311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32367439)
1. Robotic-assisted right colectomy versus laparoscopic approach: case-matched study and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Ferri V; Quijano Y; Nuñez J; Caruso R; Duran H; Diaz E; Fabra I; Malave L; Isernia R; d'Ovidio A; Agresott R; Gomez P; Isojo R; Vicente E
J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):115-123. PubMed ID: 32367439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Minimally Invasive Colectomy.
Simianu VV; Gaertner WB; Kuntz K; Kwaan MR; Lowry AC; Madoff RD; Jensen CC
Ann Surg; 2020 Aug; 272(2):334-341. PubMed ID: 32675547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colectomy: cost and clinical outcomes.
Davis BR; Yoo AC; Moore M; Gunnarsson C
JSLS; 2014; 18(2):211-24. PubMed ID: 24960484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy.
Park JS; Choi GS; Park SY; Kim HJ; Ryuk JP
Br J Surg; 2012 Sep; 99(9):1219-26. PubMed ID: 22864881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic or three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy for right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME) and intracorporeal anastomosis? A propensity score-matching study comparison.
Ceccarelli G; Costa G; Ferraro V; De Rosa M; Rondelli F; Bugiantella W
Surg Endosc; 2021 May; 35(5):2039-2048. PubMed ID: 32372219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Totally robotic vs 3D laparoscopic colectomy: A single centers preliminary experience.
Guerrieri M; Campagnacci R; Sperti P; Belfiori G; Gesuita R; Ghiselli R
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Dec; 21(46):13152-9. PubMed ID: 26674518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term oncologic after robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a prospective randomized study.
Park JS; Kang H; Park SY; Kim HJ; Woo IT; Park IK; Choi GS
Surg Endosc; 2019 Sep; 33(9):2975-2981. PubMed ID: 30456502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The da Vinci Xi system for robotic total/subtotal colectomy vs. conventional laparoscopy: short-term outcomes.
Ozben V; de Muijnck C; Karabork M; Ozoran E; Zenger S; Bilgin IA; Aytac E; Baca B; Balik E; Hamzaoglu I; Karahasanoglu T; Bugra D
Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Sep; 23(9):861-868. PubMed ID: 31456106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcomes and cost-benefit analysis comparing laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries.
Vasudevan V; Reusche R; Wallace H; Kaza S
Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5490-5493. PubMed ID: 27126626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. From Laparoscopic Right Colectomy with Extracorporeal Anastomosis to Robot-Assisted Intracorporeal Anastomosis to Totally Robotic Right Colectomy for Cancer: The Evolution of Robotic Multiquadrant Abdominal Surgery.
Scotton G; Contardo T; Zerbinati A; Tosato SM; Orsini C; Morpurgo E
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Oct; 28(10):1216-1222. PubMed ID: 30117748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic
Alharthi S; Reilly M; Arishi A; Ahmed AM; Chulkov M; Qu W; Ortiz J; Nazzal M; Pannell S
Am Surg; 2020 Mar; 86(3):256-260. PubMed ID: 32223807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is robotic right colectomy economically sustainable? a multicentre retrospective comparative study and cost analysis.
Merola G; Sciuto A; Pirozzi F; Andreuccetti J; Pignata G; Corcione F; Milone M; De Palma GD; Castaldo R; Pecchia L; Ceccarelli G; Bracale U
Surg Endosc; 2020 Sep; 34(9):4041-4047. PubMed ID: 31617088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experience With Transitioning From Laparoscopic to Robotic Right Colectomy.
Gerbaud F; Valverde A; Danoussou D; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Lupinacci RM
JSLS; 2019; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 31787837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Real-world cost-effectiveness of laparoscopy versus open colectomy for colon cancer: a nationwide population-based study.
Liao CH; Tan EC; Chen CC; Yang MC
Surg Endosc; 2017 Apr; 31(4):1796-1805. PubMed ID: 27538935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis for robotic-assisted and laparoscopic right colectomy: short-term outcomes of a multi-center prospective trial.
Cleary RK; Silviera M; Reidy TJ; McCormick J; Johnson CS; Sylla P; Cannon J; Lujan H; Kassir A; Landmann R; Gaertner W; Lee E; Bastawrous A; Bardakcioglu O; Pandey S; Attaluri V; Bernstein M; Obias V; Franklin ME; Pigazzi A
Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):4349-4358. PubMed ID: 34724580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis is feasible with no operative conversions during the learning curve for an experienced laparoscopic surgeon developing a robotics program.
Blumberg D
J Robot Surg; 2019 Aug; 13(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 30474786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study).
Vlug MS; Wind J; Hollmann MW; Ubbink DT; Cense HA; Engel AF; Gerhards MF; van Wagensveld BA; van der Zaag ES; van Geloven AA; Sprangers MA; Cuesta MA; Bemelman WA;
Ann Surg; 2011 Dec; 254(6):868-75. PubMed ID: 21597360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative analysis of outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic elective (procto-) colectomies for benign and malignant disease.
Huerta S; Meier J; Emuakhagbon VS; Favela J; Argo M; Polanco PM; Augustine MM; Pham T
J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 32297148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of outcome and cost between the open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgical treatments for colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis using nationwide hospital record database.
Chiu CC; Hsu WT; Choi JJ; Galm B; Lee MG; Chang CN; Liu CC; Lee CC
Surg Endosc; 2019 Nov; 33(11):3757-3765. PubMed ID: 30675661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The "Micro Hand S" Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: Short-Term Outcomes at a Single Center.
Zeng Y; Wang G; Liu Y; Li Z; Yi B; Zhu S
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Apr; 30(4):363-368. PubMed ID: 32013727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
