227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32384734)
21. Improving Hearing Protection Device Noise Attenuation Through Fit-Testing in an Occupational Health Clinic.
Hayes ME; Hammond S; Montgomery AP; Stephenson L
Workplace Health Saf; 2022 Apr; 70(4):196-204. PubMed ID: 35353017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of hearing protection device effectiveness for musicians.
Crawford K; Willenbring K; Nothwehr F; Fleckenstein S; Anthony TR
Int J Audiol; 2023 Mar; 62(3):238-244. PubMed ID: 35143376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Interventions to promote the wearing of hearing protection.
El Dib RP; Mathew JL; Martins RH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Apr; (4):CD005234. PubMed ID: 22513929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Interventions to promote the wearing of hearing protection.
El Dib RP; Mathew JL; Martins RH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Sep; (9):CD005234. PubMed ID: 21901696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of hearing protection devices on speech intelligibility of Persian employees.
Karami M; Aliabadi M; Golmohammadi R; Hamidi Nahrani M
BMC Res Notes; 2020 Nov; 13(1):529. PubMed ID: 33176877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Individual fit testing of hearing protection devices.
Voix J; Hager LD
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 19534854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Research on the protective effect of hearing protective device for workers exposed to noise in a motor manufacturing enterprise].
Zhong X; Fu SJ; Zhu JW; Li X; Shi B; Su SB
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2023 Nov; 41(11):814-818. PubMed ID: 38073207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The viability of hearing protection device fit-testing at navy and marine corps accession points.
Federman J; Duhon C
Noise Health; 2016; 18(85):303-311. PubMed ID: 27991461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing Protection Devices Based on Microphone in Real Ear.
Biabani A; Aliabadi M; Golmohammadi R; Farhadian M
Saf Health Work; 2017 Dec; 8(4):364-370. PubMed ID: 29276635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Improved hearing protector attenuation through the use of a lubricant.
Ryan TJ; Meier RS; Tatarka A
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Nov; 14(11):931-937. PubMed ID: 28763289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation by industrial workers of passive and level-dependent hearing protection devices.
Tufts JB; Hamilton MA; Ucci AJ; Rubas J
Noise Health; 2011; 13(50):26-36. PubMed ID: 21173484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluating the effect of training along with fit testing on earmuff users in a Chinese textile factory.
Liu Y; Yang M
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2018 Jun; 15(6):518-526. PubMed ID: 29580200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Perforated Concave Earplug (pCEP): A Proof-of-Concept Earplug to Improve Sound Localization without Compromising Noise Attenuation.
Fink N; Levitas R; Eisenkraft A; Wagnert-Avraham L; Gertz SD; Fostick L
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Aug; 23(17):. PubMed ID: 37687865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
Verbeek JH; Kateman E; Morata TC; Dreschler WA; Mischke C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Oct; 10():CD006396. PubMed ID: 23076923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Using a boothless audiometer to estimate personal attenuation rating in a military hearing conservation clinic.
Kulinski D; Brungart DS
JASA Express Lett; 2022 Apr; 2(4):043601. PubMed ID: 36154227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of noise attenuation and verbal communication capabilities using three ear insert hearing protection systems among airport maintenance personnel.
Wagoner L; McGlothlin J; Chung K; Strickland E; Zimmerman N; Carlson G
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Feb; 4(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 17175514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Field attenuation characteristics of hearing protectors and differences in estimating their attenuation with different methods.
Gong W; Xu Y; Liu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jun; 151(6):3979. PubMed ID: 35778180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Analysis of verification results of protective effects of hearing protectors in different industries].
Shi HX; Su SB; Liu M; Li RZ; Wang TJ; Xiao B
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2023 May; 41(5):333-337. PubMed ID: 37248077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Hearing protector fit testing with off-shore oil-rig inspectors in Louisiana and Texas.
Murphy WJ; Themann CL; Murata TK
Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):688-98. PubMed ID: 27414471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
