These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32365090)

  • 1. Simultaneous SNP selection and adjustment for population structure in high dimensional prediction models.
    Bhatnagar SR; Yang Y; Lu T; Schurr E; Loredo-Osti JC; Forest M; Oualkacha K; Greenwood CMT
    PLoS Genet; 2020 May; 16(5):e1008766. PubMed ID: 32365090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficient penalized generalized linear mixed models for variable selection and genetic risk prediction in high-dimensional data.
    St-Pierre J; Oualkacha K; Bhatnagar SR
    Bioinformatics; 2023 Feb; 39(2):. PubMed ID: 36708013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficient Implementation of Penalized Regression for Genetic Risk Prediction.
    Privé F; Aschard H; Blum MGB
    Genetics; 2019 May; 212(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 30808621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel algorithm for simultaneous SNP selection in high-dimensional genome-wide association studies.
    Zuber V; Duarte Silva AP; Strimmer K
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Oct; 13():284. PubMed ID: 23113980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. TSGSIS: a high-dimensional grouped variable selection approach for detection of whole-genome SNP-SNP interactions.
    Fang YH; Wang JH; Hsiung CA
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Nov; 33(22):3595-3602. PubMed ID: 28651334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hybrid of Restricted and Penalized Maximum Likelihood Method for Efficient Genome-Wide Association Study.
    Ren W; Liang Z; He S; Xiao J
    Genes (Basel); 2020 Oct; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 33138126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Principal component regression and linear mixed model in association analysis of structured samples: competitors or complements?
    Zhang Y; Pan W
    Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 39(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 25536929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genome-wide barebones regression scan for mixed-model association analysis.
    Gao J; Zhou X; Hao Z; Jiang L; Yang R
    Theor Appl Genet; 2020 Jan; 133(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 31552442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Further improvements to linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies.
    Widmer C; Lippert C; Weissbrod O; Fusi N; Kadie C; Davidson R; Listgarten J; Heckerman D
    Sci Rep; 2014 Nov; 4():6874. PubMed ID: 25387525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On polygenic risk scores for complex traits prediction.
    Zhao B; Zou F
    Biometrics; 2022 Jun; 78(2):499-511. PubMed ID: 33786811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Single Marker Family-Based Association Analysis Not Conditional on Parental Information.
    Namkung J; Won S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():409-439. PubMed ID: 28980257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of a blockwise approach in variable selection using linkage disequilibrium information.
    Dehman A; Ambroise C; Neuvial P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 May; 16():148. PubMed ID: 25951947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiplex confounding factor correction for genomic association mapping with squared sparse linear mixed model.
    Wang H; Liu X; Xiao Y; Xu M; Xing EP
    Methods; 2018 Aug; 145():33-40. PubMed ID: 29705210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A SUPER powerful method for genome wide association study.
    Wang Q; Tian F; Pan Y; Buckler ES; Zhang Z
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e107684. PubMed ID: 25247812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An alternative covariance estimator to investigate genetic heterogeneity in populations.
    Heslot N; Jannink JL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():93. PubMed ID: 26612537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variable prediction accuracy of polygenic scores within an ancestry group.
    Mostafavi H; Harpak A; Agarwal I; Conley D; Pritchard JK; Przeworski M
    Elife; 2020 Jan; 9():. PubMed ID: 31999256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Software engineering the mixed model for genome-wide association studies on large samples.
    Zhang Z; Buckler ES; Casstevens TM; Bradbury PJ
    Brief Bioinform; 2009 Nov; 10(6):664-75. PubMed ID: 19933212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. pLARmEB: integration of least angle regression with empirical Bayes for multilocus genome-wide association studies.
    Zhang J; Feng JY; Ni YL; Wen YJ; Niu Y; Tamba CL; Yue C; Song Q; Zhang YM
    Heredity (Edinb); 2017 Jun; 118(6):517-524. PubMed ID: 28295030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genome-wide hierarchical mixed model association analysis.
    Hao Z; Gao J; Song Y; Yang R; Liu D
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 34368830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SNP selection in genome-wide and candidate gene studies via penalized logistic regression.
    Ayers KL; Cordell HJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Dec; 34(8):879-91. PubMed ID: 21104890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.