186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32362580)
21. Spontaneous pre-labour rupture of membranes at term: immediate versus delayed induction of labour.
Omole-Ohonsi A; Ashimi A; Adeleke S
West Afr J Med; 2009 May; 28(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 20306730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Dällenbach P; Boulvain M; Viardot C; Irion O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 188(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 12548212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Foley Catheter or Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor in Women with Term Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Multicenter Trial.
Kruit H; Tihtonen K; Raudaskoski T; Ulander VM; Aitokallio-Tallberg A; Heikinheimo O; Paavonen J; Rahkonen L
Am J Perinatol; 2016 Jul; 33(9):866-72. PubMed ID: 27031055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Balancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta-analysis comparing 25 versus 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour.
McMaster K; Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM
BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 24989790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Slow-release vaginal insert of misoprostol versus orally administrated solution of misoprostol for the induction of labour in primiparous term pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial.
Wallström T; Strandberg M; Gemzell-Danielsson K; Pilo C; Jarnbert-Pettersson H; Friman-Mathiasson M; Wiberg-Itzel E
BJOG; 2019 Aug; 126(9):1148-1155. PubMed ID: 30989788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Intravaginal misoprostol vs. expectant management in premature rupture of membranes with low Bishop scores at term.
Ozden S; Delikara MN; Avci A; Fiçicioglu C
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2002 May; 77(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 12031560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Misoprostol compared with prostaglandin E2 for labour induction in women at term with intact membranes and unfavourable cervix: a systematic review.
Crane JM; Butler B; Young DC; Hannah ME
BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1366-76. PubMed ID: 17081181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial.
Lapuente-Ocamica O; Ugarte L; Lopez-Picado A; Sanchez-Refoyo F; Lasa IL; Echevarria O; Álvarez-Sala J; Fariñas A; Bilbao I; Barbero L; Vicarregui J; Hernanz Chaves R; Paz Corral D; Lopez-Lopez JA
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Jan; 19(1):14. PubMed ID: 30621614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for labour induction.
Rasheed R; Alam AA; Younus S; Raza F
J Pak Med Assoc; 2007 Aug; 57(8):404-7. PubMed ID: 17902524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Misoprostol versus prostaglandin E2 gel for labor induction in premature rupture of membranes after 34 weeks of pregnancy.
Zhang Y; Wang J; Yu Y; Xie C; Xiao M; Ren L
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Sep; 130(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 26118328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: An individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Patabendige M; Chan F; Vayssiere C; Ehlinger V; Van Gemund N; le Cessie S; Prager M; Marions L; Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Young DC; Le Roux PA; Gregson S; Waterstone M; Rolnik DL; Mol BW; Li W
BJOG; 2024 Aug; 131(9):1167-1180. PubMed ID: 38425020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Misoprostol for labor induction in women with term premature rupture of membranes: a meta-analysis.
Lin MG; Nuthalapaty FS; Carver AR; Case AS; Ramsey PS
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 106(3):593-601. PubMed ID: 16135593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Oral misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for active management of premature rupture of membranes at term.
Nagpal MB; Raghunandan C; Saili A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 106(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 19375704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Methods for assessing pre-induction cervical ripening.
Ezebialu IU; Eke AC; Eleje GU; Nwachukwu CE
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 2015(6):CD010762. PubMed ID: 26068943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Randomization of two dosing regimens of vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction in a low resource setting.
Adeniyi AA; Odukogbe AA; Olayemi A; Oladokun O; Adeniji AO; Aimakhu CO; Enakpene C
Niger J Clin Pract; 2014; 17(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 24714004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.
Gomez HB; Hoffman MK; Caplan R; Ruhstaller K; Young MHH; Sciscione AC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 224(5):524.e1-524.e8. PubMed ID: 33617796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Maternal and neonatal outcomes with mechanical cervical dilation plus misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone for cervical ripening; a systematic review of literature and metaanalysis.
Nasioudis D; Kim SW; Schoen C; Levine LD
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2019 May; 1(2):101-111. PubMed ID: 33345815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour.
Chen W; Xue J; Peprah MK; Wen SW; Walker M; Gao Y; Tang Y
BJOG; 2016 Feb; 123(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 26538408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Misoprostol for induction of labour to terminate pregnancy in the second or third trimester for women with a fetal anomaly or after intrauterine fetal death.
Dodd JM; Crowther CA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Apr; 2010(4):CD004901. PubMed ID: 20393941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
