These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32369604)
21. Use of connectivity mapping to support read across: A deeper dive using data from 186 chemicals, 19 cell lines and 2 case studies. De Abrew KN; Shan YK; Wang X; Krailler JM; Kainkaryam RM; Lester CC; Settivari RS; LeBaron MJ; Naciff JM; Daston GP Toxicology; 2019 Jul; 423():84-94. PubMed ID: 31125584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Workshop on the validation and regulatory acceptance of innovative 3R approaches in regulatory toxicology - Evolution versus revolution. Burgdorf T; Piersma AH; Landsiedel R; Clewell R; Kleinstreuer N; Oelgeschläger M; Desprez B; Kienhuis A; Bos P; de Vries R; de Wit L; Seidle T; Scheel J; Schönfelder G; van Benthem J; Vinggaard AM; Eskes C; Ezendam J Toxicol In Vitro; 2019 Sep; 59():1-11. PubMed ID: 30946968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. REACH and reproductive and developmental toxicology: still questions. Scialli AR; Guikema AJ Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2012 Feb; 58(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 22239083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Use of category approaches, read-across and (Q)SAR: general considerations. Patlewicz G; Ball N; Booth ED; Hulzebos E; Zvinavashe E; Hennes C Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Oct; 67(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 23764304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The role of the European Chemicals Bureau in promoting the regulatory use of (Q)SAR methods. Worth AP; Bassan A; De Bruijn J; Gallegos Saliner A; Netzeva T; Patlewicz G; Pavan M; Tsakovska I; Eisenreich S SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2007; 18(1-2):111-25. PubMed ID: 17365963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Read-across and new approach methodologies applied in a 10-step framework for cosmetics safety assessment - A case study with parabens. Ouedraogo G; Alexander-White C; Bury D; Clewell HJ; Cronin M; Cull T; Dent M; Desprez B; Detroyer A; Ellison C; Giammanco S; Hack E; Hewitt NJ; Kenna G; Klaric M; Kreiling R; Lester C; Mahony C; Mombelli E; Naciff J; O'Brien J; Schepky A; Tozer S; van der Burg B; van Vugt-Lussenburg B; Stuard S; Cosmetics Europe Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2022 Jul; 132():105161. PubMed ID: 35508214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Application of omics data in regulatory toxicology: report of an international BfR expert workshop. Marx-Stoelting P; Braeuning A; Buhrke T; Lampen A; Niemann L; Oelgeschlaeger M; Rieke S; Schmidt F; Heise T; Pfeil R; Solecki R Arch Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 89(11):2177-84. PubMed ID: 26486796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Using a hybrid read-across method to evaluate chemical toxicity based on chemical structure and biological data. Guo Y; Zhao L; Zhang X; Zhu H Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Aug; 178():178-187. PubMed ID: 31004930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A critical evaluation of the 2011 ECHA reports on compliance with the REACH and CLP regulations and on the use of alternatives to testing on animals for compliance with the REACH regulation. Spielmann H; Sauer UG; Mekenyan O Altern Lab Anim; 2011 Oct; 39(5):481-93. PubMed ID: 22103941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The challenge of using read-across within the EU REACH regulatory framework; how much uncertainty is too much? Dipropylene glycol methyl ether acetate, an exemplary case study. Ball N; Bartels M; Budinsky R; Klapacz J; Hays S; Kirman C; Patlewicz G Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Mar; 68(2):212-21. PubMed ID: 24378700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Integrated testing and intelligent assessment-new challenges under REACH. Ahlers J; Stock F; Werschkun B Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Oct; 15(7):565-72. PubMed ID: 18818964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A strategy for structuring and reporting a read-across prediction of toxicity. Schultz TW; Amcoff P; Berggren E; Gautier F; Klaric M; Knight DJ; Mahony C; Schwarz M; White A; Cronin MT Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Aug; 72(3):586-601. PubMed ID: 26003513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Machine Learning of Toxicological Big Data Enables Read-Across Structure Activity Relationships (RASAR) Outperforming Animal Test Reproducibility. Luechtefeld T; Marsh D; Rowlands C; Hartung T Toxicol Sci; 2018 Sep; 165(1):198-212. PubMed ID: 30007363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Toxicological comments to the discussion about REACH. Greim H; Arand M; Autrup H; Bolt HM; Bridges J; Dybing E; Glomot R; Foa V; Schulte-Hermann R Arch Toxicol; 2006 Mar; 80(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 16411136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Evidence-based toxicological evaluation of chemicals by group summaries]. Greim H Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2008 Dec; 51(12):1417-25. PubMed ID: 19137217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of the ToxRTool's ability to rate the reliability of toxicological data for human health hazard assessments. Segal D; Makris SL; Kraft AD; Bale AS; Fox J; Gilbert M; Bergfelt DR; Raffaele KC; Blain RB; Fedak KM; Selgrade MK; Crofton KM Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Jun; 72(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 25777839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. E-SovTox: An online database of the main publicly-available sources of toxicity data concerning REACH-relevant chemicals published in the Russian language. Sihtmäe M; Blinova I; Aruoja V; Dubourguier HC; Legrand N; Kahru A Altern Lab Anim; 2010 Aug; 38(4):297-301. PubMed ID: 20822322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The role of professional judgment in chemical hazard assessment and communication. Hamilton JD; Daggett DA; Pittinger CA Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Oct; 46(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 16843576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]