These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32372995)
1. Regularized Exploratory Bifactor Analysis With Small Sample Sizes. Jung S; Seo DG; Park J Front Psychol; 2020; 11():507. PubMed ID: 32372995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes: a comparison of three approaches. Jung S Behav Processes; 2013 Jul; 97():90-5. PubMed ID: 23541772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exploratory factor analysis for small samples. Jung S; Lee S Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):701-9. PubMed ID: 21431996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Comparison of Regularized Maximum-Likelihood, Regularized 2-Stage Least Squares, and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation with Misspecified Models, Small Samples, and Weak Factor Structure. Finch WH; Miller JE Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(4):608-626. PubMed ID: 32324059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Monte Carlo study comparing PIV, ULS and DWLS in the estimation of dichotomous confirmatory factor analysis. Nestler S Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):127-43. PubMed ID: 22524532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables. Li CH Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):369-87. PubMed ID: 27571021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploratory factor analysis in behavior genetics research: factor recovery with small sample sizes. Preacher KJ; MacCallum RC Behav Genet; 2002 Mar; 32(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 12036113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What are the consequences of ignoring cross-loadings in bifactor models? A simulation study assessing parameter recovery and sensitivity of goodness-of-fit indices. Ximénez C; Revuelta J; Castañeda R Front Psychol; 2022; 13():923877. PubMed ID: 36092049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Structural equation modeling with small sample sizes using two-stage ridge least-squares estimation. Jung S Behav Res Methods; 2013 Mar; 45(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 22528958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recovery of weak factor loadings in confirmatory factor analysis under conditions of model misspecification. Ximénez C Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1038-52. PubMed ID: 19897812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability and omega hierarchical in multidimensional data: A comparison of various estimators. Cho E Psychol Methods; 2022 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 36048053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recovering bifactor models: A comparison of seven methods. Giordano C; Waller NG Psychol Methods; 2020 Apr; 25(2):143-156. PubMed ID: 31343194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploratory Factor Analysis With Small Samples and Missing Data. McNeish D J Pers Assess; 2017; 99(6):637-652. PubMed ID: 27929657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The performance of robust test statistics with categorical data. Savalei V; Rhemtulla M Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 22568535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploratory Factor Analysis With Small Sample Sizes. de Winter JC; Dodou D; Wieringa PA Multivariate Behav Res; 2009; 44(2):147-81. PubMed ID: 26754265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantifying the Strength of General Factors in Psychopathology: A Comparison of CFA with Maximum Likelihood Estimation, BSEM, and ESEM/EFA Bifactor Approaches. Murray AL; Booth T; Eisner M; Obsuth I; Ribeaud D J Pers Assess; 2019; 101(6):631-643. PubMed ID: 29787294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bifactor Modeling and the Estimation of Model-Based Reliability in the WAIS-IV. Gignac GE; Watkins MW Multivariate Behav Res; 2013 Sep; 48(5):639-62. PubMed ID: 26741057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How to determine the number of factors to retain in exploratory factor analysis: A comparison of extraction methods under realistic conditions. Auerswald M; Moshagen M Psychol Methods; 2019 Aug; 24(4):468-491. PubMed ID: 30667242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consistent Partial Least Squares Path Modeling via Regularization. Jung S; Park J Front Psychol; 2018; 9():174. PubMed ID: 29515491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sample Size Requirements for Simple and Complex Mediation Models. Sim M; Kim SY; Suh Y Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Feb; 82(1):76-106. PubMed ID: 34992307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]