These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3236319)

  • 1. Effects of sphygmomanometer type and position of the arm on blood pressure measurement.
    Parr GD; Poole PH
    J Hum Hypertens; 1988 Oct; 2(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 3236319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
    Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Both body and arm position significantly influence blood pressure measurement.
    Netea RT; Lenders JW; Smits P; Thien T
    J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Jul; 17(7):459-62. PubMed ID: 12821952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparative study of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitors with standard zero and random zero sphygmomanometers].
    Tislér A; Barna I; Châtel R
    Orv Hetil; 1994 Jun; 135(26):1415-9. PubMed ID: 8028897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of a heart level pillow on the result of blood pressure measurement.
    Ljungvall P; Thorvinger B; Thulin T
    J Hum Hypertens; 1989 Dec; 3(6):471-4. PubMed ID: 2607522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
    Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of blood pressure instrument and cuff side on blood pressure reading in pregnant women in the lateral recumbent position.
    Kinsella SM
    Int J Obstet Anesth; 2006 Oct; 15(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 16945515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of Heine Gamma G7 (G5) and XXL-LF aneroid devices for blood pressure measurement.
    Dorigatti F; Bonso E; Zanier A; Palatini P
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 17303985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement.
    Kobalava ZD; Kotovskaya YV; Babaeva LA; Moiseev VS
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 16534410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of the OMRON M7 (HEM-780-E) blood pressure measuring device in a population requiring large cuff use according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
    El Feghali RN; Topouchian JA; Pannier BM; El Assaad HA; Asmar RG;
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 17496467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Arm position and blood pressure: a risk factor for hypertension?
    Mourad A; Carney S; Gillies A; Jones B; Nanra R; Trevillian P
    J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Jun; 17(6):389-95. PubMed ID: 12764401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The position of the arm during blood pressure measurement in sitting position.
    Adiyaman A; Verhoeff R; Lenders JW; Deinum J; Thien T
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Dec; 11(6):309-13. PubMed ID: 17106314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated versus manual blood pressure measurement: a randomized crossover trial.
    Heinemann M; Sellick K; Rickard C; Reynolds P; McGrail M
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2008 Aug; 14(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 18715391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: factors affecting the measurements].
    Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Demir K; Doğan Y; Koç F; Zengin K; Ari H
    Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2008 Jun; 36(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 18765967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of the Omron 637IT wrist blood pressure measuring device with a position sensor according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
    Altunkan S; Oztaş K; Altunkan E
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 16534409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer versus the standard sphygmomanometer: an investigation of mechanisms.
    Kinirons MT; Maskrey VL; Lawson M; Swift CG; Jackson SH
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Jul; 9(7):571-3. PubMed ID: 7562887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer underestimate blood pressure, and by how much?
    Mackie A; Whincup P; McKinnon M
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 May; 9(5):337-43. PubMed ID: 7623370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of normal and large sphygmomanometer cuffs using the Omron 705CP.
    Aylett M; Marples G; Jones K; Rhodes D
    J Hum Hypertens; 2001 Feb; 15(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 11317193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
    Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Oscillometric wrist devices: comparison with the standard mercury sphygmomanometer and estimate of the "supine" error].
    Caridi G; Zoccali C; Enia G
    G Ital Nefrol; 2003; 20(6):589-91. PubMed ID: 14732910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.