These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32372226)
21. A radiographical study on the changes in height of grafting materials after sinus lift: a comparison between two types of xenogenic materials. Hieu PD; Chung JH; Yim SB; Hong KS J Periodontal Implant Sci; 2010 Feb; 40(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 20498756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of the performances of low-crystalline carbonate apatite and Bio-Oss in sinus augmentation using three-dimensional image analysis. Nagata K; Fuchigami K; Kitami R; Okuhama Y; Wakamori K; Sumitomo H; Kim H; Okubo M; Kawana H Int J Implant Dent; 2021 Mar; 7(1):24. PubMed ID: 33754242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Volumetric changes of the graft after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss and autogenous bone in different ratios: a radiographic study in minipigs. Jensen T; Schou S; Svendsen PA; Forman JL; Gundersen HJ; Terheyden H; Holmstrup P Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Aug; 23(8):902-10. PubMed ID: 22044477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Microvessel density in sinus augmentation procedures using anorganic bovine bone and autologous bone: 3 months results. Degidi M; Artese L; Rubini C; Perrotti V; Iezzi G; Piattelli A Implant Dent; 2007 Sep; 16(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 17846548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Maxillary sinus augmentation with deproteinized bovine bone (Bio-Oss) and Impladent dental implant system. Part II. Evaluation of deprotienized bovine bone (Bio-Oss) and implant surface. Kasabah S; Simůnek A; Krug J; Lecaro MC Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove); 2002; 45(4):167-71. PubMed ID: 12587785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Grafting after sinus lift with anorganic bovine bone alone compared with 50:50 anorganic bovine bone and autologous bone: results of a pilot randomised trial at one year. Meloni SM; Jovanovic SA; Lolli FM; Cassisa C; De Riu G; Pisano M; Lumbau A; Lugliè PF; Tullio A Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 53(5):436-41. PubMed ID: 25796408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Attributes of Bio-Oss Smith MM; Duncan WJ; Coates DE J Periodontal Res; 2018 Feb; 53(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 28868669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of residual bone height and sinus width on the outcome of maxillary sinus bone augmentation using anorganic bovine bone. Pignaton TB; Wenzel A; Ferreira CEA; Borges Martinelli C; Oliveira GJPL; Marcantonio E; Spin-Neto R Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Apr; 30(4):315-323. PubMed ID: 30803035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Ten-year follow-up in a maxillary sinus augmentation using anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss). A case report with histomorphometric evaluation. Sartori S; Silvestri M; Forni F; Icaro Cornaglia A; Tesei P; Cattaneo V Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Jun; 14(3):369-72. PubMed ID: 12755788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparative study of the effect of Bio-Oss Wang F; Li Q; Wang Z J Oral Pathol Med; 2017 Aug; 46(7):528-536. PubMed ID: 27682609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A prospective controlled trial comparing xenograft/autogenous bone and collagen-stabilized xenograft for maxillary sinus augmentation-Complications, patient-reported outcomes and volumetric analysis. Alayan J; Ivanovski S Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Feb; 29(2):248-262. PubMed ID: 29231263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Clinical and radiographic outcomes of delayed implant placements after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with different grafting materials]. Zhang X; Sun F; Zhang F; Zhang ZY Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 47(10):584-7. PubMed ID: 23302379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Sinus floor elevation using a bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) with or without the concomitant use of a bilayered collagen barrier (Bio-Gide): a clinical report of immediate and delayed implant placement. Tawil G; Mawla M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):713-21. PubMed ID: 11669254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Autogenous demineralized dentin matrix from extracted tooth for the augmentation of alveolar bone defect: a prospective randomized clinical trial in comparison with anorganic bovine bone. Pang KM; Um IW; Kim YK; Woo JM; Kim SM; Lee JH Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):809-815. PubMed ID: 27279547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Histomorphometric analysis of sinus augmentation using bovine bone mineral with two different resorbable membranes. Choi SY; Jang YJ; Choi JY; Jeong JH; Kwon TG Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():68-74. PubMed ID: 22092436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Bone quality at the implant site after reconstruction of a local defect of the maxillary anterior ridge with chin bone or deproteinised cancellous bovine bone. Meijndert L; Raghoebar GM; Schüpbach P; Meijer HJ; Vissink A Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 34(8):877-84. PubMed ID: 15978776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Maxillary sinus augmentation using xenogenic bone substitute material Bio-Oss in combination with venous blood. A histologic and histomorphometric study in humans. Yildirim M; Spiekermann H; Biesterfeld S; Edelhoff D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Jun; 11(3):217-29. PubMed ID: 11168213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative histomorphometric analysis of maxillary sinus augmentation with and without bone grafting in rabbit. Sohn DS; Kim WS; An KM; Song KJ; Lee JM; Mun YS Implant Dent; 2010 Jun; 19(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 20523182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]