These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32364600)

  • 1. FEASIBILITY OF DISPLAYED EXPOSURE INDEX IN IEC STANDARD FRAMEWORK AS A DOSE OPTIMISATION TOOL FOR DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
    Park H; Yoon Y; Tanaka N; Kim J; Kim J; Morishita J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(3):384-394. PubMed ID: 32364600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the effects of subject thickness on the exposure index in digital radiography.
    Takaki T; Takeda K; Murakami S; Ogawa H; Ogawa M; Sakamoto M
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2016 Jan; 9(1):116-20. PubMed ID: 26613753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proper Management of the Clinical Exposure Index Based on Body Thickness Using Dose Optimization Tools in Digital Chest Radiography: A Phantom Study.
    Yoon Y; Park H; Kim J; Kim J; Roh Y; Tanaka N; Morishita J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 34068390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of X-ray beam quality on determination of exposure index.
    Yasumatsu S; Tanaka N; Iwase K; Shimizu Y; Morishita J
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2016 Jan; 9(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 26619973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Current state of practice regarding digital radiography exposure indicators and deviation indices: Report of AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 232.
    Dave JK; Jones AK; Fisher R; Hulme K; Rill L; Zamora D; Woodward A; Brady S; MacDougall RD; Goldman L; Lang S; Peck D; Apgar B; Shepard SJ; Uzenoff R; Willis C
    Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):e1146-e1160. PubMed ID: 30255505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation.
    Butler ML; Rainford L; Last J; Brennan PC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):371-4. PubMed ID: 20223849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The New Exposure Indicator for Digital Radiography.
    Seeram E
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2014 Jun; 45(2):144-158. PubMed ID: 31051946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monitoring clinical exposure index and deviation index for dose optimization based on national diagnostic reference level: Focusing on general radiography of extremities.
    Park H; Yoon Y; Kim E; Jeong H; Kim J
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(3):419-432. PubMed ID: 35124635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of calibration error for applying exposure index].
    Ariga E
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1433-7. PubMed ID: 22104235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Study of appropriate dosing in consideration of image quality and patient dose on the digital radiography].
    Kishimoto K; Ariga E; Ishigaki R; Imai M; Kawamoto K; Kobayashi K; Sawada M; Noto K; Nakamae M; Higashide R
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1381-97. PubMed ID: 22104230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of digital radiography practice using exposure index tracking.
    Scott AW; Zhou Y; Allahverdian J; Nute JL; Lee C
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):343-355. PubMed ID: 27929507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. THE CONSISTENCY OF EXPOSURE INDICATOR VALUES IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
    Jamil A; Mohd MI; Zain NM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(4):413-418. PubMed ID: 29767799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utilization of upper and lower limits of exposure index in clinical digital radiography.
    Funahashi M; Kashiyama K; Nakamura T; Shiraishi J
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2022 Dec; 15(4):349-357. PubMed ID: 36036873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography.
    Lewis S; Pieterse T; Lawrence H
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2019 Mar; 66(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 30834686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The validity and reliability of the exposure index as a metric for estimating the radiation dose to the patient.
    Erenstein HG; Browne D; Curtin S; Dwyer RS; Higgins RN; Hommel SF; Menzinga J; Pires Jorge JA; Sauty M; de Vries G; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Oct; 26 Suppl 2():S94-S99. PubMed ID: 32291123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between detector size and the need for extra images and their effect on radiation exposure in digital mammography screening.
    Entz K; Sommer A; Heindel W; Lenzen H
    Rofo; 2014 Sep; 186(9):868-75. PubMed ID: 24563411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital radiography exposure indices: A review.
    Mothiram U; Brennan PC; Lewis SJ; Moran B; Robinson J
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2014 Jun; 61(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 26229645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exposure index in digital radiography: initial results of awareness and knowledge from Nigerian digital radiography practices.
    Esien-Umo EO; Erim AE; Chiaghanam NO; Ogbu T; Ijever AW; Archibong BE; Osakwe CA; Ekpo EU
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2023 Mar; 54(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 36456458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Investigation of image quality identification utilizing physical image quality measurement in direct- and indirect-type of flat panel detectors and computed radiography].
    Yokoi T; Takata T; Ichikawa K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1415-25. PubMed ID: 22104233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.