These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32381240)

  • 1. Is it possible to predict the origin of epithelial cells? - A comparison of secondary transfer of skin epithelial cells versus vaginal mucous membrane cells by direct contact.
    Bouzga MM; Dørum G; Gundersen K; Kohler P; Hoff-Olsen P; Fonneløp AE
    Sci Justice; 2020 May; 60(3):234-242. PubMed ID: 32381240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the presence of female DNA on post-coital penile swabs: Relevance to the investigation of sexual assault.
    Farmen RK; Haukeli I; Ruoff P; Frøyland ES
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2012 Oct; 19(7):386-9. PubMed ID: 22920760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of offender DNA following skin-to-skin contact with a victim.
    Bowman ZE; Mosse KSA; Sungaila AM; van Oorschot RAH; Hartman D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():252-259. PubMed ID: 30268683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transfer, persistence and recovery of DNA and mRNA vaginal mucosa markers after intimate and social contact with Bayesian network analysis for activity level reporting.
    Johannessen H; Gill P; Shanthan G; Fonneløp AE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Sep; 60():102750. PubMed ID: 35914368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of DNA evidence recovered from epithelial cells in penile swabs.
    Drobnic K
    Croat Med J; 2003 Jun; 44(3):350-4. PubMed ID: 12808732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DNA preparation from sexual assault cases by selective degradation of contaminating DNA from the victim.
    Garvin AM; Bottinelli M; Gola M; Conti A; Soldati G
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Nov; 54(6):1297-303. PubMed ID: 19818111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Information from penile swabs in sexual assault cases.
    Keating SM
    Forensic Sci Int; 1989 Sep; 43(1):63-81. PubMed ID: 2480318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Isolation and identification of female DNA on postcoital penile swabs.
    Cina SJ; Collins KA; Pettenati MJ; Fitts M
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2000 Jun; 21(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 10871120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single source DNA profile recovery from single cells isolated from skin and fabric from touch DNA mixtures in mock physical assaults.
    Farash K; Hanson EK; Ballantyne J
    Sci Justice; 2018 May; 58(3):191-199. PubMed ID: 29685301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Post-coital vaginal sampling with nylon flocked swabs improves DNA typing.
    Benschop CC; Wiebosch DC; Kloosterman AD; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2010 Feb; 4(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 20129470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Y-short tandem repeat specific DNA enhancement strategy to aid the analysis of late reported (≥ 6 days) sexual assault cases.
    Hanson E; Ballantyne J
    Med Sci Law; 2014 Oct; 54(4):209-18. PubMed ID: 24526669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time since intercourse (TSI) data from a large-scale casework study of penile-vaginal penetration allegations using Sperm Elution​™.
    Owers R; Davidson G; McDonald A; Morgan R; O'Rourke P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():10-13. PubMed ID: 29705584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Isolating DNA from sexual assault cases: a comparison of standard methods with a nuclease-based approach.
    Garvin AM; Fischer A; Schnee-Griese J; Jelinski A; Bottinelli M; Soldati G; Tubio M; Castella V; Monney N; Malik N; Madrid M
    Investig Genet; 2012 Dec; 3(1):25. PubMed ID: 23211019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DNA transfer through nonintimate social contact.
    Jones S; Scott K; Lewis J; Davidson G; Allard JE; Lowrie C; McBride BM; McKenna L; Teppett G; Rogers C; Clayson N; Baird A
    Sci Justice; 2016 Mar; 56(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 26976466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combined Statistical Analyses of Forensic Evidence in Sexual Assault: A Case Report and Brief Review of the Literature.
    Tozzo P; Gabbin A; Politi C; Da Pian M; Caenazzo L; Causin V
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Sep; 65(5):1767-1773. PubMed ID: 32615002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Background levels of male DNA in the vaginal cavity.
    Albani PP; Patel J; Fleming RI
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Mar; 33():110-116. PubMed ID: 29245063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sampling touch DNA from human skin following skin-to-skin contact in mock assault scenarios-A comparison of nine collection methods.
    Kallupurackal V; Kummer S; Voegeli P; Kratzer A; Dørum G; Haas C; Hess S
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1889-1900. PubMed ID: 33928655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Differentiation of epithelial cell types by cell diameter].
    Evers H; Birngruber CG; Ramsthaler F; Müller U; Brück S; Verhoff MA
    Arch Kriminol; 2011; 228(1-2):11-9. PubMed ID: 21850882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of stubbing and the double swab method for collecting offender epithelial material from a victim's skin.
    de Bruin KG; Verheij SM; Veenhoven M; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 21606013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Letter to the Editor: Commentary on "Is it possible to predict the origin of epithelial cells? - A comparison of secondary transfer of skin epithelial cells versus vaginal mucous membrane cells by direct contact, M.M. Bouzga et al., Science &Justice, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2020.02.003".
    Biedermann A
    Sci Justice; 2020 May; 60(3):201-203. PubMed ID: 32381235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.