LT; Bean C; Pearson JV; Trzaskowski M; Waddell N
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):2641. PubMed ID: 33514769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Explaining machine-learning models for gamma-ray detection and identification.
    Bandstra MS; Curtis JC; Ghawaly JM; Jones AC; Joshi THY
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(6):e0286829. PubMed ID: 37339151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survival prediction of glioblastoma patients using modern deep learning and machine learning techniques.
    Babaei Rikan S; Sorayaie Azar A; Naemi A; Bagherzadeh Mohasefi J; Pirnejad H; Wiil UK
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):2371. PubMed ID: 38287149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An artificial neural network-pharmacokinetic model and its interpretation using Shapley additive explanations.
    Ogami C; Tsuji Y; Seki H; Kawano H; To H; Matsumoto Y; Hosono H
    CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol; 2021 Jul; 10(7):760-768. PubMed ID: 33955705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fast Hierarchical Games for Image Explanations.
    Teneggi J; Luster A; Sulam J
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2023 Apr; 45(4):4494-4503. PubMed ID: 35816535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast cancer molecular subtype prediction: Improving interpretability of complex machine-learning models based on multiparametric-MRI features using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) methodology.
    Crombé A; Kataoka M
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2024 May; 105(5):161-162. PubMed ID: 38365542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stable feature selection utilizing Graph Convolutional Neural Network and Layer-wise Relevance Propagation for biomarker discovery in breast cancer.
    Chereda H; Leha A; Beißbarth T
    Artif Intell Med; 2024 May; 151():102840. PubMed ID: 38658129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the interpretability of machine learning methods in crash frequency modeling and crash modification factor development.
    Wen X; Xie Y; Jiang L; Li Y; Ge T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Apr; 168():106617. PubMed ID: 35202941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.