125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32364600)
1. FEASIBILITY OF DISPLAYED EXPOSURE INDEX IN IEC STANDARD FRAMEWORK AS A DOSE OPTIMISATION TOOL FOR DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
Park H; Yoon Y; Tanaka N; Kim J; Kim J; Morishita J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(3):384-394. PubMed ID: 32364600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Proper Management of the Clinical Exposure Index Based on Body Thickness Using Dose Optimization Tools in Digital Chest Radiography: A Phantom Study.
Yoon Y; Park H; Kim J; Kim J; Roh Y; Tanaka N; Morishita J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 34068390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the effects of subject thickness on the exposure index in digital radiography.
Takaki T; Takeda K; Murakami S; Ogawa H; Ogawa M; Sakamoto M
Radiol Phys Technol; 2016 Jan; 9(1):116-20. PubMed ID: 26613753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of X-ray beam quality on determination of exposure index.
Yasumatsu S; Tanaka N; Iwase K; Shimizu Y; Morishita J
Radiol Phys Technol; 2016 Jan; 9(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 26619973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Current state of practice regarding digital radiography exposure indicators and deviation indices: Report of AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 232.
Dave JK; Jones AK; Fisher R; Hulme K; Rill L; Zamora D; Woodward A; Brady S; MacDougall RD; Goldman L; Lang S; Peck D; Apgar B; Shepard SJ; Uzenoff R; Willis C
Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):e1146-e1160. PubMed ID: 30255505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation.
Butler ML; Rainford L; Last J; Brennan PC
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):371-4. PubMed ID: 20223849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The New Exposure Indicator for Digital Radiography.
Seeram E
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2014 Jun; 45(2):144-158. PubMed ID: 31051946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monitoring clinical exposure index and deviation index for dose optimization based on national diagnostic reference level: Focusing on general radiography of extremities.
Park H; Yoon Y; Kim E; Jeong H; Kim J
J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(3):419-432. PubMed ID: 35124635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evaluation of calibration error for applying exposure index].
Ariga E
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1433-7. PubMed ID: 22104235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Study of appropriate dosing in consideration of image quality and patient dose on the digital radiography].
Kishimoto K; Ariga E; Ishigaki R; Imai M; Kawamoto K; Kobayashi K; Sawada M; Noto K; Nakamae M; Higashide R
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1381-97. PubMed ID: 22104230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of digital radiography practice using exposure index tracking.
Scott AW; Zhou Y; Allahverdian J; Nute JL; Lee C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):343-355. PubMed ID: 27929507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. THE CONSISTENCY OF EXPOSURE INDICATOR VALUES IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
Jamil A; Mohd MI; Zain NM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(4):413-418. PubMed ID: 29767799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utilization of upper and lower limits of exposure index in clinical digital radiography.
Funahashi M; Kashiyama K; Nakamura T; Shiraishi J
Radiol Phys Technol; 2022 Dec; 15(4):349-357. PubMed ID: 36036873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography.
Lewis S; Pieterse T; Lawrence H
J Med Radiat Sci; 2019 Mar; 66(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 30834686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The validity and reliability of the exposure index as a metric for estimating the radiation dose to the patient.
Erenstein HG; Browne D; Curtin S; Dwyer RS; Higgins RN; Hommel SF; Menzinga J; Pires Jorge JA; Sauty M; de Vries G; England A
Radiography (Lond); 2020 Oct; 26 Suppl 2():S94-S99. PubMed ID: 32291123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship between detector size and the need for extra images and their effect on radiation exposure in digital mammography screening.
Entz K; Sommer A; Heindel W; Lenzen H
Rofo; 2014 Sep; 186(9):868-75. PubMed ID: 24563411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital radiography exposure indices: A review.
Mothiram U; Brennan PC; Lewis SJ; Moran B; Robinson J
J Med Radiat Sci; 2014 Jun; 61(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 26229645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exposure index in digital radiography: initial results of awareness and knowledge from Nigerian digital radiography practices.
Esien-Umo EO; Erim AE; Chiaghanam NO; Ogbu T; Ijever AW; Archibong BE; Osakwe CA; Ekpo EU
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2023 Mar; 54(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 36456458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Investigation of image quality identification utilizing physical image quality measurement in direct- and indirect-type of flat panel detectors and computed radiography].
Yokoi T; Takata T; Ichikawa K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1415-25. PubMed ID: 22104233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
