These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32365075)

  • 41. Perception of Japanese Pitch Accent without F0.
    Sugiyama Y
    Phonetica; 2017; 74(2):107-123. PubMed ID: 28384645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Speech task effects on acoustic measure of fundamental frequency in Cantonese-speaking children.
    Ma EP; Lam NL
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 79(12):2260-4. PubMed ID: 26586246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Fundamental frequency characteristics of Jordanian Arabic speakers.
    Natour YS; Wingate JM
    J Voice; 2009 Sep; 23(5):560-6. PubMed ID: 18640820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0.
    Culling JF; Darwin CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3454-67. PubMed ID: 8326071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Multiparametric Analysis of Speaking Fundamental Frequency in Genetically Related Speakers Using Different Speech Materials: Some Forensic Implications.
    Cavalcanti JC; Eriksson A; Barbosa PA
    J Voice; 2024 Jan; 38(1):243.e11-243.e29. PubMed ID: 34629229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The role of perceived speaker identity in F0 normalization of vowels.
    Johnson K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):642-54. PubMed ID: 2212287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Contribution of temporal fine structure information and fundamental frequency separation to intelligibility in a competing-speaker paradigm.
    Jackson HM; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2421-30. PubMed ID: 23556607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Unintended imitation of fundamental frequency in female speakers.
    Kuhlmann LL; Iwarsson J
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2020 Apr; 45(1):10-14. PubMed ID: 30698072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Influence of fundamental frequency on stop-consonant voicing perception: a case of learned covariation or auditory enhancement?
    Holt LL; Lotto AJ; Kluender KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Feb; 109(2):764-74. PubMed ID: 11248980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Acoustic and perceptual study of Cantonese tones produced by profoundly hearing-impaired adolescents.
    Khouw E; Ciocca V
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):243-55. PubMed ID: 16672793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Influence of personal characteristics of the speaker on phonetic quality in perception of vowels.
    Fox RA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Oct; 53(2):515-9. PubMed ID: 7312538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Spontaneous imitation of fundamental frequency and speech rate by nonstutterers and stutterers.
    Bosshardt HG; Sappok C; Knipschild M; Hölscher C
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1997 Jul; 26(4):425-48. PubMed ID: 9232010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. "Pitch" accent in alaryngeal speech.
    van Rossum MA; de Krom G; Nooteboom SG; Quené H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1106-18. PubMed ID: 12546481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Listeners' Perceptions of Speaker Personality Traits Based on Speech.
    Welch B; van Mersbergen MR; Helou LB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Dec; 64(12):4762-4771. PubMed ID: 34731579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Neural tracking of the fundamental frequency of the voice: The effect of voice characteristics.
    Van Canneyt J; Wouters J; Francart T
    Eur J Neurosci; 2021 Jun; 53(11):3640-3653. PubMed ID: 33861480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Acoustic-phonetic characteristics of speech produced with communicative intent to counter adverse listening conditions.
    Hazan V; Baker R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2139-52. PubMed ID: 21973368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The influence of inter- and intra-speaker tempo on fundamental frequency and palatalization.
    Cooper WE; Soares C; Ham A; Damon K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 May; 73(5):1723-30. PubMed ID: 6863751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Perceptual and computational separation of simultaneous vowels: cues arising from low-frequency beating.
    Culling JF; Darwin CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1559-69. PubMed ID: 8176059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Perceptual Discrimination of Speaking Style Under Cochlear Implant Simulation.
    Tamati TN; Janse E; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 29742545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.