176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32366941)
1. The impact of 2018 ASCO-CAP HER2 testing guidelines on breast cancer HER2 results. An audit of 2132 consecutive cases evaluated by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization.
Farshid G; Dhatrak D; Gilhotra A; Koszyca B; Nolan J
Mod Pathol; 2020 Sep; 33(9):1783-1790. PubMed ID: 32366941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New ASCO/CAP guideline recommendations for HER2 testing increase the proportion of reflex in situ hybridization tests and of HER2 positive breast cancers.
Tchrakian N; Flanagan L; Harford J; Gannon JM; Quinn CM
Virchows Arch; 2016 Feb; 468(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 26521061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of breast cancer HER-2 receptor testing with immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization.
Shanmugalingam A; Hitos K; Pathmanathan N; Edirimmane S; Hughes TM; Ngui NK
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Feb; 198(1):143-148. PubMed ID: 36604351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 interpretation in breast cancer: comparison with previous guidelines and clinical significance of the proposed in situ hybridization groups.
Woo JW; Lee K; Chung YR; Jang MH; Ahn S; Park SY
Hum Pathol; 2020 Apr; 98():10-21. PubMed ID: 32027910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Well-differentiated invasive breast cancers with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry: what is the yield of routine reflex in-situ hybridization testing?
Bethune GC; Pettit AS; Veldhuijzen van Zanten D; Barnes PJ
Histopathology; 2017 May; 70(6):966-974. PubMed ID: 28032917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically equivocal results.
Wang B; Ding W; Sun K; Wang X; Xu L; Teng X
Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16726. PubMed ID: 31723206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of Modified 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines on HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer. One Year Experience.
Varga Z; Noske A
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140652. PubMed ID: 26473483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of the updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) gene testing in invasive breast cancers: A single center study.
Lim TH; Lim AST; Tien SL; Tan PH
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2022 Jun; 58():151935. PubMed ID: 35313158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of the updated 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 FISH testing in invasive breast cancer: a retrospective study of HER2 fish results of 2233 cases.
Liu ZH; Wang K; Lin DY; Xu J; Chen J; Long XY; Ge Y; Luo XL; Zhang KP; Liu YH; Xu FP
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 May; 175(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 30712197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What to expect from the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 guideline in the reflex in situ hybridization test of immunohistochemically equivocal 2+ cases?
Curado M; Caramelo AS; Eloy C; Polónia A
Virchows Arch; 2019 Sep; 475(3):303-311. PubMed ID: 30953146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gene status in HER2 equivocal breast carcinomas: impact of distinct recommendations and contribution of a polymerase chain reaction-based method.
Sapino A; Maletta F; Verdun di Cantogno L; Macrì L; Botta C; Gugliotta P; Scalzo MS; Annaratone L; Balmativola D; Pietribiasi F; Bernardi P; Arisio R; Viberti L; Guzzetti S; Orlassino R; Ercolani C; Mottolese M; Viale G; Marchiò C
Oncologist; 2014 Nov; 19(11):1118-26. PubMed ID: 25323485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reflex Repeat HER2 Testing of Grade 3 Breast Carcinoma at Excision Using Immunohistochemistry and In Situ Analysis: Frequency of HER2 Discordance and Utility of Core Needle Biopsy Parameters to Refine Case Selection.
Prendeville S; Feeley L; Bennett MW; O'Connell F; Browne TJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2016 Jan; 145(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 26712873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. HER2 Testing for Breast Cancer in the Genomics Laboratory: A Sea Change for Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization.
Geiersbach KB; Sill DR; Meyer RG; Yuhas JA; Sukov WR; Mounajjed T; Carter JM; Jenkins RB; Chen B
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2021 Jul; 145(7):883-886. PubMed ID: 33112955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. HER2 FISH classification of equivocal HER2 IHC breast cancers with use of the 2013 ASCO/CAP practice guideline.
Fan YS; Casas CE; Peng J; Watkins M; Fan L; Chapman J; Ikpatt OF; Gomez C; Zhao W; Reis IM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Feb; 155(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 26895325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Updated 2013 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) testing increase HER2 positive and HER2 equivocal breast cancer cases; retrospective study of HER2 FISH results of 836 invasive breast cancers.
Singh K; Tantravahi U; Lomme MM; Pasquariello T; Steinhoff M; Sung CJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jun; 157(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 27180259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Equivocal (HER2 IHC 2+) breast carcinomas: gene-protein assay testing reveals association between genetic heterogeneity, individual cell amplification status and potential treatment benefits.
Pekar G; Kasselaki I; Pekar-Lukacs A; Dekany C; Hellberg D; Tot T
Histopathology; 2019 Jan; 74(2):300-310. PubMed ID: 30113715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of ERBB2/HER2 Status in HER2-Equivocal Breast Cancers by FISH and 2013/2014 ASCO-CAP Guidelines.
Press MF; Seoane JA; Curtis C; Quinaux E; Guzman R; Sauter G; Eiermann W; Mackey JR; Robert N; Pienkowski T; Crown J; Martin M; Valero V; Bee V; Ma Y; Villalobos I; Slamon DJ
JAMA Oncol; 2019 Mar; 5(3):366-375. PubMed ID: 30520947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline and the SISH technique for HER2 testing of breast cancer selects more patients for anti-HER2 treatment.
Polónia A; Leitão D; Schmitt F
Virchows Arch; 2016 Apr; 468(4):417-23. PubMed ID: 26754674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identification of HER2 Immunohistochemistry-Negative, FISH-Amplified Breast Cancers and Their Response to Anti-HER2 Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
Gibbons-Fideler IS; Nitta H; Murillo A; Tozbikian G; Banks P; Parwani AV; Li Z
Am J Clin Pathol; 2019 Jan; 151(2):176-184. PubMed ID: 30339245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 reporting guidelines in breast cancer: An assessment study from Indian oncology centre that primarily performs HER2 IHC testing with special emphasis on IHC equivocal category.
Pasricha S; Gupta G; Garg R; Sharma A; Gandhi JS; Durga G; Kamboj M; Grover S; Mehta A
Breast J; 2018 Jul; 24(4):468-472. PubMed ID: 29251392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
