203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32377323)
1. Fitting accuracy of ceramic veneered Co-Cr crowns produced by different manufacturing processes.
Freifrau von Maltzahn N; Bernhard F; Kohorst P
J Adv Prosthodont; 2020 Apr; 12(2):100-106. PubMed ID: 32377323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Comparison of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Cobalt- Chromium Copings Fabricated by Two Different CAD/CAM Systems (CAD/ Milling, CAD/ Ceramill Sintron).
Vojdani M; Torabi K; Atashkar B; Heidari H; Torabi Ardakani M
J Dent (Shiraz); 2016 Dec; 17(4):301-308. PubMed ID: 27942545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of Presintered Co-Cr and Zirconia Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prosthesis Compared to Cast Co-Cr.
Daou EE; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2020 Dec; 29(9):792-799. PubMed ID: 32334442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A microcomputed tomography evaluation of the marginal fit of cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated by new manufacturing techniques and alloy systems.
Kim EH; Lee DH; Kwon SM; Kwon TY
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 27677219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated by using a casting and two selective laser melting processes before and after ceramic firing.
Hong MH; Min BK; Lee DH; Kwon TY
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):475-481. PubMed ID: 30982615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks.
Akçin ET; Güncü MB; Aktaş G; Aslan Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):715-720. PubMed ID: 30017153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of CAD-CAM milling versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang J; Li H
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 35788274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns.
Lövgren N; Roxner R; Klemendz S; Larsson C
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 28024818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of ceramic layering on the fit of cobalt-chromium alloy 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by additive, soft milling, and casting technologies.
Daou EE
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):130.e1-130.e7. PubMed ID: 34034899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of marginal/internal fit of chrome-cobalt crowns: Direct laser metal sintering versus computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing.
Gunsoy S; Ulusoy M
Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(5):636-44. PubMed ID: 27538553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the internal fit and marginal integrity of interim crowns made by different manufacturing methods.
Peng CC; Chung KH; Yau HT; Ramos V
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Mar; 123(3):514-522. PubMed ID: 31353116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the Accuracy of Fit of Metal, Zirconia, and Lithium Disilicate Crowns Made from Different Manufacturing Techniques.
Al Hamad KQ; Al Quran FA; AlJalam SA; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jun; 28(5):497-503. PubMed ID: 30719780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology.
Huang Z; Zhang L; Zhu J; Zhang X
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 25794918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy of dental bridges manufactured with conventional casting technique and CAD/CAM system with Ceramill Sintron blocks using CMM.
Izadi A; Vafaee F; Shishehian A; Roshanaei G; Fathi Afkari B
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2018; 12(4):264-271. PubMed ID: 30774792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of repeated firings on marginal, axial, axio-occlusal, and occlusal fit of metal-ceramic restorations fabricated with different techniques.
Önöral Ö; Ulusoy M; Seker E; Etikan İ
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):415-420. PubMed ID: 29627208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison.
Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 26948080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the fit of metal copings fabricated using stereolithography.
Kim SB; Kim NH; Kim JH; Moon HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):693-698. PubMed ID: 29807735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Internal fit of single crowns produced by CAD-CAM and lost-wax metal casting technique assessed by the triple-scan protocol.
Dahl BE; Rønold HJ; Dahl JE
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):400-404. PubMed ID: 27692584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of repeated firing on the marginal accuracy of Co-Cr copings fabricated by selective laser melting.
Zeng L; Zhang Y; Liu Z; Wei B
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Feb; 113(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 25444279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The marginal and internal discrepancy of zirconia coping milled by two computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing systems.
Urapepon S
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2021; 21(2):192-197. PubMed ID: 33938870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
