These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32366941)

  • 1. The impact of 2018 ASCO-CAP HER2 testing guidelines on breast cancer HER2 results. An audit of 2132 consecutive cases evaluated by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization.
    Farshid G; Dhatrak D; Gilhotra A; Koszyca B; Nolan J
    Mod Pathol; 2020 Sep; 33(9):1783-1790. PubMed ID: 32366941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New ASCO/CAP guideline recommendations for HER2 testing increase the proportion of reflex in situ hybridization tests and of HER2 positive breast cancers.
    Tchrakian N; Flanagan L; Harford J; Gannon JM; Quinn CM
    Virchows Arch; 2016 Feb; 468(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 26521061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of breast cancer HER-2 receptor testing with immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization.
    Shanmugalingam A; Hitos K; Pathmanathan N; Edirimmane S; Hughes TM; Ngui NK
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Feb; 198(1):143-148. PubMed ID: 36604351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 interpretation in breast cancer: comparison with previous guidelines and clinical significance of the proposed in situ hybridization groups.
    Woo JW; Lee K; Chung YR; Jang MH; Ahn S; Park SY
    Hum Pathol; 2020 Apr; 98():10-21. PubMed ID: 32027910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Well-differentiated invasive breast cancers with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry: what is the yield of routine reflex in-situ hybridization testing?
    Bethune GC; Pettit AS; Veldhuijzen van Zanten D; Barnes PJ
    Histopathology; 2017 May; 70(6):966-974. PubMed ID: 28032917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically equivocal results.
    Wang B; Ding W; Sun K; Wang X; Xu L; Teng X
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16726. PubMed ID: 31723206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of Modified 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines on HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer. One Year Experience.
    Varga Z; Noske A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140652. PubMed ID: 26473483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of the updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) gene testing in invasive breast cancers: A single center study.
    Lim TH; Lim AST; Tien SL; Tan PH
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2022 Jun; 58():151935. PubMed ID: 35313158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of the updated 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 FISH testing in invasive breast cancer: a retrospective study of HER2 fish results of 2233 cases.
    Liu ZH; Wang K; Lin DY; Xu J; Chen J; Long XY; Ge Y; Luo XL; Zhang KP; Liu YH; Xu FP
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 May; 175(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 30712197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What to expect from the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 guideline in the reflex in situ hybridization test of immunohistochemically equivocal 2+ cases?
    Curado M; Caramelo AS; Eloy C; Polónia A
    Virchows Arch; 2019 Sep; 475(3):303-311. PubMed ID: 30953146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gene status in HER2 equivocal breast carcinomas: impact of distinct recommendations and contribution of a polymerase chain reaction-based method.
    Sapino A; Maletta F; Verdun di Cantogno L; Macrì L; Botta C; Gugliotta P; Scalzo MS; Annaratone L; Balmativola D; Pietribiasi F; Bernardi P; Arisio R; Viberti L; Guzzetti S; Orlassino R; Ercolani C; Mottolese M; Viale G; Marchiò C
    Oncologist; 2014 Nov; 19(11):1118-26. PubMed ID: 25323485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reflex Repeat HER2 Testing of Grade 3 Breast Carcinoma at Excision Using Immunohistochemistry and In Situ Analysis: Frequency of HER2 Discordance and Utility of Core Needle Biopsy Parameters to Refine Case Selection.
    Prendeville S; Feeley L; Bennett MW; O'Connell F; Browne TJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2016 Jan; 145(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 26712873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. HER2 Testing for Breast Cancer in the Genomics Laboratory: A Sea Change for Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization.
    Geiersbach KB; Sill DR; Meyer RG; Yuhas JA; Sukov WR; Mounajjed T; Carter JM; Jenkins RB; Chen B
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2021 Jul; 145(7):883-886. PubMed ID: 33112955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. HER2 FISH classification of equivocal HER2 IHC breast cancers with use of the 2013 ASCO/CAP practice guideline.
    Fan YS; Casas CE; Peng J; Watkins M; Fan L; Chapman J; Ikpatt OF; Gomez C; Zhao W; Reis IM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Feb; 155(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 26895325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Updated 2013 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) testing increase HER2 positive and HER2 equivocal breast cancer cases; retrospective study of HER2 FISH results of 836 invasive breast cancers.
    Singh K; Tantravahi U; Lomme MM; Pasquariello T; Steinhoff M; Sung CJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jun; 157(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 27180259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Equivocal (HER2 IHC 2+) breast carcinomas: gene-protein assay testing reveals association between genetic heterogeneity, individual cell amplification status and potential treatment benefits.
    Pekar G; Kasselaki I; Pekar-Lukacs A; Dekany C; Hellberg D; Tot T
    Histopathology; 2019 Jan; 74(2):300-310. PubMed ID: 30113715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of ERBB2/HER2 Status in HER2-Equivocal Breast Cancers by FISH and 2013/2014 ASCO-CAP Guidelines.
    Press MF; Seoane JA; Curtis C; Quinaux E; Guzman R; Sauter G; Eiermann W; Mackey JR; Robert N; Pienkowski T; Crown J; Martin M; Valero V; Bee V; Ma Y; Villalobos I; Slamon DJ
    JAMA Oncol; 2019 Mar; 5(3):366-375. PubMed ID: 30520947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline and the SISH technique for HER2 testing of breast cancer selects more patients for anti-HER2 treatment.
    Polónia A; Leitão D; Schmitt F
    Virchows Arch; 2016 Apr; 468(4):417-23. PubMed ID: 26754674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of HER2 Immunohistochemistry-Negative, FISH-Amplified Breast Cancers and Their Response to Anti-HER2 Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
    Gibbons-Fideler IS; Nitta H; Murillo A; Tozbikian G; Banks P; Parwani AV; Li Z
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2019 Jan; 151(2):176-184. PubMed ID: 30339245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rate of reclassification of HER2-equivocal breast cancer cases to HER2-negative per the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines and response of HER2-equivocal cases to anti-HER2 therapy.
    Crespo J; Sun H; Wu J; Ding QQ; Tang G; Robinson MK; Chen H; Sahin AA; Lim B
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0241775. PubMed ID: 33180796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.