These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3237888)
21. The prediction of violent behavior during short-term civil commitment. Kirk A Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 2605361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [What is the impact of the dispositions of July 5, 2011 on care, 2 years after?]. Vacheron MN Encephale; 2014 Apr; 40(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 24060379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Patient consent and psychiatric emergency care. Inclusions and non-inclusions of the 27 June 1990 law]. Pichene C; Patault AM; Guillemot-Guerci A; Laxenaire M Ann Med Psychol (Paris); 1992; 150(6):427-8; discussion 428-9. PubMed ID: 1342772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Of the parens patriae commitment power and drug treatment of schizophrenia: do the benefits to the patient justify involuntary treatment? DuBose EZ Minn Law Rev; 1976 Jun; 60(6):1149-218. PubMed ID: 11664731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluations of dangerousness. Kress F Schizophr Bull; 1979; 5(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 462138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Civil commitment: a review of traditional arrangements in the provision of involuntary hospitalization of the mentally ill. Strong HR Can J Psychiatry; 1983 Jun; 28(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 6871819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Studies in involuntary civil commitment and involuntary electroconvulsive therapy. Mahler H; Co BT; Dinwiddie S J Nerv Ment Dis; 1986 Feb; 174(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 3944600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Elements of state coercion in health care: selected issues]. Garus-Pakowska A; Pakowski M Med Pr; 2011; 62(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 21748885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The obviously ill patient in need of treatment: a fourth standard for civil commitment. Treffert DA Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Mar; 36(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 3979975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Obligatory dangerousness criteria in the involuntary commitment and treatment provisions of Australian mental health legislation. King R; Robinson J Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 21112634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Criminal justice procedures in civil commitment. Slovenko R Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1977 Nov; 28(11):817-26. PubMed ID: 914239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Beyond the black letter of the law: an empirical study of an individual judge's decision process for civil commitment hearings. Bursztajn HJ; Hamm RM; Gutheil TG J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):79-94. PubMed ID: 9148885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Coercion and legal protection in psychiatric care in Finland. Kokkonen P Med Law; 1993; 12(1-2):113-24. PubMed ID: 8377603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessments of the dangerousness of mental patients held in maximum security. Quinsey VL Int J Law Psychiatry; 1979; 2(3):389-406. PubMed ID: 511414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Reform of "hogosha" system and psychiatric practice in Japan. Shiraishi H Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol; 1994; 48 Suppl():117-24. PubMed ID: 7799536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Psychiatric home care. An evolving legal standard. Julavits WF Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1985 Sep; 8(3):577-86. PubMed ID: 3877273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]