BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32383599)

  • 1. Metadynamics as a Postprocessing Method for Virtual Screening with Application to the Pseudokinase Domain of JAK2.
    Cutrona KJ; Newton AS; Krimmer SG; Tirado-Rives J; Jorgensen WL
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Sep; 60(9):4403-4415. PubMed ID: 32383599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
    Deng N; Flynn WF; Xia J; Vijayan RS; Zhang B; He P; Mentes A; Gallicchio E; Levy RM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):743-751. PubMed ID: 27562018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimizing false positives in kinase virtual screens.
    Perola E
    Proteins; 2006 Aug; 64(2):422-35. PubMed ID: 16708364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of docking and QM/MM-GBSA rescoring to screen for novel Myt1 kinase inhibitors.
    Wichapong K; Rohe A; Platzer C; Slynko I; Erdmann F; Schmidt M; Sippl W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Mar; 54(3):881-93. PubMed ID: 24490903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rescoring docking hit lists for model cavity sites: predictions and experimental testing.
    Graves AP; Shivakumar DM; Boyce SE; Jacobson MP; Case DA; Shoichet BK
    J Mol Biol; 2008 Mar; 377(3):914-34. PubMed ID: 18280498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining docking with pharmacophore filtering for improved virtual screening.
    Peach ML; Nicklaus MC
    J Cheminform; 2009 May; 1(1):6. PubMed ID: 20298524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative docking of dual conformations in human fatty acid synthase thioesterase domain reveals potential binding cavity for virtual screening of ligands.
    John A; Vetrivel U; Subramanian K; Deepa PR
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2017 May; 35(6):1350-1366. PubMed ID: 27145135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
    Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
    Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.
    Perola E; Walters WP; Charifson PS
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 15211508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Catalytic site prediction and virtual screening of cytochrome P450 2D6 substrates by consideration of water and rescoring in automated docking.
    de Graaf C; Oostenbrink C; Keizers PH; van der Wijst T; Jongejan A; Vermeulen NP
    J Med Chem; 2006 Apr; 49(8):2417-30. PubMed ID: 16610785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Targeting the NF-κB/IκBα complex via fragment-based E-Pharmacophore virtual screening and binary QSAR models.
    Kanan T; Kanan D; Erol I; Yazdi S; Stein M; Durdagi S
    J Mol Graph Model; 2019 Jan; 86():264-277. PubMed ID: 30415122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficient conformational sampling and weak scoring in docking programs? Strategy of the wisdom of crowds.
    Chaput L; Mouawad L
    J Cheminform; 2017 Jun; 9(1):37. PubMed ID: 29086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
    Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of MM-PBSA Methods in Virtual Screening.
    Poli G; Granchi C; Rizzolio F; Tuccinardi T
    Molecules; 2020 Apr; 25(8):. PubMed ID: 32340232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Virtual screening by 2-D fingerprints, shape and docking for discovering new chemotypes of activator protein-1 inhibitors.
    Yin Z
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2021 Apr; 39(7):2455-2462. PubMed ID: 32223539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple ligand docking by Glide: implications for virtual second-site screening.
    Vass M; Tarcsay Á; Keserű GM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Jul; 26(7):821-34. PubMed ID: 22639078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Docking and Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery.
    Kontoyianni M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1647():255-266. PubMed ID: 28809009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.