These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32381237)

  • 1. Forensic touch DNA recovery from metal surfaces - A review.
    Bonsu DOM; Higgins D; Austin JJ
    Sci Justice; 2020 May; 60(3):206-215. PubMed ID: 32381237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Touch DNA recovery from unfired and fired cartridges: Comparison of swabbing, tape lifting and soaking.
    Prasad E; Hitchcock C; Raymond J; Cole A; Barash M; McNevin D; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Jan; 330():111101. PubMed ID: 34801815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increased recovery of touch DNA evidence using FTA paper compared to conventional collection methods.
    Kirgiz IA; Calloway C
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 Apr; 47():9-15. PubMed ID: 28171796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DNA recovery from unfired and fired cartridge cases: A comparison of swabbing, tape lifting, vacuum filtration, and direct PCR.
    Prasad E; Hitchcock C; Raymond J; Cole A; Barash M; Gunn P; McNevin D; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Dec; 317():110507. PubMed ID: 32977300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recovery of Trace DNA on Clothing: A Comparison of Mini-tape Lifting and Three Other Forensic Evidence Collection Techniques.
    Hess S; Haas C
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jan; 62(1):187-191. PubMed ID: 27864934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Isohelix™ and Rayon swabbing systems for touch DNA recovery from metal surfaces.
    Bonsu DOM; Rodie M; Higgins D; Henry J; Austin JJ
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2021 Dec; 17(4):577-584. PubMed ID: 34674113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct PCR amplification of forensic touch and other challenging DNA samples: A review.
    Cavanaugh SE; Bathrick AS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jan; 32():40-49. PubMed ID: 29059581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trace DNA Sampling Success from Evidence Items Commonly Encountered in Forensic Casework.
    Dziak R; Peneder A; Buetter A; Hageman C
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 May; 63(3):835-841. PubMed ID: 28921603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of Diamond™ Nucleic Acid Dye for the identification and targeted sampling of latent DNA in operational casework.
    Cook R; Mitchell N; Henry J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Nov; 55():102579. PubMed ID: 34455366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Touch DNA Sampling Methods: Efficacy Evaluation and Systematic Review.
    Tozzo P; Mazzobel E; Marcante B; Delicati A; Caenazzo L
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Dec; 23(24):. PubMed ID: 36555182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Single source DNA profile recovery from single cells isolated from skin and fabric from touch DNA mixtures in mock physical assaults.
    Farash K; Hanson EK; Ballantyne J
    Sci Justice; 2018 May; 58(3):191-199. PubMed ID: 29685301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of the M-Vac® wet-vacuum system as a method for DNA recovery.
    Vickar T; Bache K; Daniel B; Frascione N
    Sci Justice; 2018 Jul; 58(4):282-286. PubMed ID: 29895461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The DNA-Buster: The evaluation of an alternative DNA recovery approach.
    Währer J; Kehm S; Allen M; Brauer L; Eidam O; Seiberle I; Kron S; Scheurer E; Schulz I
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 May; 64():102830. PubMed ID: 36702080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Collecting touch DNA from glass surfaces using different sampling solutions and volumes: Immediate and storage effects on genetic STR analysis.
    Schulte J; Rittiner N; Seiberle I; Kron S; Schulz I
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jul; 68(4):1133-1147. PubMed ID: 37282776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Collaborative swab performance comparison and the impact of sampling solution volumes on DNA recovery.
    Seiberle I; Währer J; Kron S; Flury K; Girardin M; Schocker A; Schulz I
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102716. PubMed ID: 35512614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combined DNA Typing and Protein Identification from Unfired Brass Cartridges,,
    Sterling SA; Mason KE; Anex DS; Parker GJ; Hart B; Prinz M
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Sep; 64(5):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 30893480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of swabbing solutions on DNA recovery from touch samples.
    Thomasma SM; Foran DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):465-9. PubMed ID: 23278347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An assessment of tape-lifts.
    Kanokwongnuwut P; Paul Kirkbride K; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102292. PubMed ID: 32248081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PE-Swab Direct STR Amplification of Forensic Touch DNA Samples.
    Liu JY
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):693-701. PubMed ID: 25684449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "Getting blood from a stone": ultrasensitive forensic DNA profiling of microscopic bio-particles recovered from "touch DNA" evidence.
    Hanson EK; Ballantyne J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1039():3-17. PubMed ID: 24026682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.