171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32381826)
1. Evaluation of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Combinations of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Material: An
Mahagaonkar PA; Angadi PB; Naik NR; Kakatkar V; Manjunath SH; Sonawane YS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Feb; 21(2):190-196. PubMed ID: 32381826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Stone Models Fabricated by Three Different Impression Techniques Using Two Brands of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials.
Garg S; Kumar S; Jain S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Aug; 20(8):928-934. PubMed ID: 31797849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of three polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques.
Nissan J; Laufer BZ; Brosh T; Assif D
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Feb; 83(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 10668027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of wash bulk on the accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impressions.
Nissan J; Gross M; Shifman A; Assif D
J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Apr; 29(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 11966969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of dimensional accuracy of different polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques-in vitro study.
Dugal R; Railkar B; Musani S
J Int Oral Health; 2013 Oct; 5(5):85-94. PubMed ID: 24324310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Linear dimensional accuracy of a polyvinyl siloxane of varying viscosities using different impression techniques.
Mishra S; Chowdhary R
J Investig Clin Dent; 2010 Aug; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25427185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.
Rajapur A; Dixit S; Hoshing C; Raikar SP
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):824-9. PubMed ID: 23404010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials Using Three Different Techniques for Implant Impressions: An
Khan SA; Singh S; Neyaz N; Jaiswal MM; Tanwar AS; Singh A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):172-178. PubMed ID: 34257178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Working times and dimensional accuracy of the one-step putty/wash impression technique.
Richards MW; Zeiaei S; Bagby MD; Okubo S; Soltani J
J Prosthodont; 1998 Dec; 7(4):250-5. PubMed ID: 10196845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions.
Del'acqua MA; de Avila ÉD; Amaral ÂL; Pinelli LA; de Assis Mollo F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 22616047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A clinical pilot study of the dimensional accuracy of double-arch and complete-arch impressions.
Cox JR; Brandt RL; Hughes HJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 May; 87(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12070514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of impressions with different impression materials in angulated implants.
Reddy S; Prasad K; Vakil H; Jain A; Chowdhary R
Niger J Clin Pract; 2013; 16(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 23771446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study.
Saini HS; Jain S; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30150505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative evaluation of tray spacer thickness and repeat pour on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinyl siloxane impression material: in vitro study.
Kumar S; Yadav D; Yadav R; Arora A
Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 24992848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of Intermixing Brands on the Dimensional Accuracy of Master Cast using Putty-wash Impression Technique.
Sayed ME; Sayed ME; Al-Makramani BM; Al-Sanabani FA; Mohamed MS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Sep; 17(9):734-739. PubMed ID: 27733716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Margin adaptation of indirect composite inlays fabricated on flexible dies.
Price RB; Gerrow JD
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 10709039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of impression tray design and impression technique upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Taylor WG
J Dent; 1991 Oct; 19(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 1806594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
