126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32366302)
1. A focus on cross-purpose tools, automated recognition of study design in multiple disciplines, and evaluation of automation tools: a summary of significant discussions at the fourth meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR).
O'Connor AM; Glasziou P; Taylor M; Thomas J; Spijker R; Wolfe MS
Syst Rev; 2020 May; 9(1):100. PubMed ID: 32366302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Still moving toward automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the third meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR).
O'Connor AM; Tsafnat G; Gilbert SB; Thayer KA; Shemilt I; Thomas J; Glasziou P; Wolfe MS
Syst Rev; 2019 Feb; 8(1):57. PubMed ID: 30786933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Moving toward the automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the second meeting of International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR).
O'Connor AM; Tsafnat G; Gilbert SB; Thayer KA; Wolfe MS
Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 7(1):3. PubMed ID: 29316980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR).
Beller E; Clark J; Tsafnat G; Adams C; Diehl H; Lund H; Ouzzani M; Thayer K; Thomas J; Turner T; Xia J; Robinson K; Glasziou P;
Syst Rev; 2018 May; 7(1):77. PubMed ID: 29778096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Usage of automation tools in systematic reviews.
van Altena AJ; Spijker R; Olabarriaga SD
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 30561081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A question of trust: can we build an evidence base to gain trust in systematic review automation technologies?
O'Connor AM; Tsafnat G; Thomas J; Glasziou P; Gilbert SB; Hutton B
Syst Rev; 2019 Jun; 8(1):143. PubMed ID: 31215463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic review automation tools improve efficiency but lack of knowledge impedes their adoption: a survey.
Scott AM; Forbes C; Clark J; Carter M; Glasziou P; Munn Z
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():80-94. PubMed ID: 34242757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Data extraction methods for systematic review (semi)automation: A living review protocol.
Schmidt L; Olorisade BK; McGuinness LA; Thomas J; Higgins JPT
F1000Res; 2020; 9():210. PubMed ID: 32724560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic reviewers used various approaches to data extraction and expressed several research needs: a survey.
Büchter RB; Rombey T; Mathes T; Khalil H; Lunny C; Pollock D; Puljak L; Tricco AC; Pieper D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jul; 159():214-224. PubMed ID: 37286149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The views of health guideline developers on the use of automation in health evidence synthesis.
Arno A; Elliott J; Wallace B; Turner T; Thomas J
Syst Rev; 2021 Jan; 10(1):16. PubMed ID: 33419479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review.
Khalil H; Ameen D; Zarnegar A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Apr; 144():22-42. PubMed ID: 34896236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic online living evidence summaries: emerging tools to accelerate evidence synthesis.
Hair K; Wilson E; Wong C; Tsang A; Macleod M; Bannach-Brown A
Clin Sci (Lond); 2023 May; 137(10):773-784. PubMed ID: 37219941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evidence synthesis 2.0: how artificial intelligence is making systematic reviews more efficient.].
Petri D
Recenti Prog Med; 2023 Jun; 114(6):359-361. PubMed ID: 37229683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.
Ouzzani M; Hammady H; Fedorowicz Z; Elmagarmid A
Syst Rev; 2016 Dec; 5(1):210. PubMed ID: 27919275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The semi-automation of title and abstract screening: a retrospective exploration of ways to leverage Abstrackr's relevance predictions in systematic and rapid reviews.
Gates A; Gates M; Sebastianski M; Guitard S; Elliott SA; Hartling L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):139. PubMed ID: 32493228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis.
Marshall IJ; Wallace BC
Syst Rev; 2019 Jul; 8(1):163. PubMed ID: 31296265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Towards greater understanding of implementation during systematic reviews of complex healthcare interventions: the framework for implementation transferability applicability reporting (FITAR).
Baxter S; Johnson M; Chambers D; Sutton A; Goyder E; Booth A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):80. PubMed ID: 30999848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Choice of data extraction tools for systematic reviews depends on resources and review complexity.
Elamin MB; Flynn DN; Bassler D; Briel M; Alonso-Coello P; Karanicolas PJ; Guyatt GH; Malaga G; Furukawa TA; Kunz R; Schünemann H; Murad MH; Barbui C; Cipriani A; Montori VM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 May; 62(5):506-10. PubMed ID: 19348977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening Automation in Systematic Reviews: Analysis of Tools and Their Machine Learning Capabilities.
Sandner E; Gütl C; Jakovljevic I; Wagner A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2024 Apr; 313():179-185. PubMed ID: 38682527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Semi-automated Tools for Systematic Searches.
Adam GP; Wallace BC; Trikalinos TA
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2345():17-40. PubMed ID: 34550582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
