These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32381842)
1. Impact of Surface Treatment Methods on Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets to Indirect Composite Provisional Restorations. Borzangy S J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Dec; 20(12):1412-1416. PubMed ID: 32381842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of surface conditioning on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to temporary polycarbonate crowns. Blakey R; Mah J Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 20620836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces. Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets to zirconium crowns treated by sandblasting compared to enamel using a universal adhesive: An in vitro study. Namvar F; Shahrebabak MZ; Arab S; Tabrizi MA; Ghasemi A; Safari F Int Orthod; 2022 Jun; 20(2):100640. PubMed ID: 35654673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of surface treatments and flash-free adhesive on the shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to CAD/CAM provisional materials. Soliman TA; Ghorab S; Baeshen H Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):481-492. PubMed ID: 34605975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shear bond strength evaluation of metallic brackets bonded to a CAD/CAM PMMA material compared to traditional prosthetic temporary materials: an in vitro study. Garcés GA; Rojas VH; Bravo C; Sampaio CS Dental Press J Orthod; 2020 May; 25(3):31-38. PubMed ID: 32844970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of shear bond strength of metal brackets bonded to porcelain surface using different surface conditioning methods: an in vitro study. Girish PV; Dinesh U; Bhat CS; Shetty PC J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):487-93. PubMed ID: 23151698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to a CAD/CAM prosthetic provisional material after the use of a self-adhesive resin cement versus a light adhesive paste and different surface conditioning protocols: An in vitro study. Morales K; Garces G; Yagnam S; Bustos V; Belfus J; Rojas V Int Orthod; 2022 Sep; 20(3):100661. PubMed ID: 35764503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization. Ozcan M; Finnema K; Ybema A Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18209212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro comparison of shear bond strengths of ceramic orthodontic brackets with ceramic crowns using an aluminium oxide air abrasion etchant. Oldham CC; Ballard RW; Yu Q; Kee EL; Xu X; Armbruster PC Int Orthod; 2020 Mar; 18(1):115-120. PubMed ID: 31471241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of lithium disilicate-reinforced glass ceramic surface treatment with hydrofluoric acid, Nd:YAG, and CO2 lasers on shear bond strength of metal brackets. Alavi S; Samie S; Raji SAH Clin Oral Investig; 2021 May; 25(5):2659-2666. PubMed ID: 32918122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study of the effect of Er:YAG and Er:Cr;YSGG lasers on porcelain: etching for the bonding of orthodontic brackets. Mirhashemi A; Chiniforush N; Jadidi H; Sharifi N Lasers Med Sci; 2018 Dec; 33(9):1997-2005. PubMed ID: 29980947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bond strength of orthodontic brackets with new self-adhesive resin cements. Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 20362914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of shear bond strength between metal and ceramic brackets and artificially aged composite restorations using different surface treatments. Eslamian L; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Mousavi N; Ghasemi A Eur J Orthod; 2012 Oct; 34(5):610-7. PubMed ID: 21447779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of phototherapy on bond strength and failure modes of enamel bonded to ceramic and metallic brackets with different surface treatment regimes. Almoammar S Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2019 Jun; 26():214-217. PubMed ID: 30940576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of surface preparation on shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Elnafar AA; Alam MK; Hasan R J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 25143559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to various esthetic pontic materials. Maryanchik I; Brendlinger EJ; Fallis DW; Vandewalle KS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):684-9. PubMed ID: 20451789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of surface treatment and aging on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets to provisional materials. Chay SH; Wong SL; Mohamed N; Chia A; Yap AU Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):577.e7-11. PubMed ID: 18005828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Shear bond strength comparison between direct and indirect bonded orthodontic brackets. Yi GK; Dunn WJ; Taloumis LJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Nov; 124(5):577-81. PubMed ID: 14614426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bonding polycarbonate brackets to ceramic: effects of substrate treatment on bond strength. Ozcan M; Vallittu PK; Peltomäki T; Huysmans MC; Kalk W Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Aug; 126(2):220-7. PubMed ID: 15316478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]