These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32381684)

  • 21. Hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions across primary care models in Ontario, Canada.
    Laberge M; Wodchis WP; Barnsley J; Laporte A
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 May; 181():24-33. PubMed ID: 28365547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of remuneration and organizational factors on completing preventive manoeuvres in primary care practices.
    Dahrouge S; Hogg WE; Russell G; Tuna M; Geneau R; Muldoon LK; Kristjansson E; Fletcher J
    CMAJ; 2012 Feb; 184(2):E135-43. PubMed ID: 22143227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. High Levels Of Capitation Payments Needed To Shift Primary Care Toward Proactive Team And Nonvisit Care.
    Basu S; Phillips RS; Song Z; Bitton A; Landon BE
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2017 Sep; 36(9):1599-1605. PubMed ID: 28874487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Health care purchasing in Kenya: Experiences of health care providers with capitation and fee-for-service provider payment mechanisms.
    Obadha M; Chuma J; Kazungu J; Barasa E
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 2019 Jan; 34(1):e917-e933. PubMed ID: 30426557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Defining the practice population in fee-for-service practice.
    Hutchison BG; Hurley J; Birch S; Lomas J; Stratford-Devai F
    Health Serv Res; 1997 Apr; 32(1):55-70. PubMed ID: 9108804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing primary care Interprofessional and non-interprofessional teams on access to care and health services utilization in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective cohort study.
    Haj-Ali W; Hutchison B; Moineddin R; Wodchis WP; Glazier RH
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Sep; 21(1):963. PubMed ID: 34521410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of primary care physician payment models in the management of hypertension.
    Tu K; Cauch-Dudek K; Chen Z
    Can Fam Physician; 2009 Jul; 55(7):719-27. PubMed ID: 19602662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Patient attitudes toward physician financial incentives.
    Pereira AG; Pearson SD
    Arch Intern Med; 2001 May; 161(10):1313-7. PubMed ID: 11371260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in Ontario, Canada.
    Lofters AK; Mark A; Taljaard M; Green ME; Glazier RH; Dahrouge S
    BMC Fam Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(1):147. PubMed ID: 30157772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quality of asthma care under different primary care models in Canada: a population-based study.
    To T; Guan J; Zhu J; Lougheed MD; Kaplan A; Tamari I; Stanbrook MB; Simatovic J; Feldman L; Gershon AS
    BMC Fam Pract; 2015 Feb; 16():19. PubMed ID: 25886504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Blended capitation and incentives: Fee codes inside and outside the capitated basket.
    Zhang X; Sweetman A
    J Health Econ; 2018 Jul; 60():16-29. PubMed ID: 29843017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of primary care models in the prevention of cardiovascular disease - a cross sectional study.
    Liddy C; Singh J; Hogg W; Dahrouge S; Taljaard M
    BMC Fam Pract; 2011 Oct; 12():114. PubMed ID: 22008366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does Primary Care Model Effect Healthcare at the End of Life? A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Howard M; Chalifoux M; Tanuseputro P
    J Palliat Med; 2017 Apr; 20(4):344-351. PubMed ID: 27893954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The impact of the adoption of a patient rostering model on primary care access and continuity of care in urban family practices in Ontario, Canada.
    Singh J; Dahrouge S; Green ME
    BMC Fam Pract; 2019 Apr; 20(1):52. PubMed ID: 30999868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Do new and traditional models of primary care differ with regard to access?: Canadian QUALICOPC study.
    Miedema B; Easley J; Thompson AE; Boivin A; Aubrey-Bassler K; Katz A; Hogg WE; Breton M; Francoeur D; Wong ST; Wodchis WP
    Can Fam Physician; 2016 Jan; 62(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 27331231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Blended payment methods in physician organizations under managed care.
    Robinson JC
    JAMA; 1999 Oct; 282(13):1258-63. PubMed ID: 10517429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effects of payment method on clinical decision-making: physician responses to clinical scenarios.
    Shen J; Andersen R; Brook R; Kominski G; Albert PS; Wenger N
    Med Care; 2004 Mar; 42(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 15076830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does a year make a difference? Changes in physician satisfaction and perception in an increasingly capitated environment.
    Nadler ES; Sims S; Tyrance PH; Fairchild DG; Brennan TA; Bates DW
    Am J Med; 1999 Jul; 107(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 10403351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stirring the pot: Switching from blended fee-for-service to blended capitation models of physician remuneration.
    Somé NH; Devlin RA; Mehta N; Zaric GS; Sarma S
    Health Econ; 2020 Nov; 29(11):1435-1455. PubMed ID: 32812685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effects of medical group practice and physician payment methods on costs of care.
    Kralewski JE; Rich EC; Feldman R; Dowd BE; Bernhardt T; Johnson C; Gold W
    Health Serv Res; 2000 Aug; 35(3):591-613. PubMed ID: 10966087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.