143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32364414)
1. Conventional versus stereotactic image guided pedicle screw placement during spinal deformity correction: a retrospective propensity score-matched study of a national longitudinal database.
Rezaii PG; Pendharkar AV; Ho AL; Sussman ES; Veeravagu A; Ratliff JK; Desai AM
Int J Neurosci; 2021 Oct; 131(10):953-961. PubMed ID: 32364414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conventional Versus Stereotactic Image-guided Pedicle Screw Placement During Posterior Lumbar Fusions: A Retrospective Propensity Score-matched Study of a National Longitudinal Database.
Pendharkar AV; Rezaii PG; Ho AL; Sussman ES; Veeravagu A; Ratliff JK; Desai AM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Nov; 44(21):E1272-E1280. PubMed ID: 31634303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraoperative computed tomography image-guided navigation for posterior thoracolumbar spinal instrumentation in spinal deformity surgery.
Tormenti MJ; Kostov DB; Gardner PA; Kanter AS; Spiro RM; Okonkwo DO
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Mar; 28(3):E11. PubMed ID: 20192656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Perioperative Complications in Navigated versus Conventional Thoracolumbar Fusion in the Setting of Adult Spinal Deformity.
Ansari D; DesLaurier JT; Almadidy Z; Chaudhry NS; Mehta AI
World Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 162():e616-e625. PubMed ID: 35339712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The accuracy of navigation and 3D image-guided placement for the placement of pedicle screws in congenital spine deformity.
Larson AN; Polly DW; Guidera KJ; Mielke CH; Santos ER; Ledonio CG; Sembrano JN
J Pediatr Orthop; 2012 Sep; 32(6):e23-9. PubMed ID: 22892631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Navigated versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy and Complication Rate.
Budu A; Sims-Williams H; Radatz M; Bacon A; Bhattacharyya D; Athanassacopoulos M; Ivanov M
World Neurosurg; 2020 Dec; 144():e541-e545. PubMed ID: 32891853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retrospective Review of Revision Surgery After Image-guided Instrumented Spinal Surgery Compared With Traditional Instrumented Spinal Surgery.
Towner JE; Li YI; Singla A; Moquin R; Li YM
Clin Spine Surg; 2020 Aug; 33(7):E317-E321. PubMed ID: 32049676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The European Robotic Spinal Instrumentation (EUROSPIN) study: protocol for a multicentre prospective observational study of pedicle screw revision surgery after robot-guided, navigated and freehand thoracolumbar spinal fusion.
Staartjes VE; Molliqaj G; van Kampen PM; Eversdijk HAJ; Amelot A; Bettag C; Wolfs JFC; Urbanski S; Hedayat F; Schneekloth CG; Abu Saris M; Lefranc M; Peltier J; Boscherini D; Fiss I; Schatlo B; Rohde V; Ryang YM; Krieg SM; Meyer B; Kögl N; Girod PP; Thomé C; Twisk JWR; Tessitore E; Schröder ML
BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e030389. PubMed ID: 31501123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Learning curve of 3D fluoroscopy image-guided pedicle screw placement in the thoracolumbar spine.
Ryang YM; Villard J; Obermüller T; Friedrich B; Wolf P; Gempt J; Ringel F; Meyer B
Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3):467-76. PubMed ID: 25315133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is there a difference between navigated and non-navigated robot cohorts in robot-assisted spine surgery? A multicenter, propensity-matched analysis of 2,800 screws and 372 patients.
Lee NJ; Zuckerman SL; Buchanan IA; Boddapati V; Mathew J; Leung E; Park PJ; Pham MH; Buchholz AL; Khan A; Pollina J; Mullin JP; Jazini E; Haines C; Schuler TC; Good CR; Lombardi JM; Lehman RA
Spine J; 2021 Sep; 21(9):1504-1512. PubMed ID: 34022461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the Clinical Safety Profile of Computer-Assisted Navigation for Posterior Cervical Fusion: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of 30-Day Outcomes.
Ansari D; Chiu RG; Kumar M; Patel S; Almadidy Z; Chaudhry NS; Mehta AI
World Neurosurg; 2021 Jun; 150():e530-e538. PubMed ID: 33746104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of intraoperative computed tomography with or without navigation system in surgical correction of spinal deformity: a preliminary result of 59 consecutive human cases.
Cui G; Wang Y; Kao TH; Zhang Y; Liu Z; Liu B; Li J; Zhang X; Zhu S; Lu N; Mao K; Wang Z; Zhang X; Yuan X; Dong T; Xiao S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(10):891-900. PubMed ID: 22024897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 30-Day Complications Between Navigated and Conventional Single-level Instrumented Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.
Bovonratwet P; Nelson SJ; Ondeck NT; Geddes BJ; Grauer JN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Mar; 43(6):447-453. PubMed ID: 28700450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Initial intraoperative experience with robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement with stealth navigation in pediatric spine deformity: an evaluation of the first 40 cases.
Gonzalez D; Ghessese S; Cook D; Hedequist D
J Robot Surg; 2021 Oct; 15(5):687-693. PubMed ID: 33094435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraoperative image guidance compared with free-hand methods in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis posterior spinal surgery: a systematic review on screw-related complications and breach rates.
Chan A; Parent E; Narvacan K; San C; Lou E
Spine J; 2017 Sep; 17(9):1215-1229. PubMed ID: 28428081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.
Than KD; Mummaneni PV; Bridges KJ; Tran S; Park P; Chou D; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Vogel TD; Nunley PD; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Mundis GM
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E7. PubMed ID: 29191098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increased Radiation but No Benefits in Pedicle Screw Accuracy With Navigation versus a Freehand Technique in Scoliosis Surgery.
Urbanski W; Jurasz W; Wolanczyk M; Kulej M; Morasiewicz P; Dragan SL; Zaluski R; Miekisiak G; Dragan SF
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 May; 476(5):1020-1027. PubMed ID: 29432262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety and accuracy of freehand versus navigated C2 pars or pedicle screw placement.
Hlubek RJ; Bohl MA; Cole TS; Morgan CD; Xu DS; Chang SW; Turner JD; Kakarla UK
Spine J; 2018 Aug; 18(8):1374-1381. PubMed ID: 29253631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Economic evaluation comparing intraoperative cone beam CT-based navigation and conventional fluoroscopy for the placement of spinal pedicle screws: a patient-level data cost-effectiveness analysis.
Dea N; Fisher CG; Batke J; Strelzow J; Mendelsohn D; Paquette SJ; Kwon BK; Boyd MD; Dvorak MF; Street JT
Spine J; 2016 Jan; 16(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 26456854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement in Children 10 Years or Younger Using Navigation and Intraoperative CT.
Luo TD; Polly DW; Ledonio CG; Wetjen NM; Larson AN
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Apr; 29(3):E135-8. PubMed ID: 27007788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
