190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3236350)
21. The fetus as parasite and mushroom: Judith Jarvis Thomson's defense of abortion.
Meilaender G
Linacre Q; 1979 May; 46(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 11660920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The pregnant woman and the good Samaritan: can a woman have a duty to undergo a caesarean section?
Scott R
Oxf J Leg Stud; 2000; 20(3):407-36. PubMed ID: 12452142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Court-ordered cesareans: a growing concern for indigent women.
Daniels JA
Clgh Rev; 1988 Feb; 21(9):1064-71. PubMed ID: 11649972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Abortion and euthanasia: recent developments of the law.
Horan DJ
Forum; 1977; 12(4):960-79. PubMed ID: 11663978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Court-ordered cesarean sections. A judicial standard for resolving the conflict between fetal interests and maternal rights.
Noble-Allgire AM
J Leg Med; 1989 Mar; 10(1):211-49. PubMed ID: 2651546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Abortion and distortion of justice in the law.
Dickens BM
Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):395-406. PubMed ID: 2628655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Abortion logic and paternal responsibilities: one more look at Judith Thomson's "A defense of abortion.
Pavlischek KJ
Public Aff Q; 1993 Oct; 7(4):341-61. PubMed ID: 11656264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The moral status of the near-term fetus.
Strong C; Anderson G
J Med Ethics; 1989 Mar; 15(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 2926783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Raising questions about society's "duty to rescue" the unborn.
Suziedelis AK
Health Care Ethics USA; 2004; 12(1):E3. PubMed ID: 15685768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. An ethics ensemble: abortion, Thomson, Finnis and the case of the violin-player.
Williams M
Ratio Juris; 2004 Sep; 17(3):381-97. PubMed ID: 16602213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Abortion, autonomy, and control over one's body.
Fischer JM
Soc Philos Policy; 2003; 20(2):286-306. PubMed ID: 14696605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The fetus as a patient: emerging rights as a person?
Lenow JL
Am J Law Med; 1983; 9(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 6638018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fetal rights and maternal rights: is there a conflict?
Rogers S
Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):456-69. PubMed ID: 11651100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Thomson's violinist and conjoined twins.
Himma KE
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1999; 8(4):428-35; discussion 435-9. PubMed ID: 10513300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Can a pregnant woman morally refuse fetal surgery?
Knopoff KA
Calif Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 79(2):499-540. PubMed ID: 11659841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Abortion and self-defense.
Davis N
Philos Public Aff; 1984; 13(3):175-207. PubMed ID: 11655659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Lack of consent although informed: fetal neglect.
Reece SA; Reece EA
Med Trial Tech Q; 1985; 32(2):130-44. PubMed ID: 11649199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Abortion and some philosophers: a critical examination.
Schwarz SD; Tacelli RK
Public Aff Q; 1989 Apr; 3(2):81-98. PubMed ID: 11650276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Two moral strategies regarding abortion.
Korcz KA
J Soc Philos; 2002; 33(4):581-605. PubMed ID: 16619462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
