These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32370148)

  • 21. How do defaults and framing influence food choice? An intervention aimed at promoting plant-based choice in online menus.
    Erhard A; Boztuğ Y; Lemken D
    Appetite; 2023 Nov; 190():107005. PubMed ID: 37598798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Application of Intelligent Recommendation Techniques for Consumers' Food Choices in Restaurants.
    Li X; Jia W; Yang Z; Li Y; Yuan D; Zhang H; Sun M
    Front Psychiatry; 2018; 9():415. PubMed ID: 30233432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Under consumers' scrutiny - an investigation into consumers' attitudes and concerns about nudging in the realm of health behavior.
    Junghans AF; Cheung TT; De Ridder DD
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Apr; 15():336. PubMed ID: 25881161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How does consumer knowledge affect environmentally sustainable choices? Evidence from a cross-country latent class analysis of food labels.
    Peschel AO; Grebitus C; Steiner B; Veeman M
    Appetite; 2016 Nov; 106():78-91. PubMed ID: 26944229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Motives for dish choices during home meal preparation: results from a large sample of the NutriNet-Santé study.
    Ducrot P; Méjean C; Allès B; Fassier P; Hercberg S; Péneau S
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Sep; 12():120. PubMed ID: 26419533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Use of food labels by adolescents to make healthier choices on snacks: a cross-sectional study from Sri Lanka.
    Talagala IA; Arambepola C
    BMC Public Health; 2016 Aug; 16():739. PubMed ID: 27502411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. When in Doubt, Follow the Crowd? Responsiveness to Social Proof Nudges in the Absence of Clear Preferences.
    Venema TAG; Kroese FM; Benjamins JS; de Ridder DTD
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1385. PubMed ID: 32655456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of a Nudging Cue Targeting Food Choice in a University Cafeteria: A Field Study.
    Kawa C; Ianiro-Dahm PM; Nijhuis JFH; Gijselaers WH
    Healthcare (Basel); 2023 May; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 37174849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Choice architecture promotes sustainable choices in online food-delivery apps.
    Lohmann PM; Gsottbauer E; Farrington J; Human S; Reisch LA
    PNAS Nexus; 2024 Oct; 3(10):pgae422. PubMed ID: 39372540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Examining the Efficacy of a 'Feasible' Nudge Intervention to Increase the Purchase of Vegetables by First Year University Students (17-19 Years of Age) in British Columbia: A Pilot Study.
    Mistura M; Fetterly N; Rhodes RE; Tomlin D; Naylor PJ
    Nutrients; 2019 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 31382395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Providing choice and/or variety during a meal: Impact on vegetable liking and intake.
    Parizel O; Labouré H; Marsset-Baglieri A; Fromentin G; Sulmont-Rossé C
    Appetite; 2017 Jan; 108():391-398. PubMed ID: 27784633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Food choices among students using the school food service in New Zealand.
    Utter J; Schaaf D; Ni Mhurchu C; Scragg R
    N Z Med J; 2007 Jan; 120(1248):U2389. PubMed ID: 17277808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Presenting quality data to vulnerable groups: charts, summaries or behavioral economic nudges?
    Elbel B; Gillespie C; Raven MC
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2014 Jul; 19(3):161-168. PubMed ID: 24567307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Effects of Nudges: One-Shot Only? Exploring the Temporal Spillover Effects of a Default Nudge.
    Van Rookhuijzen M; De Vet E; Adriaanse MA
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():683262. PubMed ID: 34589018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of a robotic companion on women's food choices: Evidence from an imaginary task.
    Guo X; Wang C; Wan X
    Appl Psychol Health Well Being; 2024 Nov; 16(4):2266-2282. PubMed ID: 39177023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Decoy effects in intertemporal and probabilistic choices the role of time pressure, immediacy, and certainty.
    Marini M; Paglieri F
    Behav Processes; 2019 May; 162():130-141. PubMed ID: 30849515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Traffic light labelling of meals to promote sustainable consumption and healthy eating.
    Osman M; Thornton K
    Appetite; 2019 Jul; 138():60-71. PubMed ID: 30880087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Beyond Discrete Choices - Investigating the Effectiveness of a Proximity Nudge With Multiple Alternative Options.
    van Gestel LC; Adriaanse MA; de Ridder DTD
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1211. PubMed ID: 32595564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Swedish Consumers' Perception of Food Quality and Sustainability in Relation to Organic Food Production.
    Bosona T; Gebresenbet G
    Foods; 2018 Apr; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 29614785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does better for the environment mean less tasty? Offering more climate-friendly meals is good for the environment and customer satisfaction.
    Visschers VH; Siegrist M
    Appetite; 2015 Dec; 95():475-83. PubMed ID: 26278875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.