123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32364600)
21. [Physical image properties of digital radiography systems in low dose range].
Kunitomo H; Ichikawa K; Higashide R; Ohashi K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(8):961-9. PubMed ID: 22975694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
International Commission on Radiological Protection
Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. New exposure indicators for digital radiography simplified for radiologists and technologists.
Don S; Whiting BR; Rutz LJ; Apgar BK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1337-41. PubMed ID: 23169727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluating the use of exposure indicators in digital x-ray imaging system: Gauteng South Africa.
Lewis S; Pieterse T; Lawrence H
Radiography (Lond); 2019 Aug; 25(3):e58-e62. PubMed ID: 31301792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The standardized exposure index for digital radiography: an opportunity for optimization of radiation dose to the pediatric population.
Seibert JA; Morin RL
Pediatr Radiol; 2011 May; 41(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 21491197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Technical characterization of five x-ray detectors for paediatric radiography applications.
Marshall NW; Smet M; Hofmans M; Pauwels H; De Clercq T; Bosmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Nov; 62(24):N573-N586. PubMed ID: 29064378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Flat panel digital radiography compared with storage phosphor computed radiography: assessment of dose versus image quality in phantom studies.
Fischbach F; Ricke J; Freund T; Werk M; Spors B; Baumann C; Pech MJ; Felix R
Invest Radiol; 2002 Nov; 37(11):609-14. PubMed ID: 12393973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. OPTIMIZING IMAGE QUALITY, RADIATION DOSAGE TO THE PATIENT AND TO THE DETECTOR IN PEDIATRIC CHEST RADIOGRAPHY: A PHANTOM STUDY OF A PORTABLE DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM.
Shahgeldi K; Sjöberg T; Nordström J; Lesanu R; Svahn TM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(4):414-420. PubMed ID: 30916753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. DigiBit: A System for Adjusting Radiographic Exposure Factors in the Digital Era.
Ching W; Robinson J; McEntee MF
Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 26199434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Influence of interest region and interest value settings on exposure index-analysis using chest clinical images].
Nakamae M; Miyajima Y; Nakano T; Kitanaka Y; Okura Y
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Nov; 70(11):1250-7. PubMed ID: 25410331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Projection X-ray Imaging: Radiography, Mammography, Fluoroscopy.
Seibert JA
Health Phys; 2019 Feb; 116(2):148-156. PubMed ID: 30585956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Feasibility of new patient dose management tool in digital radiography: Using clinical exposure index data of mobile chest radiography in a large university hospital.
Park H; Kim J; Kang EJ; Kim Y; Jo H; Heo JH; Yang W; Yoon Y
Heliyon; 2023 Oct; 9(10):e20760. PubMed ID: 37860502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Performance comparison of an active matrix flat panel imager, computed radiography system, and a screen-film system at four standard radiation qualities.
Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):343-50. PubMed ID: 15789578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Study on the effect of setting the region of interest for exposure index computing].
Hirose S; Matsuzawa H; Hirose A; Kawamoto K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2015 Jan; 71(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 25672532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Exposure creep in computed radiography: a longitudinal study.
Gibson DJ; Davidson RA
Acad Radiol; 2012 Apr; 19(4):458-62. PubMed ID: 22225727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Radiation dose in digital chest radiography: comparison among three technologies.
Saiani F; Ghirardi C; Rodella CA; Feroldi P; Chiesa A
Radiol Med; 2004 Apr; 107(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 15103291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2: optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems.
Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 9927091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
