114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32384666)
21. A novel nonparametric item response theory approach to measuring socioeconomic position: a comparison using household expenditure data from a Vietnam health survey, 2003.
Reidpath DD; Ahmadi K
Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2014; 11():9. PubMed ID: 25126103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Item response theory: how Mokken scaling can be used in clinical practice.
Watson R; van der Ark LA; Lin LC; Fieo R; Deary IJ; Meijer RR
J Clin Nurs; 2012 Oct; 21(19-20):2736-46. PubMed ID: 21883577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Hierarchy and Reliability of the Preschool Language Scales-Fifth Edition: Mokken Scale Analysis.
Hsiao YY; Qi CH; Hoy R; Dale PS; Stump GS; Davison MD; Xia Y
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Oct; 64(10):3983-3994. PubMed ID: 34546794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Psychometric Investigation of the Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices Test in a Sample of Preschool Children.
Lúcio PS; Cogo-Moreira H; Puglisi M; Polanczyk GV; Little TD
Assessment; 2019 Oct; 26(7):1399-1408. PubMed ID: 29121785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A latent trait approach to measuring HIV/AIDS related stigma in healthcare professionals: application of mokken scaling technique.
Ahmadi K; Reidpath DD; Allotey P; Hassali MAA
BMC Med Educ; 2016 May; 16():155. PubMed ID: 27240562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. On the Practical Consequences of Misfit in Mokken Scaling.
Crişan DR; Tendeiro JN; Meijer RR
Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Sep; 44(6):482-496. PubMed ID: 32782419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluating an Internet Gaming Disorder Scale Using Mokken Scaling Analysis.
Finserås TR; Pallesen S; Mentzoni RA; Krossbakken E; King DL; Molde H
Front Psychol; 2019; 10():911. PubMed ID: 31080426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Estimating age-stratified WAIS-R IQS from scores on the Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices.
O'Leary UM; Rusch KM; Guastello SJ
J Clin Psychol; 1991 Mar; 47(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 2030135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validity and reliability of the FIM instrument in the inpatient burn rehabilitation population.
Gerrard P; Goldstein R; Divita MA; Ryan CM; Mix J; Niewczyk P; Kazis L; Kowalske K; Zafonte R; Schneider JC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1521-1526.e4. PubMed ID: 23473701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Age-stratified norms for Raven's standard progressive matrices for Sri Lankan adults.
Dassanayake TL; Ariyasinghe DI; Baminiwatta A; Hewawasam C
Clin Neuropsychol; 2024 Jun; ():1-15. PubMed ID: 38937886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A Psychometric Analysis of Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices: Evaluating Guessing and Carelessness Using the 4PL Item Response Theory Model.
Antoniou F; Alkhadim G; Mouzaki A; Simos P
J Intell; 2022 Jan; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 35225922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A two-step, test-guided Mokken scale analysis, for nonclustered and clustered data.
Koopman L; Zijlstra BJH; van der Ark LA
Qual Life Res; 2022 Jan; 31(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 33983619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Edinburgh Feeding Evaluation in Dementia Scale: A Longitudinal Study in Nursing Home Residents.
Watson R; Bagnasco A; Catania G; Aleo G; Zanini M; Sasso L
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord; 2017; 44(3-4):196-202. PubMed ID: 28881343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Validation of the action research arm test using item response theory in patients after stroke.
Koh CL; Hsueh IP; Wang WC; Sheu CF; Yu TY; Wang CH; Hsieh CL
J Rehabil Med; 2006 Nov; 38(6):375-80. PubMed ID: 17067971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Measuring upper limb capacity in poststroke patients: development, fit of the monotone homogeneity model, unidimensionality, fit of the double monotonicity model, differential item functioning, internal consistency, and feasibility of the stroke upper limb capacity scale, SULCS.
Roorda LD; Houwink A; Smits W; Molenaar IW; Geurts AC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Feb; 92(2):214-27. PubMed ID: 21272717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Same Test, Better Scores: Boosting the Reliability of Short Online Intelligence Recruitment Tests with Nested Logit Item Response Theory Models.
Storme M; Myszkowski N; Baron S; Bernard D
J Intell; 2019 Jul; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 31295911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A Non-Parametric Item Response Theory Evaluation of the CAGE Instrument Among Older Adults.
Abdin E; Sagayadevan V; Vaingankar JA; Picco L; Chong SA; Subramaniam M
Subst Use Misuse; 2018 Feb; 53(3):391-399. PubMed ID: 28777686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Detection of malingering through the use of raven's standard progressive matrices.
Andrade C; Tharakan JF; Chari S
Indian J Psychiatry; 2001 Jan; 43(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 21407836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Refining a self-assessment of informatics competency scale using Mokken scaling analysis.
Yoon S; Shaffer JA; Bakken S
J Interprof Care; 2015; 29(6):579-86. PubMed ID: 26652630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Unidimensionality and reliability under Mokken scaling of the Dutch language version of the SF-36.
van der Heijden PG; van Buuren S; Fekkes M; Radder J; Verrips E
Qual Life Res; 2003 Mar; 12(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 12639065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
