These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32370651)

  • 21. Operator adaptation to changes in system reliability under adaptable automation.
    Chavaillaz A; Sauer J
    Ergonomics; 2017 Sep; 60(9):1261-1272. PubMed ID: 27875937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Detecting automation failures in a simulated supervisory control environment.
    Foroughi CK; Sibley C; Brown NL; Rovira E; Pak R; Coyne JT
    Ergonomics; 2019 Sep; 62(9):1150-1161. PubMed ID: 31179874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Trust in Automation: Implications for Understanding Autonomy in Future Systems.
    Schaefer KE; Chen JY; Szalma JL; Hancock PA
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):377-400. PubMed ID: 27005902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Effect of Asset Degradation on Trust in Swarms: A Reexamination of System-Wide Trust in Human-Swarm Interaction.
    Capiola A; Hamdan IA; Lyons JB; Lewis M; Alarcon GM; Sycara K
    Hum Factors; 2024 May; 66(5):1475-1489. PubMed ID: 36511147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Are well-calibrated users effective users? Associations between calibration of trust and performance on an automation-aided task.
    Merritt SM; Lee D; Unnerstall JL; Huber K
    Hum Factors; 2015 Feb; 57(1):34-47. PubMed ID: 25790569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The use of adaptable automation: Effects of extended skill lay-off and changes in system reliability.
    Sauer J; Chavaillaz A
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():471-481. PubMed ID: 27633244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Not all trust is created equal: dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interactions.
    Merritt SM; Ilgen DR
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):194-210. PubMed ID: 18516832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving.
    Körber M; Baseler E; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jan; 66():18-31. PubMed ID: 28958427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Inferring Trust From Users' Behaviours; Agents' Predictability Positively Affects Trust, Task Performance and Cognitive Load in Human-Agent Real-Time Collaboration.
    Daronnat S; Azzopardi L; Halvey M; Dubiel M
    Front Robot AI; 2021; 8():642201. PubMed ID: 34307467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Adaptive trust calibration for human-AI collaboration.
    Okamura K; Yamada S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229132. PubMed ID: 32084201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factors affecting trust in high-vulnerability human-robot interaction contexts: A structural equation modelling approach.
    Kim W; Kim N; Lyons JB; Nam CS
    Appl Ergon; 2020 May; 85():103056. PubMed ID: 32174344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Supporting trust calibration and the effective use of decision aids by presenting dynamic system confidence information.
    McGuirl JM; Sarter NB
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(4):656-65. PubMed ID: 17240714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of imperfect automation on decision making in a simulated command and control task.
    Rovira E; McGarry K; Parasuraman R
    Hum Factors; 2007 Feb; 49(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 17315845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Examining single- and multiple-process theories of trust in automation.
    Rice S
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Jul; 136(3):303-19. PubMed ID: 19650524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Relationship Between Trust and Use Choice in Human-Robot Interaction.
    Sanders T; Kaplan A; Koch R; Schwartz M; Hancock PA
    Hum Factors; 2019 Jun; 61(4):614-626. PubMed ID: 30601683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Human-automation interaction for multiple robot control: the effect of varying automation assistance and individual differences on operator performance.
    Wright JL; Chen JYC; Barnes MJ
    Ergonomics; 2018 Aug; 61(8):1033-1045. PubMed ID: 29451105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of Touch, Voice, and Multimodal Input, and Task Load on Multiple-UAV Monitoring Performance During Simulated Manned-Unmanned Teaming in a Military Helicopter.
    Levulis SJ; DeLucia PR; Kim SY
    Hum Factors; 2018 Dec; 60(8):1117-1129. PubMed ID: 30063411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dancing With Algorithms: Interaction Creates Greater Preference and Trust in Machine-Learned Behavior.
    Gutzwiller RS; Reeder J
    Hum Factors; 2021 Aug; 63(5):854-867. PubMed ID: 32048883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Effect of Informing Participants of the Response Bias of an Automated Target Recognition System on Trust and Reliance Behavior.
    Knocton S; Hunter A; Connors W; Dithurbide L; Neyedli HF
    Hum Factors; 2023 Mar; 65(2):189-199. PubMed ID: 34078167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. From Here to Autonomy.
    Endsley MR
    Hum Factors; 2017 Feb; 59(1):5-27. PubMed ID: 28146676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.