These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32377320)

  • 1. Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements used with implant-supported prosthesis: An
    Degirmenci K; Saridag S
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2020 Apr; 12(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 32377320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
    Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Oxygen Plasma Treatment and Sandblasting of Titanium Implant-Abutment Surface on Bond Strength and Surface Topography.
    El-Helbawy NG; El-Hatery AA; Ahmed MH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):555-62. PubMed ID: 27183064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of the dentin cleansing techniques on dentin wetting and on the bond strength of a resin luting agent.
    Sarac D; Sarac YS; Kulunk S; Kulunk T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 16198174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bonding to densely sintered alumina surfaces: effect of sandblasting and silica coating on shear bond strength of luting cements.
    Blixt M; Adamczak E; Lindén LA; Odén A; Arvidson K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 11203636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shear bond strength of different types of luting cements to an aluminum oxide-reinforced glass ceramic core material.
    Begazo CC; de Boer HD; Kleverlaan CJ; van Waas MA; Feilzer AJ
    Dent Mater; 2004 Dec; 20(10):901-7. PubMed ID: 15501317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of thermal cycling and air abrasion on cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Michalakis K; Pissiotis AL; Kang K; Hirayama H; Garefis PD; Petridis H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):569-74. PubMed ID: 17929517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the Effect of Fluoride-containing Luting Cements on Titanium and Its Effect on the Shear Bond Strength.
    Avinash KVN; Reddy V; Shetty J; Nitin HC
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2019; 10(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 32015641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
    Garg P; Pujari M; Prithviraj DR; Khare S
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements to titanium.
    Abi-Rached Fde O; Fonseca RG; Haneda IG; de Almeida-Júnior AA; Adabo GL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Dec; 108(6):370-6. PubMed ID: 23217469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of previous provisional cementation on the bond strength between two definitive resin-based luting and dentin bonding agents and human dentin.
    Erkut S; Küçükesmen HC; Eminkahyagil N; Imirzalioglu P; Karabulut E
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 17288334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bond strength and interactions of machined titanium-based alloy with dental cements.
    Wadhwani C; Chung KH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Nov; 114(5):660-5. PubMed ID: 26187102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of Luting Agents on Retention of Dental Implant-Supported Prostheses.
    Pan YH; Lin TM; Liu PR; Ramp LC
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Oct; 41(5):596-9. PubMed ID: 24666355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials.
    Piwowarczyk A; Lauer HC; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 15343162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of temporary cements on the bond strength of ceramic luted to dentin.
    Abo-Hamar SE; Federlin M; Hiller KA; Friedl KH; Schmalz G
    Dent Mater; 2005 Sep; 21(9):794-803. PubMed ID: 16005507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Shahtoosi M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():20-4. PubMed ID: 22092303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
    Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part I.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL; Bogacki MT; Tietge JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):737-41. PubMed ID: 1432793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of tooth preparation cleansing protocols on the bond strength of self-adhesive resin luting cement to contaminated dentin.
    Chaiyabutr Y; Kois JC
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 18833862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.