These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32369607)
1. Inferences about which of J dependent groups has the largest robust measure of location. Wilcox RR Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2021 Feb; 74(1):90-98. PubMed ID: 32369607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The fallback procedure for evaluating a single family of hypotheses. Wiens BL; Dmitrienko A J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):929-42. PubMed ID: 16279352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Online control of the familywise error rate. Tian J; Ramdas A Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Apr; 30(4):976-993. PubMed ID: 33413033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A less conservative method to adjust for familywise error rate in neuropsychological research: the Holm's sequential Bonferroni procedure. Eichstaedt KE; Kovatch K; Maroof DA NeuroRehabilitation; 2013; 32(3):693-6. PubMed ID: 23648625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of methods for estimating the number of true null hypotheses in multiplicity testing. Hsueh HM; Chen JJ; Kodell RL J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):675-89. PubMed ID: 14584715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sample size determination with familywise control of both type I and type II errors in clinical trials. Wang B; Ting N J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(5):951-65. PubMed ID: 26881972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strategies in adjusting for multiple comparisons: A primer for pediatric surgeons. Staffa SJ; Zurakowski D J Pediatr Surg; 2020 Sep; 55(9):1699-1705. PubMed ID: 32029234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A HETEROSCEDASTIC METHOD FOR COMPARING REGRESSION LINES AT SPECIFIED DESIGN POINTS WHEN USING A ROBUST REGRESSION ESTIMATOR. Wilcox RR J Data Sci; 2013 Apr; 11(2):281-291. PubMed ID: 23950761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Asymptotics of Bonferroni for Dependent Normal Test Statistics. Proschan MA; Shaw PA Stat Probab Lett; 2011 Jul; 81(7):739-748. PubMed ID: 24882910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A note on familywise error rate for a primary and secondary endpoint. Proschan MA; Follmann DA Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):1114-1118. PubMed ID: 35355244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Power and Type I Error Control for Univariate Comparisons in Multivariate Two-Group Designs. Frane AV Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(2):233-47. PubMed ID: 26609880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistical conclusion validity. Multiple inferences in rehabilitation research. Ottenbacher KJ Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1991 Dec; 70(6):317-22. PubMed ID: 1742003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Many tests of significance: new methods for controlling type I errors. Keselman HJ; Miller CW; Holland B Psychol Methods; 2011 Dec; 16(4):420-31. PubMed ID: 22040371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Normative comparisons for large neuropsychological test batteries: User-friendly and sensitive solutions to minimize familywise false positives. Huizenga HM; Agelink van Rentergem JA; Grasman RP; Muslimovic D; Schmand B J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2016 Aug; 38(6):611-29. PubMed ID: 27167864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Controlling the rate of Type I error over a large set of statistical tests. Keselman HJ; Cribbie R; Holland B Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2002 May; 55(Pt 1):27-39. PubMed ID: 12034010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]