173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32371451)
1. Inferring Parameters of the Distribution of Fitness Effects of New Mutations When Beneficial Mutations Are Strongly Advantageous and Rare.
Booker TR
G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Jul; 10(7):2317-2326. PubMed ID: 32371451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inference of Distribution of Fitness Effects and Proportion of Adaptive Substitutions from Polymorphism Data.
Tataru P; Mollion M; Glémin S; Bataillon T
Genetics; 2017 Nov; 207(3):1103-1119. PubMed ID: 28951530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Full Distribution of Fitness Effects of New Amino Acid Mutations Across Great Apes.
Castellano D; Macià MC; Tataru P; Bataillon T; Munch K
Genetics; 2019 Nov; 213(3):953-966. PubMed ID: 31488516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inferring the distributions of fitness effects and proportions of strongly deleterious mutations.
Charmouh AP; Bocedi G; Hartfield M
G3 (Bethesda); 2023 Aug; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 37337692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. polyDFE: Inferring the Distribution of Fitness Effects and Properties of Beneficial Mutations from Polymorphism Data.
Tataru P; Bataillon T
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2090():125-146. PubMed ID: 31975166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The evolutionarily stable distribution of fitness effects.
Rice DP; Good BH; Desai MM
Genetics; 2015 May; 200(1):321-9. PubMed ID: 25762525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of new mutations on fitness: insights from models and data.
Bataillon T; Bailey SF
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2014 Jul; 1320(1):76-92. PubMed ID: 24891070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Joint inference of the distribution of fitness effects of deleterious mutations and population demography based on nucleotide polymorphism frequencies.
Keightley PD; Eyre-Walker A
Genetics; 2007 Dec; 177(4):2251-61. PubMed ID: 18073430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A method for inferring the rate of occurrence and fitness effects of advantageous mutations.
Schneider A; Charlesworth B; Eyre-Walker A; Keightley PD
Genetics; 2011 Dec; 189(4):1427-37. PubMed ID: 21954160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Causes of natural variation in fitness: evidence from studies of Drosophila populations.
Charlesworth B
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Feb; 112(6):1662-9. PubMed ID: 25572964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating the rate of adaptive molecular evolution when the evolutionary divergence between species is small.
Keightley PD; Eyre-Walker A
J Mol Evol; 2012 Feb; 74(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 22327123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The dynamics of adaptation on correlated fitness landscapes.
Kryazhimskiy S; Tkacik G; Plotkin JB
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Nov; 106(44):18638-43. PubMed ID: 19858497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The fates of mutant lineages and the distribution of fitness effects of beneficial mutations in laboratory budding yeast populations.
Frenkel EM; Good BH; Desai MM
Genetics; 2014 Apr; 196(4):1217-26. PubMed ID: 24514901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inferring Genome-Wide Correlations of Mutation Fitness Effects between Populations.
Huang X; Fortier AL; Coffman AJ; Struck TJ; Irby MN; James JE; León-Burguete JE; Ragsdale AP; Gutenkunst RN
Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Sep; 38(10):4588-4602. PubMed ID: 34043790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in the presence of slightly deleterious mutations and population size change.
Eyre-Walker A; Keightley PD
Mol Biol Evol; 2009 Sep; 26(9):2097-108. PubMed ID: 19535738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inferring the Frequency Spectrum of Derived Variants to Quantify Adaptive Molecular Evolution in Protein-Coding Genes of Drosophila melanogaster.
Keightley PD; Campos JL; Booker TR; Charlesworth B
Genetics; 2016 Jun; 203(2):975-84. PubMed ID: 27098912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inference of the Distribution of Selection Coefficients for New Nonsynonymous Mutations Using Large Samples.
Kim BY; Huber CD; Lohmueller KE
Genetics; 2017 May; 206(1):345-361. PubMed ID: 28249985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inferring the distribution of fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.
Böndel KB; Kraemer SA; Samuels T; McClean D; Lachapelle J; Ness RW; Colegrave N; Keightley PD
PLoS Biol; 2019 Jun; 17(6):e3000192. PubMed ID: 31242179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hunting for Beneficial Mutations: Conditioning on SIFT Scores When Estimating the Distribution of Fitness Effect of New Mutations.
Chen J; Bataillon T; Glémin S; Lascoux M
Genome Biol Evol; 2022 Jan; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 34180988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A null model for the distribution of fitness effects of mutations.
Cotto O; Day T
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Jun; 120(23):e2218200120. PubMed ID: 37252948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
