These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32375024)

  • 1. Computational Modeling of Protein Stability: Quantitative Analysis Reveals Solutions to Pervasive Problems.
    Broom A; Trainor K; Jacobi Z; Meiering EM
    Structure; 2020 Jun; 28(6):717-726.e3. PubMed ID: 32375024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computational tools help improve protein stability but with a solubility tradeoff.
    Broom A; Jacobi Z; Trainor K; Meiering EM
    J Biol Chem; 2017 Sep; 292(35):14349-14361. PubMed ID: 28710274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the performance of computational predictors for estimating protein stability changes upon missense mutations.
    Iqbal S; Li F; Akutsu T; Ascher DB; Webb GI; Song J
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 34058752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robust Prediction of Single and Multiple Point Protein Mutations Stability Changes.
    Álvarez-Machancoses Ó; De Andrés-Galiana EJ; Fernández-Martínez JL; Kloczkowski A
    Biomolecules; 2019 Dec; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 31906171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structure Based Thermostability Prediction Models for Protein Single Point Mutations with Machine Learning Tools.
    Jia L; Yarlagadda R; Reed CC
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138022. PubMed ID: 26361227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing computational methods for predicting protein stability upon mutation: good on average but not in the details.
    Potapov V; Cohen M; Schreiber G
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2009 Sep; 22(9):553-60. PubMed ID: 19561092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining structural modeling with ensemble machine learning to accurately predict protein fold stability and binding affinity effects upon mutation.
    Berliner N; Teyra J; Colak R; Garcia Lopez S; Kim PM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e107353. PubMed ID: 25243403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computational modeling of protein mutant stability: analysis and optimization of statistical potentials and structural features reveal insights into prediction model development.
    Parthiban V; Gromiha MM; Abhinandan M; Schomburg D
    BMC Struct Biol; 2007 Aug; 7():54. PubMed ID: 17705837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A systematic exploration of [Formula: see text] cutoff ranges in machine learning models for protein mutation stability prediction.
    Olney R; Tuor A; Jagodzinski F; Hutchinson B
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Oct; 16(5):1840022. PubMed ID: 30419784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantification of biases in predictions of protein stability changes upon mutations.
    Pucci F; Bernaerts KV; Kwasigroch JM; Rooman M
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Nov; 34(21):3659-3665. PubMed ID: 29718106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards sequence-based prediction of mutation-induced stability changes in unseen non-homologous proteins.
    Folkman L; Stantic B; Sattar A
    BMC Genomics; 2014; 15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4. PubMed ID: 24564514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reviewing Challenges of Predicting Protein Melting Temperature Change Upon Mutation Through the Full Analysis of a Highly Detailed Dataset with High-Resolution Structures.
    Louis BBV; Abriata LA
    Mol Biotechnol; 2021 Oct; 63(10):863-884. PubMed ID: 34101125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. iSEE: Interface structure, evolution, and energy-based machine learning predictor of binding affinity changes upon mutations.
    Geng C; Vangone A; Folkers GE; Xue LC; Bonvin AMJJ
    Proteins; 2019 Feb; 87(2):110-119. PubMed ID: 30417935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Machine learning algorithms for predicting protein folding rates and stability of mutant proteins: comparison with statistical methods.
    Gromiha MM; Huang LT
    Curr Protein Pept Sci; 2011 Sep; 12(6):490-502. PubMed ID: 21787301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting the Effect of Amino Acid Single-Point Mutations on Protein Stability-Large-Scale Validation of MD-Based Relative Free Energy Calculations.
    Steinbrecher T; Zhu C; Wang L; Abel R; Negron C; Pearlman D; Feyfant E; Duan J; Sherman W
    J Mol Biol; 2017 Apr; 429(7):948-963. PubMed ID: 27964946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computational Protein Design Through Grafting and Stabilization.
    Zhu C; Mowrey DD; Dokholyan NV
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():227-241. PubMed ID: 27914054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protein contact prediction by integrating deep multiple sequence alignments, coevolution and machine learning.
    Adhikari B; Hou J; Cheng J
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):84-96. PubMed ID: 29047157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring Protein Supersecondary Structure Through Changes in Protein Folding, Stability, and Flexibility.
    Pires DEV; Rodrigues CHM; Albanaz ATS; Karmakar M; Myung Y; Xavier J; Michanetzi EM; Portelli S; Ascher DB
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1958():173-185. PubMed ID: 30945219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fast and accurate predictions of protein stability changes upon mutations using statistical potentials and neural networks: PoPMuSiC-2.0.
    Dehouck Y; Grosfils A; Folch B; Gilis D; Bogaerts P; Rooman M
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Oct; 25(19):2537-43. PubMed ID: 19654118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accurate prediction of stability changes in protein mutants by combining machine learning with structure based computational mutagenesis.
    Masso M; Vaisman II
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Sep; 24(18):2002-9. PubMed ID: 18632749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.