150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32371608)
1. Cost-effective minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: emphasizing surgical efficiency.
Misal M; Delara R; Wasson MN
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 32(4):243-247. PubMed ID: 32371608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost analysis of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer performed by a single surgeon in an Italian center: an update in gynecologic oncological field.
Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Fachechi G; Pirovano C; Gaetani M; Youssef A
Updates Surg; 2017 Dec; 69(4):517-522. PubMed ID: 28508348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost variance across obesity class for women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy by high-volume gynecologic surgeons.
Klebanoff JS; Tyan P; Nishikawa M; North A; Amdur R; Sparks A; Kazma JM; Moawad GN
J Robot Surg; 2020 Dec; 14(6):903-907. PubMed ID: 32253574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost analysis of minimally invasive hysterectomy vs open approach performed by a single surgeon in an Italian center.
Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Fachechi G; Corso S; Pirovano C; Trio C; Villa M; Turoli D; Youssef A
J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):115-121. PubMed ID: 27460843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Change in cost after 5 years of experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer.
Avondstondt AM; Wallenstein M; D'Adamo CR; Ehsanipoor RM
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):93-96. PubMed ID: 28439744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for hysterectomy and pelvic organ prolapse repair.
Paraiso MF
Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 25274486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of Robotic Platforms on Surgical Approach and Costs in the Management of Morbidly Obese Patients with Newly Diagnosed Uterine Cancer.
Leitao MM; Narain WR; Boccamazzo D; Sioulas V; Cassella D; Ducie JA; Eriksson AG; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Brown CL; Levine DA; Jewell EL; Zivanovic O; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR; Gardner GJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jul; 23(7):2192-8. PubMed ID: 26744108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia.
Herling SF; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T; Sørensen J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Mar; 95(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 26575851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Review of strategies and factors to maximize cost-effectiveness of robotic hysterectomies and myomectomies in benign gynecological disease.
Wu CZ; Klebanoff JS; Tyan P; Moawad GN
J Robot Surg; 2019 Oct; 13(5):635-642. PubMed ID: 30919259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost analysis when open surgeons perform minimally invasive hysterectomy.
Shepherd JP; Kantartzis KL; Ahn KH; Bonidie MJ; Lee T
JSLS; 2014; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 25489215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Strategies and factors to maximize cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery in benign gynecological disease.
De Nagy J; Youssef Y; Moawad G
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Aug; 90():102380. PubMed ID: 37481892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost assessment of robotics in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review.
Iavazzo C; Papadopoulou EK; Gkegkes ID
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Nov; 40(11):2125-34. PubMed ID: 25255827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus standard laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Winter ML; Leu SY; Lagrew DC; Bustillo G
J Robot Surg; 2015 Dec; 9(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 26530837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Comparison of Complications and Costs.
Ngan TYT; Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Tulandi T; Abenhaim HA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Apr; 40(4):432-439. PubMed ID: 29032064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of postoperative partial bladder filling after minimally invasive hysterectomy on postanesthesia care unit discharge and cost: a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.
Moawad G; Tyan P; Marfori C; Abi Khalil E; Park D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 220(4):367.e1-367.e7. PubMed ID: 30639089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Strategies for Cost Optimization in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.
Youssef Y; Afaneh H; Borahay MA
JSLS; 2022; 26(3):. PubMed ID: 36071991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
