246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32383196)
1. Efficacy and adverse events of 4% articaine compared with 2% lidocaine on primary molar extraction: A randomised controlled trial.
Massignan C; Silveira Santos P; Cardoso M; Bolan M
J Oral Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 47(8):1031-1040. PubMed ID: 32383196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 buccal infiltration for single maxillary molar extraction: a double-blind, randomised, clinical trial.
Rayati F; Haeri M; Norouziha A; Jabbarian R
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jul; 59(6):695-699. PubMed ID: 34053801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anesthetic Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration Articaine versus Lidocaine for Extraction of Primary Molar Teeth.
Rathi NV; Khatri AA; Agrawal AG; M SB; Thosar NR; Deolia SG
Anesth Prog; 2019; 66(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 30883236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar after an inferior alveolar nerve block.
Haase A; Reader A; Nusstein J; Beck M; Drum M
J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 139(9):1228-35. PubMed ID: 18762633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in Equivalent Doses as Buccal and Non-Palatal Infiltration for Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.
Majid OW; Ahmed AM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Apr; 76(4):737-743. PubMed ID: 29257943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anesthetic comparisons of 4% concentrations of articaine, lidocaine, and prilocaine as primary buccal infiltrations of the mandibular first molar: a prospective randomized, double-blind study.
Nydegger B; Nusstein J; Reader A; Drum M; Beck M
J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1912-6. PubMed ID: 25218523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Local anaesthesia for surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Yang F; Gao Y; Zhang L; Zheng B; Wang L; Sun H; Huang D
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Nov; 24(11):3781-3800. PubMed ID: 32833132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the efficacy of a standard inferior alveolar nerve block versus articaine infiltration for invasive dental treatment in permanent mandibular molars in children: a pilot study.
Jorgenson K; Burbridge L; Cole B
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2020 Feb; 21(1):171-177. PubMed ID: 31832992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine During Primary Maxillary Molar Extractions in Children.
Mittal M; Sharma S; Kumar A; Chopra R; Srivastava D
Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(7):520-4. PubMed ID: 26883609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vivo, randomized, controlled comparative evaluation of efficacy, hemodynamic changes, and postoperative complications of 4% articaine using buccal infiltration and 2% lidocaine using inferior alveolar nerve block in mandibular primary molars of children aged 6 to 8 years.
Khanna SR; Rao D; Panwar S; Ameen S
Quintessence Int; 2021 Sep; 52(9):780-786. PubMed ID: 34076382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine infiltration versus 2% lignocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for extraction of primary mandibular molars: A prospective, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial.
Jain K; Katge F; Chimata VK; Patil D; Ghadge S; Bhanushali N
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2021; 39(4):409-415. PubMed ID: 35102967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of buccal infiltration anaesthesia with articaine for extraction of mandibular molars: a clinical trial.
Rayati F; Noruziha A; Jabbarian R
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 56(7):607-610. PubMed ID: 29980352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Articaine use does not routinely eliminate the need for palatal injections for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized cross-over clinical trial.
Bahrololoomi Z; Maghsoudi N
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Dec; 26(4):603-611. PubMed ID: 34853915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
Berlin J; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 15716846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
Rogers BS; Botero TM; McDonald NJ; Gardner RJ; Peters MC
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):753-8. PubMed ID: 24862701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Buffered 4% Articaine as a Primary Buccal Infiltration of the Mandibular First Molar: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study.
Shurtz R; Nusstein J; Reader A; Drum M; Fowler S; Beck M
J Endod; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1403-7. PubMed ID: 26095381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of Articaine versus Lidocaine in Supplemental Infiltration for Mandibular First versus Second Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial.
Shapiro MR; McDonald NJ; Gardner RJ; Peters MC; Botero TM
J Endod; 2018 Apr; 44(4):523-528. PubMed ID: 29397214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
Nusstein J; Berlin J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver JM
Anesth Prog; 2004; 51(4):126-33. PubMed ID: 15675261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study of the anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine with adrenaline during extraction of mandibular molars using an inferior alveolar nerve blocking technique.
Vishal G; Dandriyal R; Indra B N; Singh HP; Chaurasia A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Sep; 59(7):783-787. PubMed ID: 34301445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Anaesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine Primary Buccal Infiltration Versus 2% Lidocaine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Symptomatic Mandibular First Molar Teeth.
Zain M; Rehman Khattak SU; Sikandar H; Shah SA; Fayyaz
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 Jan; 26(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 26787022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
