These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32383824)

  • 1. Clinical Study Demonstrates that Electromagnetic Muscle Stimulation Does Not Cause Injury to Fat Cells.
    Zachary CB; Burns AJ; Pham LD; Jimenez Lozano JN
    Lasers Surg Med; 2021 Jan; 53(1):70-78. PubMed ID: 32383824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feasibility Study of Electromagnetic Muscle Stimulation and Cryolipolysis for Abdominal Contouring.
    Kilmer SL; Cox SE; Zelickson BD; Bachelor EP; Gamio S; Ostrowski R; Pham LD; Stevens WG
    Dermatol Surg; 2020 Oct; 46 Suppl 1(1):S14-S21. PubMed ID: 32976168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prototype CoolCup cryolipolysis applicator with over 40% reduced treatment time demonstrates equivalent safety and efficacy with greater patient preference.
    Kilmer SL
    Lasers Surg Med; 2017 Jan; 49(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 27327898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subcutaneous adipose tissue response to a non-invasive hyperthermic treatment using a 1,060 nm laser.
    Decorato JW; Chen B; Sierra R
    Lasers Surg Med; 2017 Jul; 49(5):480-489. PubMed ID: 28103642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cryolipolysis: A promising nonsurgical technique for localized fat reduction.
    Kania B; Goldberg DJ
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2023 Nov; 22 Suppl 3():1-7. PubMed ID: 37988716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple same day cryolipolysis treatments for the reduction of subcutaneous fat are safe and do not affect serum lipid levels or liver function tests.
    Klein KB; Bachelor EP; Becker EV; Bowes LE
    Lasers Surg Med; 2017 Sep; 49(7):640-644. PubMed ID: 28464272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Paradoxical adipose hyperplasia secondary to cryolipolysis: An underreported entity?
    Singh SM; Geddes ER; Boutrous SG; Galiano RD; Friedman PM
    Lasers Surg Med; 2015 Aug; 47(6):476-8. PubMed ID: 26096832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Induction of fat apoptosis by a non-thermal device: Mechanism of action of non-invasive high-intensity electromagnetic technology in a porcine model.
    Weiss RA; Bernardy J
    Lasers Surg Med; 2019 Jan; 51(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 30549290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the Efficacy of Cryolipolysis on Abdominal Fat Deposits: A Prospective Study.
    Coiante E; Pensato R; Hadji I; Lo Giudice G; Pizza C; SidAhmed-Mezi M; D'Andrea F; Meningaud JP; Hersant B; La Padula S
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Dec; 47(6):2679-2686. PubMed ID: 37138191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety and efficacy of cryolipolysis for non-invasive reduction of submental fat.
    Kilmer SL; Burns AJ; Zelickson BD
    Lasers Surg Med; 2016 Jan; 48(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 26607045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mouse model of selective cryolipolysis.
    Salma N; Wang-Evers M; Casper MJ; Karasik D; Andrade YJ; Tannous Z; Manstein D
    Lasers Surg Med; 2023 Jan; 55(1):126-134. PubMed ID: 35819225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical effectiveness of non-invasive selective cryolipolysis.
    Kim J; Kim DH; Ryu HJ
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2014 Oct; 16(5):209-13. PubMed ID: 25046234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved methods for selective cryolipolysis results in subcutaneous fat layer reduction in a porcine model.
    Kwon TR; Yoo KH; Oh CT; Shin DH; Choi EJ; Jung SJ; Hong H; Choi YS; Kim BJ
    Skin Res Technol; 2015 May; 21(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 25220194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel transcutaneous, non-focused ultrasound energy delivering device is able to induce subcutaneous adipose tissue destruction in an animal model.
    Levi A; Amitai DB; Lapidoth M
    Lasers Surg Med; 2017 Jan; 49(1):110-121. PubMed ID: 27794165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electromagnetic muscle stimulation: A retrospective study of patient experience.
    Moradi A; Fabi S; Rapaport D; Shridharani S; Goldman MP; Tsai Fu F
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2022 Jan; 21(1):271-278. PubMed ID: 34560820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cryolipolysis for the treatment of submental fat: Review of the literature.
    Lipner SR
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2018 Apr; 17(2):145-151. PubMed ID: 29345049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved methods for evaluating pre-clinical and histological effects of subcutaneous fat reduction using high-intensity focused ultrasound in a porcine model.
    Kwon TR; Im S; Jang YJ; Oh CT; Choi EJ; Jung SJ; Hong H; Choi YS; Choi SY; Kim YS; Kim BJ
    Skin Res Technol; 2017 May; 23(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 27511869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Non-invasive cryolipolysis to reduce subcutaneous fat in the arms.
    Lee SJ; Jang HW; Kim H; Suh DH; Ryu HJ
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2016 Jun; 18(3):126-9. PubMed ID: 26735803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cryolipolysis for safe and effective inner thigh fat reduction.
    Zelickson BD; Burns AJ; Kilmer SL
    Lasers Surg Med; 2015 Feb; 47(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 25586980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cryolipolysis for noninvasive fat cell destruction: initial results from a pig model.
    Zelickson B; Egbert BM; Preciado J; Allison J; Springer K; Rhoades RW; Manstein D
    Dermatol Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1462-70. PubMed ID: 19614940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.