These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32363787)

  • 1. Do we need a 200 μg misoprostol vaginal insert? A retrospective cohort study comparing the misoprostol vaginal insert to oral misoprostol.
    Wegener S; Koenigbauer JT; Laesser C; Metz M; Pech L; Kummer J; Daut J; Jarchau U; Wegener V; Hellmeyer L
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Jun; 46(6):851-857. PubMed ID: 32363787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study.
    Bolla D; Weissleder SV; Radan AP; Gasparri ML; Raio L; Müller M; Surbek D
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):149. PubMed ID: 29747591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol for labor induction in term pregnancies: a pair-matched case-control study.
    Döbert M; Brandstetter A; Henrich W; Rawnaq T; Hasselbeck H; Döbert TF; Hinkson L; Schwaerzler P
    J Perinat Med; 2018 Apr; 46(3):309-316. PubMed ID: 28672758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus dinoprostone vaginal insert: A comparison of labour and delivery outcomes.
    Rankin K; Chodankar R; Raymond K; Bhaskar S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Apr; 235():93-96. PubMed ID: 30122321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study.
    Marsdal KE; Sørbye IK; Gaudernack LC; Lukasse M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Jan; 18(1):11. PubMed ID: 29304769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert.
    Maggi C; Mazzoni G; Gerosa V; Fratelli N; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Lojacono A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Oct; 98(10):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 31140585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Slow-release vaginal insert of misoprostol versus orally administrated solution of misoprostol for the induction of labour in primiparous term pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial.
    Wallström T; Strandberg M; Gemzell-Danielsson K; Pilo C; Jarnbert-Pettersson H; Friman-Mathiasson M; Wiberg-Itzel E
    BJOG; 2019 Aug; 126(9):1148-1155. PubMed ID: 30989788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standard and adjusted criteria for the use of the misoprostol vaginal insert for labor induction: a comparative cohort study.
    Brandstetter A; Döbert M; Schwaerzler P; Döbert TF; Hasselbeck H; Henrich W
    J Perinat Med; 2019 Sep; 47(7):750-756. PubMed ID: 31373898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy and safety of misoprostol vaginal insert vs. oral misoprostol for induction of labor.
    Redling K; Schaedelin S; Huhn EA; Hoesli I
    J Perinat Med; 2019 Feb; 47(2):176-182. PubMed ID: 30179853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical experience with misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a prospective clinical observational study.
    Schmidt M; Neophytou M; Hars O; Freudenberg J; Kühnert M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 299(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 30374645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety of misoprostol vaginal insert for labor induction using standard vs. adjusted retrieval criteria: a comparative cohort study.
    Brandstetter A; Döbert M; Schwaerzler P; Döbert TF; Hasselbeck H; Henrich W
    J Perinat Med; 2020 Jun; 48(5):488-494. PubMed ID: 32304314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The efficacy of misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol in the induction of labor of nulliparous women: A randomized national multicenter trial.
    Hokkila E; Kruit H; Rahkonen L; Timonen S; Mattila M; Laatio L; Ordén MR; Uotila J; Luukkaala T; Tihtonen K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug; 98(8):1032-1039. PubMed ID: 30771243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Pevzner L; Alfirevic Z; Powers BL; Wing DA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jun; 156(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 21353372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Misoprostol vaginal insert for successful labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Wing DA; Miller H; Parker L; Powers BL; Rayburn WF;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):533-541. PubMed ID: 21343755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fetal heart rate and cardiotocographic abnormalities with varying dose misoprostol vaginal inserts.
    Stephenson ML; Powers BL; Wing DA
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Jan; 26(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 22712609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Induction of labour with retrievable prostaglandin vaginal inserts: outcomes following retrieval due to an intrapartum adverse event.
    Rugarn O; Tipping D; Powers B; Wing DA
    BJOG; 2017 Apr; 124(5):796-803. PubMed ID: 27307397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tachysystole and risk of cesarean section after labor induction using misoprostol: A cohort study.
    Sichitiu J; Vial Y; Panchaud A; Baud D; Desseauve D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jun; 249():54-58. PubMed ID: 32361173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Induction of Labor at Term with Oral Misoprostol or as a Vaginal Insert and Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert - A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.
    Beyer J; Jäger Y; Balci D; Kolb G; Weschenfelder F; Seeger S; Schlembach D; Abou-Dakn M; Schleußner E
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 2022 Aug; 82(8):868-873. PubMed ID: 35967743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Initial clinical experience with a misoprostol vaginal insert in comparison with a dinoprostone insert for inducing labor.
    Mayer RB; Oppelt P; Shebl O; Pömer J; Allerstorfer C; Weiss C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 May; 200():89-93. PubMed ID: 26995147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.