These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3237777)

  • 21. Analysis of Polish Vowels of Tracheoesophageal Speakers.
    Mięsikowska M
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):263.e5-263.e11. PubMed ID: 27160042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An acoustic study of the tongue root contrast in Degema vowels.
    Fulop SA; Kari E; Ladefoged P
    Phonetica; 1998; 55(1-2):80-98. PubMed ID: 9693345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The interactions of amplitude and phonetic quality in esophageal speech.
    Blood GW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Jun; 24(2):308-12. PubMed ID: 7265948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. On the relationship between vowel height and fundamental frequency: evidence from esophageal speech.
    Gandour J; Weinberg B
    Phonetica; 1981; 37(5-6):344-54. PubMed ID: 7280035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Vowel identification: orthographic, perceptual, and acoustic aspects.
    Assmann PF; Nearey TM; Hogan JT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Apr; 71(4):975-89. PubMed ID: 7085986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Durations of American English vowels by native and non-native speakers: acoustic analyses and perceptual effects.
    Liu C; Jin SH; Chen CT
    Lang Speech; 2014 Jun; 57(Pt 2):238-53. PubMed ID: 25102608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contextual variation in the acoustic and perceptual similarity of North German and American English vowels.
    Strange W; Bohn OS; Nishi K; Trent SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Sep; 118(3 Pt 1):1751-62. PubMed ID: 16240833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A sindscal analysis of perceptual features for consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal talkers.
    Doyle PC; Danhauer JL; Mendel LL
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1990 Nov; 55(4):756-60. PubMed ID: 2232755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Hebrew vowel system: raw and normalized acoustic data.
    Most T; Amir O; Tobin Y
    Lang Speech; 2000; 43(Pt 3):295-308. PubMed ID: 11216297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.
    Liu C; Jin SH
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Acoustic Analysis of Voice and Speech in Men with Skeletal Class III Malocclusion: A Pilot Study.
    Viegas F; Viegas D; Serra Guimarães G; Ritto F; Simões-Zenari M; Nemr K
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2021; 73(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 32036357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Auditory and categorical effects on cross-language vowel perception.
    Flege JE; Munro MJ; Fox RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jun; 95(6):3623-41. PubMed ID: 8046152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Acoustic and perceptual similarity of Japanese and American English vowels.
    Nishi K; Strange W; Akahane-Yamada R; Kubo R; Trent-Brown SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):576-88. PubMed ID: 18647000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Articulation of extreme formant patterns for emphasized vowels.
    Erickson D
    Phonetica; 2002; 59(2-3):134-49. PubMed ID: 12232464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Vocal roughness and jitter characteristics of vowels produced by esophageal speakers.
    Smith BE; Weinberg B; Feth LL; Horii Y
    J Speech Hear Res; 1978 Jun; 21(2):240-9. PubMed ID: 703274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Acoustic Analysis of Taiwanese Tones in Esophageal Speech and Pneumatic Artificial Laryngeal Speech.
    Hong SW; Chan RW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Apr; 65(4):1215-1227. PubMed ID: 35226568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Formant characteristics of vowels produced by Mandarin esophageal speakers.
    Liu H; Ng ML
    J Voice; 2009 Mar; 23(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 18082365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of total laryngectomy on vowel production: An acoustic study of vowels produced by alaryngeal speakers of Cantonese.
    Ng ML; Woo HK
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2021 Dec; 23(6):652-661. PubMed ID: 33615923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.