These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32382098)

  • 1. MetaGeneHunt for protein domain annotation in short-read metagenomes.
    Berlemont R; Winans N; Talamantes D; Dang H; Tsai HW
    Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):7712. PubMed ID: 32382098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multi-source domain annotation pipeline for quantitative metagenomic and metatranscriptomic functional profiling.
    Ugarte A; Vicedomini R; Bernardes J; Carbone A
    Microbiome; 2018 Aug; 6(1):149. PubMed ID: 30153857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MinION™ nanopore sequencing of environmental metagenomes: a synthetic approach.
    Brown BL; Watson M; Minot SS; Rivera MC; Franklin RB
    Gigascience; 2017 Mar; 6(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 28327976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Artificial functional difference between microbial communities caused by length difference of sequencing reads.
    Zhang Q; Doak TG; Ye Y
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2012; ():259-70. PubMed ID: 22174281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A most wanted list of conserved microbial protein families with no known domains.
    Wyman SK; Avila-Herrera A; Nayfach S; Pollard KS
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205749. PubMed ID: 30332487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. GeneHunt for rapid domain-specific annotation of glycoside hydrolases.
    Nguyen SN; Flores A; Talamantes D; Dar F; Valdez A; Schwans J; Berlemont R
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10137. PubMed ID: 31300677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comprehensive Functional Annotation of Metagenomes and Microbial Genomes Using a Deep Learning-Based Method.
    Maranga M; Szczerbiak P; Bezshapkin V; Gligorijevic V; Chandler C; Bonneau R; Xavier RJ; Vatanen T; Kosciolek T
    mSystems; 2023 Apr; 8(2):e0117822. PubMed ID: 37010293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MG-RAST, a Metagenomics Service for Analysis of Microbial Community Structure and Function.
    Keegan KP; Glass EM; Meyer F
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1399():207-33. PubMed ID: 26791506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-Read Sequencing Improves Recovery of Picoeukaryotic Genomes and Zooplankton Marker Genes from Marine Metagenomes.
    Patin NV; Goodwin KD
    mSystems; 2022 Dec; 7(6):e0059522. PubMed ID: 36448813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating techniques for metagenome annotation using simulated sequence data.
    Randle-Boggis RJ; Helgason T; Sapp M; Ashton PD
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2016 Jul; 92(7):. PubMed ID: 27162180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MIPE: A metagenome-based community structure explorer and SSU primer evaluation tool.
    Zou B; Li J; Zhou Q; Quan ZX
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174609. PubMed ID: 28350876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated and Accurate Estimation of Gene Family Abundance from Shotgun Metagenomes.
    Nayfach S; Bradley PH; Wyman SK; Laurent TJ; Williams A; Eisen JA; Pollard KS; Sharpton TJ
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Nov; 11(11):e1004573. PubMed ID: 26565399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PanFP: pangenome-based functional profiles for microbial communities.
    Jun SR; Robeson MS; Hauser LJ; Schadt CW; Gorin AA
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Sep; 8():479. PubMed ID: 26409790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pre- and post-sequencing recommendations for functional annotation of human fecal metagenomes.
    Treiber ML; Taft DH; Korf I; Mills DA; Lemay DG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Feb; 21(1):74. PubMed ID: 32093654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Metagenomics methods for the study of plant-associated microbial communities: A review.
    Fadiji AE; Babalola OO
    J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Mar; 170():105860. PubMed ID: 32027927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MetaEuk-sensitive, high-throughput gene discovery, and annotation for large-scale eukaryotic metagenomics.
    Levy Karin E; Mirdita M; Söding J
    Microbiome; 2020 Apr; 8(1):48. PubMed ID: 32245390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the performance of different approaches for functional and taxonomic annotation of metagenomes.
    Tamames J; Cobo-Simón M; Puente-Sánchez F
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):960. PubMed ID: 31823721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of different assembly and annotation tools on analysis of simulated viral metagenomic communities in the gut.
    Vázquez-Castellanos JF; García-López R; Pérez-Brocal V; Pignatelli M; Moya A
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jan; 15():37. PubMed ID: 24438450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Autometa: automated extraction of microbial genomes from individual shotgun metagenomes.
    Miller IJ; Rees ER; Ross J; Miller I; Baxa J; Lopera J; Kerby RL; Rey FE; Kwan JC
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Jun; 47(10):e57. PubMed ID: 30838416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating
    Vosloo S; Huo L; Anderson CL; Dai Z; Sevillano M; Pinto A
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Dec; 9(3):e0143421. PubMed ID: 34730411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.