These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32371081)
1. Effects of Different Orientations of Cage Implantation on Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Liang Y; Zhao Y; Xu S; Zhu Z; Liu H; Mao K World Neurosurg; 2020 Aug; 140():e97-e104. PubMed ID: 32371081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters. Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages: Increased Risk of Late Postoperative Subsidence Without a Real Improvement of Perioperative Outcomes: A Clinical Monocentric Study. Armocida D; Pesce A; Cimatti M; Proietti L; Santoro A; Frati A World Neurosurg; 2021 Dec; 156():e57-e63. PubMed ID: 34492389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of the correlative factors in the selection of interbody fusion cage height in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Wang H; Chen W; Jiang J; Lu F; Ma X; Xia X BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jan; 17():9. PubMed ID: 26754610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing the medium-term outcomes of lumbar interbody fusion via transforaminal and oblique approach in treating lumbar degenerative disc diseases. Zhao L; Xie T; Wang X; Yang Z; Pu X; Lu Y; Song Y; Zeng J Spine J; 2022 Jun; 22(6):993-1001. PubMed ID: 34906739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease. Divi SN; Schroeder GD; Goyal DKC; Radcliff KE; Galetta MS; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Kurd MF; Rihn JA; Kaye ID; Woods BR; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK Spine J; 2019 Dec; 19(12):1960-1968. PubMed ID: 31356987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Posterior corrective surgery with a multilevel transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and a rod rotation maneuver for patients with degenerative lumbar kyphoscoliosis. Matsumura A; Namikawa T; Kato M; Ozaki T; Hori Y; Hidaka N; Nakamura H J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):150-157. PubMed ID: 27716016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Mini-open Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Oblique Self-anchored Stand-alone Cages for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study With 2-year Follow-up. Kuang L; Wang B; Lü G Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Nov; 42(21):E1259-E1265. PubMed ID: 28277385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbody fusion. Marchi L; Abdala N; Oliveira L; Amaral R; Coutinho E; Pimenta L J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jul; 19(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 23662890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do intraoperative radiographs predict final lumbar sagittal alignment following single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion? Salem KMI; Eranki AP; Paquette S; Boyd M; Street J; Kwon BK; Fisher CG; Dvorak MF J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 May; 28(5):486-491. PubMed ID: 29451437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion. Ahlquist S; Park HY; Gatto J; Shamie AN; Park DY Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 29631061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Facet Joint Fixation and Anterior, Direct Lateral, and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Disc Diseases: Retrospective Cohort Study of a New Minimally Invasive Technique. Belykh E; Kalinin AA; Martirosyan NL; Kerimbayev T; Theodore N; Preul MC; Byvaltsev VA World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e959-e968. PubMed ID: 29588241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Short-term effectiveness of nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 intervertebral cage for lumbar interbody fusion in patients with lower lumbar degenerative diseases]. Yang X; Song Y; Kong Q; Gong Q; Pei F; Tu C Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Dec; 26(12):1425-9. PubMed ID: 23316629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unilateral versus Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation Combined with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Low Lumbar Degenerative Disc Diseases: Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Results. Chen DJ; Yao C; Song Q; Tang B; Liu X; Zhang B; Dai M; Nie T; Wan Z World Neurosurg; 2018 Jul; 115():e516-e522. PubMed ID: 29702308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing the early efficacies of autologous bone grafting and interbody fusion cages for treating degenerative lumbar instability in patients of different ages. Zhong HZ; Tian DS; Zhou Y; Jing JH; Qian J; Chen L; Zhu B Int Orthop; 2016 Jun; 40(6):1211-8. PubMed ID: 26830783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bilateral implantation of low-profile interbody fusion cages: subsidence, lordosis, and fusion analysis. Schiffman M; Brau SA; Henderson R; Gimmestad G Spine J; 2003; 3(5):377-87. PubMed ID: 14588950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Morphological changes of contralateral intervertebral foramen induced by cage insertion orientation after unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Zhu K; Yan S; Guo S; Tong J; Li C; Tan J; Wan W J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Mar; 14(1):79. PubMed ID: 30866988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of sagittal contour and posterior disc height following interbody fusion: threaded cylindrical cages versus structural allograft versus vertical cages. Groth AT; Kuklo TR; Klemme WR; Polly DW; Schroeder TM J Spinal Disord Tech; 2005 Aug; 18(4):332-6. PubMed ID: 16021014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]